Another "Cracking" shot from you Paul, great detail, exposure, and comp'.
George.
Depends on your screen res. I did a few tests viewing D810 files at full res and then downsizing to 2MP (my laptop screen i1680 x 1050 so 1.7MP) and I couldn't see any difference at all between the images when viewed at full screen without zooming.Thanks for the answers guys. I don't print atm so would i see any benefit?
Two very nice shots Simon, both well composed with some good detail. #1 would be my fav'.
George.
Long Tail Tit by Swansea Jack, on FlickrThanks George.
I liked the LTT also, they are my favourite birds and have a group of up to sixteen visiting the garden daily so should get some practice with them. Managed to get this one yesterday, just wish this rain would stop and we could get some winter sun and better light.
Long Tail Tit by Swansea Jack, on Flickr
Thanks George.
I liked the LTT also, they are my favourite birds and have a group of up to sixteen visiting the garden daily so should get some practice with them. Managed to get this one yesterday, just wish this rain would stop and we could get some winter sun and better light.
Long Tail Tit by Swansea Jack, on Flickr
Thanks George.
I liked the LTT also, they are my favourite birds and have a group of up to sixteen visiting the garden daily so should get some practice with them. Managed to get this one yesterday, just wish this rain would stop and we could get some winter sun and better light.
Long Tail Tit by Swansea Jack, on Flickr
24-120 is pretty lightweight for a zoom lens![]()


Picked up my 50 1.8g today and with the D750 it makes such a quality yet lightweight(ish) package. Much better for me than the 24-120
Was editing a wedding my wife shot with a friend... 5D3 files alongside D750. Last time I edited 5D3 files was pre-D750 and I thought the Canon colours were good, but next to the D750 they look all wrong. Skin tone is too red, the greens are horrendous looking at times. Also, the shadow recovery and general dynamic range/noise is noticeably inferior.
Yep, the DR at even the highest iso setting is staggering.FYI, at the same iso's the d750 has more dynamic range at all sensitivities than the d800.
6400 is still pretty mindblowing. 12800 less so, but for web stuff, perfectly usable.Yep, the DR at even the highest iso setting is staggering.
I disagree. 12800 is perfectly usable in print.6400 is still pretty mindblowing. 12800 less so, but for web stuff, perfectly usable.
Is it?I disagree. 12800 is perfectly usable in print.
Yeah, the dynamic range is still great.Is it?Cool!
I haven't tried.
Just the mask actually. The suit tends to rub a bit. (a lot)
Lol. @Chaffing.
No. Let's try and keep this thread to D750. I know every other topic has been discussed in here but let's leave the D5 and D500 to other thread.
Mind you, I can still imagine some who have just bought the D750 putting it up on the classifieds for one or both of these cameras lol
I wouldn't worry the d500's 153 focus points will be a pain to scroll through! The d750 is still a great camera whatever is released and still takes great images too.Hold on hold on..... What new cameras. I have just bought a 750 :-\
I wouldn't worry the d500's 153 focus points will be a pain to scroll through!
I see the D500 is a DX camera .....phew!! And the D5 is a monster.... I am happy with my choice (get it tomorrow)
Just thought seeing as the D750 has a screen with no white cover thing what are people recommending for a screen protector ?