- Messages
- 34,670
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Mine work in mist and fog, Sunday morning was foggy on the way to work, all I had to do was put the fog lights on in the thicker patches.
Mine too
Mine work in mist and fog, Sunday morning was foggy on the way to work, all I had to do was put the fog lights on in the thicker patches.
But you've got a Ford, it has everything, and everything works perfectlyMine work in mist and fog, Sunday morning was foggy on the way to work, all I had to do was put the fog lights on in the thicker patches.
I leave my headlights on all the time whilst driving.
It does make me chuckle when I see people driving around with fog lights on when there's a slight mist on the road. Sometimes I think these people have never driven through "proper" fog where you have to drive at crawling speed because visibility is so poor.
What puzzles me is that to turn my rear fog lights on, I have to turn the front fogs on first. This is my first car with front fogs fitted as standard and this seems an odd arrangement. Not that I'd use them (front or rear) unless the visibility really did drop.It does make me chuckle when I see people driving around with fog lights on when there's a slight mist on the road. Sometimes I think these people have never driven through "proper" fog where you have to drive at crawling speed because visibility is so poor.
I agree, I seem to recall that in the past I was able to switch on my rears first, and then if I really wanted turn it one more turn and have the front as well. I might imagine things but I'm glad I'm not the only one.What puzzles me is that to turn my rear fog lights on, I have to turn the front fogs on first. This is my first car with front fogs fitted as standard and this seems an odd arrangement. Not that I'd use them (front or rear) unless the visibility really did drop.
Whilst on the subject of lighting, side lights - what's the point?
Depends on level of trim, but there are always a few extras that can be added. Glad to see your finally understanding though.But you've got a Ford, it has everything, and everything works perfectly
Some fog/mist can be pretty bright, if the sensor works on light intensity then it is understandable it may not kick in. My VAG and Mercedes cars are pretty sensitive, but my brain also engages to double check the computer got it right.
My fog lights are operated by separate switches next to the light switch. I can have front, rear or both fog lights on whichever I require. Even in patchy fog I'll use them, it means you can be seen at the earliest opportunity by other road users.What puzzles me is that to turn my rear fog lights on, I have to turn the front fogs on first. This is my first car with front fogs fitted as standard and this seems an odd arrangement. Not that I'd use them (front or rear) unless the visibility really did drop.
On because of the light level, or because the default to on when the wipers are on and the switch is at auto-lights? - would bright mist trigger them too?Even though it is raining this morning, the sky is still bright as opposed to dull and the auto lights came on straight away.
Be prepared there is apparently a fairly long wait.I will get a Ford one of these days. I'm still drawn towards the mustang v8.
On because of the light level, or because the default to on when the wipers are on and the switch is at auto-lights? - would bright mist trigger them too?
Looks like I might get to play with the auto-wipers today, still not convinced by the auto-lights.
Ford are introducing another improvement for it's cars with the Adaptive Front Lighting System. https://www.at.ford.com/en/homepage...ighting-technology-makes-driving-in-torr.html
Sounds like a evolution of the system on my Citroen that uses the inside fog light to illuminate the inside of a corner below 25mph.
Gives me some time to find some pennies behind the sofaBe prepared there is apparently a fairly long wait.
I believe it is just the light level itself. Even the other morning, it was bright sunshine but low level which would make it hard for following cars to see and the auto lights were on. The auto lights certainly seem better than I had on my 2007 Mondeo, and I thought they worked well enough at the time.
Ford are introducing another improvement for it's cars with the Adaptive Front Lighting System. https://www.at.ford.com/en/homepage...ighting-technology-makes-driving-in-torr.html
Mine does this - pull switch to first position to turn on front fogs, and pull to second position to turn on rear fogs as well.What puzzles me is that to turn my rear fog lights on, I have to turn the front fogs on first. This is my first car with front fogs fitted as standard and this seems an odd arrangement. Not that I'd use them (front or rear) unless the visibility really did drop.
I always thought it was that if you parked on a road with speed limit of 40mph or greater, they had to be turned on and left on.Whilst on the subject of lighting, side lights - what's the point?
Not quite the story the headline would make out. There's a big distinction between the Bundesrat and "Germany".This will probably push things along a bit: Germany Calls For a Ban On Combustion Engine Cars By 2030
Hooray for smelly factories creating the resources required to build those batteries, the impact on the environment, and the scrapping of perfectly good goods.This will probably push things along a bit: Germany Calls For a Ban On Combustion Engine Cars By 2030
Hooray for the end of smelly, noisy, heavy cars!
