flow
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 114
- Name
- Mark
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Several times!
Ah, glad it's not just me
Several times!
What happens if you can't? Can you get it recalibrated by Nikon?
Never had the issue, but you always have Low ISO to get you out of trouble if it arose. OK so DR will drop a bit, but it'll still be better than the likes of the 5DIII. Otherwise just use a CPL or ND filter to bring it down a stop.Coming back to the D750 topic (yeah, we do talk about that as well), I see some of you using fast glass (1.8 and 1.4) for portraits. Have you ever felt any limitation from the 1/4000 shutter speed on the D750 in broad daylight?
I have never used any camera that has 1/8000 shutter speed, but this argument comes often when people compare the D750 with the likes of D810 and 5DMKIII etc. Some even compare it against the D700, but it not relevant as base ISO of D700 is 200 so you can shoot at ISO 100 and get the same exposure in D750.
Just a deviation from the GAS related discussion.
I'm confused as to why the D700 would help as base ISO is 200 compared to 100 on the D750, so ISO 100 shutter 1/4000 and ISO 200 shutter 1/8000 would be the same in terms of exposure.1/4000 was a stumbling block for me at the weekend with the f2, I will definitely be getting some 72mm NDs for the 135,a bit of a faff, but there you go.
Having said that, it was bright sunlight, and I was pushing the lens in conditions I would never shoot portraits in.
When I moved to open shade it was fine, even with a light grey building acting as a reflector.
Often hit 4000th with 85 @1.4 though !
(Glad I've still got the D700 for just those occasions!)
Coming back to the D750 topic (yeah, we do talk about that as well), I see some of you using fast glass (1.8 and 1.4) for portraits. Have you ever felt any limitation from the 1/4000 shutter speed on the D750 in broad daylight?
I have never used any camera that has 1/8000 shutter speed, but this argument comes often when people compare the D750 with the likes of D810 and 5DMKIII etc. Some even compare it against the D700, but it not relevant as base ISO of D700 is 200 so you can shoot at ISO 100 and get the same exposure in D750.
Just a deviation from the GAS related discussion.
I'm confused as to why the D700 would help as base ISO is 200 compared to 100 on the D750, so ISO 100 shutter 1/4000 and ISO 200 shutter 1/8000 would be the same in terms of exposure.
You are right, of course, I'll explain what I meant.
I use the Lo setting on the D700, which drops the ISO to =100, then I dial in some more -ve compensation in the menu to lower the exposure more.
I keep it set up this way in one of the menu banks, so I can switch to it in these circumstances.
It does affect the DR a bit, but I find only noticeable at the highlight end.
It will be easier when I get some ND filters !
Was about to ask the sameSo why not use the lo iso on the 750? Or am i not understanding it right?
What happened to our Brands Hatch trip? [emoji3]
* again, if I were invited, which I'm not
You were invited, but the deal was you stood at a different corner.
Thank you, I'm happy with that, and I won't approach any of you in public.
You'll be up on your pedestal anyway.
So why not use the lo iso on the 750? Or am i not understanding it right?
Was about to ask the same
What happened to our Brands Hatch trip? [emoji3]
* again, if I were invited, which I'm not
Yeh I wasn't invited either Gregg, and I've even got a D750.Guess that means I'll have to stand at a different corner on my own as well.
George.
Yeh I wasn't invited either Gregg, and I've even got a D750.Guess that means I'll have to stand at a different corner on my own as well.
George.
Knowing you, you'd rock up with an X100s and an X-T1 with an old manual lens.
How far do you go with this Dehaze as i like it tooSo subtle use of dehaze in Lightroom is my new favourite tweak, really makes stuff pop. Trouble is I now want to go back and re-edit all my old pics![]()
![]()
So that's 2 corners away for you then.
![]()
As much as it needsHow far do you go with this Dehaze as i like it too
D75_2798 by Daryl Ellison, on Flickr
D75_2782 by Daryl Ellison, on Flickr
D75_2874 by Daryl Ellison, on Flickr
D75_2868 by Daryl Ellison, on FlickrHad a mess around using extension tubes on that (unloved) 85/1.8 of mine this afternoon. Seems to work okay.
![]()
Much!How much closer did you get Ed?
What pro controls does the D810 have that the D750 doesn't? Or do you just mean layout? Low ISO safe to use on D750 as IQ doesn't really suffer noticeably. Although of course base ISO of the D810 is 64 already IIRC so with the 1/8000 shutter it has 2 stops over the D750 (1stop lower ISO and 1 stop faster shutter).well, my transition from canon to nikon is almost complete. I've a string of high quality nikon lenses to compliment my d810 but with paid work looming i'm left with a few options:
- get another d810 (great camera, love it)
- get a d750 (would save about £600 over the d810...would be nice to have something lighter)
- carry on using my friend's d700 as backup for paid work until a new nikon FX comes out, ie d850 or whatever
Not really sure...i like the IDEA of the d750 but i'm not a massive fan of the limitations (ie shutter 1/4000, not as many pro controls etc). Having said that, i could see it working nicely alongside the d810 during weddings. Although i have been used to having two identical cameras (5d3's) alongside each other for the past few years and i'm concerned that the slight lack of continuity may affect me.
Are there any indicators as to when the next nikon full frame may appear? I can't afford a D5 really!