Motorway middle-lane hoggers to face on-the-spot fines

Status
Not open for further replies.
All I am saying is this could happen, the authorities always throw the "what happens if" argument at people so I am also saying "what happens if" and yes I am fully aware of the controls of the modern automobile and believe it or not am qualified to actually drive one.
the scenario might never happen, it might happen every day, the police officer might be taking a bite out of his doughnut as you approach or looking down and not see the car pull in,all he would see is you driving close to the other car, it could happen. please don't think I am against this new fine system, I am completely in agreement with it in fact I don't think it goes far enough but as somebody as already said the problem will be policing it

Because all police eat donuts while on patrol, yawn...
 
Like I said in my post, depending on where you live depends on whether you took lessons/test on a dual carriageway or not.

I failed my test first time and in the lessons leading up to that i never went on a dual carriageway, I then moved so test was at a different place but this time in the lessons leading up to my test I did go on a dual carriageway, but it was the sort that went from one lane to two, so no slip roads to encounter.

If it was made compulsory to do some motorway driving once passing your test

When I first passed I knew I would be forced to tackle the m25 sooner or later. Like any half sensible person I booked a two hour motorway lesson . I was still terrified that first time I had to do it on my own.
 
Last edited:
Tailgaters will also be fined.

So that means every lorry driver then???

Forget lane huggers, lorry drivers are the most dangerous imo. Far too often they indicate and pull out requiring you to brake. They also sit a foot off your bumper. While a car is a dangerous weapon, a lorry is far more dangerous due to size and weight. You also have them hogging lanes when they overtake another lorry, sometimes taking 2 miles to get past!
 
lorry drivers are the most dangerous imo.

Nonsense. Holders of class C (and class D) licences who are driving every day are generally much better drivers than the average car driver.

As with everything, there are exceptions but the things you mention are not the norm with the vast majority of professional drivers.


Steve.
 
So that means every lorry driver then???

Forget lane huggers, lorry drivers are the most dangerous imo. Far too often they indicate and pull out requiring you to brake. They also sit a foot off your bumper. While a car is a dangerous weapon, a lorry is far more dangerous due to size and weight. You also have them hogging lanes when they overtake another lorry, sometimes taking 2 miles to get past!

While I agree there are some total idiot lorry drivers there are more good ones. The most Annoying thing they do is the 56mph overtake of another wagon doing 55.5mph going up the a Hill. Ffs .
 
What if sign posts / satnav tell you to stay in the middle lane because that's the direction you want to go.... will you still get fined?
 
It's funny how these threads about traveling on roads go, it was the same in the assaulted cyclist thread.. Where its always someone else that's the bad guy on the road.
 
What if sign posts / satnav tell you to stay in the middle lane because that's the direction you want to go.... will you still get fined?

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: A joke surely?

Or are you one of these folk that blindly follows a satnav into a field because that's what it told you to do?
 
Or are you one of these folk that blindly follows a satnav into a field because that's what it told you to do?

No I'm not, I do it the analog way and read signs,

I know what I meant... It's not even worth my time explaining :lol:
 
strangely enough if the road signs tell you to stay in the middle lane - like when motorways merge, then no you won't get fined - did you really have to ask ? (just like you don't get done for obstructing the traffic when signs tell you to slow down)
 
Last edited:
Nonsense. Holders of class C (and class D) licences who are driving every day are generally much better drivers than the average car driver.

As with everything, there are exceptions but the things you mention are not the norm with the vast majority of professional drivers.

Steve.

Most sit far too close to the vehicle in front. That is dangerous. Also, they may be doing 55, I may be doing 70 and they will just pull out forcing me to brake. Not good driving.
 
Don't really get the hogging bit if you're driving at the limit then you're driving not hogging your lane, if you are driving below limit then slow lane and if you want to over take then fast lane?
 
Don't really get the hogging bit if you're driving at the limit then you're driving not hogging your lane, if you are driving below limit then slow lane and if you want to over take then fast lane?

yeah but why are you driving at the limit in lane 2, if lane 1 is empty ?
 