And how does the electricity get generated to charge these vehicles? Or build the battery packs?Internal combustion engine are tiny explosions, there's only so much noise isolation can be done. Electric motors are quieter by definition.
Modern cars may not smell, but they do certainly output harmful gas during operation, harming everyone behind you.
There's no denying our cities will be a much nicer place without internal combustion cars pumping pollution and noise next to you.
Weight is something electric cars need to catch up on. This is the inherent benefit of having such a high energy density storage known as fossil fuel. But car engines are only 20% efficient compared to 60% of electric cars (source), with fossil fuel age coming to an end in this century, we must use the most efficient power train wherever possible.
Also, electric cars make city driving more fun, no more waiting for engine, turbo and gears to get into their optimum speed/ratio. Just the go peddle and you. The new Zoe looks to be the car to get when they abolish their battery rental monthly charges.
And how does the electricity get generated to charge these vehicles? Or build the battery packs?
Yes Tesla S is pretty large however not really a seven seater as the seats in the boot are for children only. The X is much better from that perspective.I have a Kia Soul. It's roomy and range is ok for a local runabout. It's not a luxury car. Tesla do that better. The S is huge. It's RS6 avant sized at least.
Don't know about your car but mine doesn't smell, is not noisy, and a lot lighter than the electric versions![]()
None. Push bike and then underground. I do drive a petrol car once or twice a month if carrying kids somewhere.
I did the sums on my roof for that technology, break even point would be in 19 years. And that is on the basis that nothing goes wrong with it. It seems to make no sense when you've already got an efficient house. I'd love it when it is all build in to the roof tiles. And as I said I would love a hydrocell generator on my driveway.I don't take EV in its current form because I can't afford a Model S, and the lack of internal storage space (door bins, central cubby) caused a veto from the wife.
The Prius is hardly green. All of its energy still comes from the 20% efficient power plant burning dead animals. You'd really want renewable energy source to power the car such as solar/wind/hydro.
In that sense, I have put my money where my mouth is, I've invested in solar panels on my roof. I'll be adding a battery to the system when the technology becomes ready. The idea is that the excess power in the battery after evening usage will charge my EV.
Modern turbo direct injection petrol engines have an efficiency of around 35%, advancements in friction losses and power increases are being made all the time, Some of the losses are from driving/powering ancillaries on the car, so aren't true losses as they are still being utilised. EV vehicles still have a very limited range, hence why hybrids are currently the better option.Weight is something electric cars need to catch up on. This is the inherent benefit of having such a high energy density storage known as fossil fuel. But car engines are only 20% efficient compared to 60% of electric cars (source), with fossil fuel age coming to an end in this century, we must use the most efficient power train wherever possible.
Also, electric cars make city driving more fun, no more waiting for engine, turbo and gears to get into their optimum speed/ratio. Just the go peddle and you. The new Zoe looks to be the car to get when they abolish their battery rental monthly charges.
Finally got a clip of what our new family car will sound like, it sounds fantastic to me especially considering this is on a new car and not yet run in. However my wife asked whether it can be not so loud, and that is where we are bang on topic for thread. Adaptive settings and keys, she can have her settings and have the exhaust closed and in quiet mode and I can have mine Fast and Loud
View: https://youtu.be/zn2Ti_PzfaE
Other than the lack of turbo spooling down, it doesn't sound too dissimilar to my old Mondeo ST TDCi with decat and performance exhaust.Finally got a clip of what our new family car will sound like, it sounds fantastic to me especially considering this is on a new car and not yet run in. However my wife asked whether it can be not so loud, and that is where we are bang on topic for thread. Adaptive settings and keys, she can have her settings and have the exhaust closed and in quiet mode and I can have mine Fast and Loud
View: https://youtu.be/zn2Ti_PzfaE
Oooo I had an escort that sounded like that once.
I got a new exhaust, and it was fine after that, it even passed the MOT
![]()

Whilst I agree that for the true sound you need to hear it driving under load, and ideally the exhaust has done about 10K miles at least. But hey if it sounds called like that then I can imagine how magical it will becomeOther than the lack of turbo spooling down, it doesn't sound too dissimilar to my old Mondeo ST TDCi with decat and performance exhaust.
For true sound you need to hear it being driven and engine is under load, not just revving it at standstill.