Ed Sutton
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 8,556
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- No
If you think you will buy a lens and then worry if there's better out there then just buy the VRII as it can't be beaten (other than by primes).

If you think you will buy a lens and then worry if there's better out there then just buy the VRII as it can't be beaten (other than by primes).

Cant make a profit palI have one you can have for £750...

Didn't you want to use a tc though?
Btw the tammy 70-200 is a great choice
Oh don't worry, every lens type and combo has already been discussed several times overI think the first part is to figure out if it's a 70-200, 70-200 +TC that's required or a 70-300/150-600.
Does that include the 70-300 LOLThey're all good buys, all good lenses. Doubt you'll be disappointed with any of them.
Never bought from them. Panamoz have them for £680 I think.Have you bough from them before any good?
So you had both ooohhh so you say the 70-300 is a good lens but is the 70-200 worth he difference.. you any images from the 70-300 pls
Lion by Anirban Acharya, on Flickr
Bengal Tiger by Anirban Acharya, on Flickr
Cheetah by Anirban Acharya, on FlickrMinnnt that's a real bummer [emoji17]
Is it easily repaired do you know?
Never bought from them. Panamoz have them for £680 I think.
Here you go pics with Tamron 70-300 more here Album
Lion by Anirban Acharya, on Flickr
Bengal Tiger by Anirban Acharya, on Flickr
Cheetah by Anirban Acharya, on Flickr
As I said it is a good lens, but if you are after subject isolation shallow dof in tight spaces and busy backgrounds, the 70-300 will have limited use and this is where 2.8 shines.WOW those are great images for a £230 lens I reckon...
As discussed it's a good option this. Buy a used 70-300mm, see if it's something you use, if not sell it without much of a loss. If you use it a lot decide if you then want the 70-200 and again sell the 70-300 without much of a loss.Does that include the 70-300 LOL
Been trying to see how this lens fair with some portraits like the above.... My theory at this moment in time since I don't know what I want or if I use enough is to get a 70-300 and see how things goes. if I find it something I like and use ofter then i get some 2.8 glasses
As discussed it's a good option this. Buy a used 70-300mm, see if it's something you use, if not sell it without much of a loss. If you use it a lot decide if you then want the 70-200 and again sell the 70-300 without much of a loss.

Didn't you say you were picking it up from jessops though which means new?This is what I am going to do.. The 70-300 is being picked up tmr and see how I get on with it and if it a lens I use enough and if I do and happy with it I stay with it or if I find I need a faster lens then I get a faster lens but which one we come back to that when we come to it![]()
Didn't you say you were picking it up from jessops though which means new?
At 300mm the 70-300 is beautiful for portraiture. Compression works just aswell as a wider aperture when you have good lighting.
Please can someone just buy something!!!!!
What you on about..
Am buying tmr pal
Let's wait and see.
Saw this earlier today too
https://www.talkphotography.co.uk/threads/sigma-100-300-f4-ex-dg-for-sale.618385/
I think you should buy another a7.
Already looking for a A7the first version to mess about with
:banghead::banghead: Of course![]()
Why?![]()
![]()
Me too, well only one and on canon but as he says the VC is very good and it wasn't a bad lens by any stretch but it didn't give me the subject isolation I wantedYes i had the Tamron 70-300 vc. Twice. Great lens. Not 70-200 great but definately a good all rounder. The VC is seriously impressive.