Don't really get the hogging bit if you're driving at the limit then you're driving not hogging your lane, if you are driving below limit then slow lane and if you want to over take then fast lane?

This sums the problem up - "I'm doing 70 therefore I can stay in the middle lane, why are all those idiots flashing me??"
 
Last edited:
strangely enough if the road signs tell you to stay in the middle lane - like when motorways merge, then no you won't get fined - did you really have to ask ? (just like you don't get done for obstructing the traffic when signs tell you to slow down)

Cheers Pete,

I had to ask, just to make sure I wasn't going mad :D

Just call it 'thinking of everything'
 
Don't really get the hogging bit if you're driving at the limit then you're driving not hogging your lane, if you are driving below limit then slow lane and if you want to over take then fast lane?

There is no slow lane and fast last.
 
Don't really get the hogging bit if you're driving at the limit then you're driving not hogging your lane, if you are driving below limit then slow lane and if you want to over take then fast lane?

I think you would "get the hogging bit" if you read and understood the highway code. Maybe this bit "You should always drive in the left-hand lane when the road ahead is clear. If you are overtaking a number of slower-moving vehicles, you should return to the left-hand lane as soon as you are safely past."

Here, fill your boots.

https://www.gov.uk/browse/driving/highway-code
 
Don't really get the hogging bit if you're driving at the limit then you're driving not hogging your lane, if you are driving below limit then slow lane and if you want to over take then fast lane?

There's no such thing as a slow or fast lane.
 
Also, while they are at it, they should fine drivers whose cars are fitted with loud oil drums for rear exhausts thus effectively making a £10,000 car sound more like a £500 clapped out banger.
 
Can you prove that?

Well, Filming or taking pics while driving is not the wisest thing to do so no, not in court of law, but this is based on observations over the last 20 years and many motorway trips. Anyone who drives over here will see this on any trip.
 
If I am doing 70-77mph why does anyone need to overtake me? They are speeding if they do. They should be able to sit behind me and not need to over or undertake. How are you hogging the lane then? You aren't stopping them get passed because they shouldn't be passing you
 
If I am doing 70-77mph why does anyone need to overtake me? They are speeding if they do. They should be able to sit behind me and not need to over or undertake. How are you hogging the lane then? You aren't stopping them get passed because they shouldn't be passing you

Two wrongs don't make a right.

And it's just belligerent.
 
What about action on slow drivers? On my local road I do get stuck behind cars doing say 40 or 45 in a 60 limit. Just as dangerous as speeding.
 
If I am doing 70-77mph why does anyone need to overtake me? They are speeding if they do. They should be able to sit behind me and not need to over or undertake. How are you hogging the lane then? You aren't stopping them get passed because they shouldn't be passing you

Does not matter what speed your speedometer is indicating, you are not in charge of policing the speeds of other road users.
 
If I am doing 70-77mph why does anyone need to overtake me? They are speeding if they do. They should be able to sit behind me and not need to over or undertake. How are you hogging the lane then? You aren't stopping them get passed because they shouldn't be passing you

So while smug Joe blocks the road because he has become the road speed monitor, the doctor going to an emergency, the person going to hospital because the partner or child is dying, the police car which for some reason doesn't have blue lights must sit behind you because you are the speeding monitor all of a sudden.

Get some common sense and STAY OUT of the overtaking lanes if you aren't overtaking.
 
What about action on slow drivers? On my local road I do get stuck behind cars doing say 40 or 45 in a 60 limit. Just as dangerous as speeding.

Nothing like as dangerous as speeding.

Look up the formulas for kinetic energy and momentum and see what part speed plays in them.


Steve.
 
Last edited:
So while smug Joe blocks the road because he has become the road speed monitor, the doctor going to an emergency, the person going to hospital because the partner or child is dying, the police car which for some reason doesn't have blue lights must sit behind you because you are the speeding monitor all of a sudden.

Get some common sense and STAY OUT of the overtaking lanes if you aren't overtaking.

That's overly dramatic.

Anyone of those people would have sirens or begin flashing, hooting and gesturing in which case you would realise they needed to pass and move out the way :nono:
 
Great news! Shame they didn't increase the speed limit to 100mph .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top