Minimum alcohol pricing

Status
Not open for further replies.
More enforcement of current legislation, maybe. IIRC, it's technically an offence to be drunk in public but that's very rarely enforced unless an excuse is wanted to get someone off the streets. It's also (IIRC) an offence to supply someone who is already drunk with intoxicating liquor - again, rarely observed.
 
More enforcement of current legislation, maybe. IIRC, it's technically an offence to be drunk in public but that's very rarely enforced unless an excuse is wanted to get someone off the streets. It's also (IIRC) an offence to supply someone who is already drunk with intoxicating liquor - again, rarely observed.

Interesting, it needs enforced for sure. If it were, it would stop this overnight. Although how can plod cope with the sheer volume of people this applies to I do not know. There is only so many of them out there vs all the drunkards in public and people supplying drunks in the pubs with more booze, dibble cannot arrest all these people, they'd be hopelessly out numbered
 
Let's get down to the point quickly and effectively. @ST4 why did you start drinking at the university? I expect the same answer will apply to many other young people. Was it the [low] price alone? A typical student on a hefty loan in theory shouldn't be able to afford a single pint in a pub already, yet they drink lorry loads.

P.S. you do not suggest pulling out of EU making this country into Islamic State with Sharia law, are you? I am now genuinely confused.
 
Peer pressure and bad culture. Low prices in chain pubs made drinking very cheap, particularly during the week where clubs would put on 2 for 1 promotions. If alcohol was rationed or prohibitvely expensive, which it simply is not I would not have afforded it.

What has pulling out of the EU got to do with Sharia law? Parts of Sharia law I quite like actually but its irrelvent here. Britain may well be outwith the EU sooner than you think. Maybe, it depends what the majority of her people want. However, the EU isn't the reason for our alcohol culture, although, back in the 70's before we were in the EU, my family tell me city centres were not full of these drinking dens, and booze was dearer relatively to wages. Perhaps the EU is to blame...somehow...
 
Was going to post in the other thread but locked...

Who else thinks that ST4 is an illegal Muslim immigrant from Romania, with a drink problem?

I'm amazed at how many interchangeable threads like this we have ... can i suggest merging them all in to one entitled 'mein kampf for dummies'
 
Peer pressure and bad culture.

*ALARM KLAXXON*

Wrong answer.
You began drinking because YOU chose to.
End of.
 
*ALARM KLAXXON*

Wrong answer.
You began drinking because YOU chose to.
End of.

Yes, but drinking and drinking excessively are two very different things. I did, by choice drink excessively, but had it been an expensive or prohabitve choice to make, I would not have done so as it wouldn't have been available to me. I firmly believe rationing is the only way to fix this sort of heavy drinking.

I'm amazed at how many interchangeable threads like this we have ... can i suggest merging them all in to one entitled 'mein kampf for dummies'

We have many threads like because you troll them with comments like that.
 

Its like rain on your wedding day , a death row pardon 3 minutes too late

leaving aside my exploding irony meter , we have many interchangeable threads because your answer to pretty much everything is that we should leave europe and/ or that its the fault of the underclass scum

it gets so its hard to tell which thread is which after a while as most bear only a passing resemblace to their putative subject matter
 
I firmly believe rationing is the only way to fix this sort of heavy drinking.
.

which demonstates a total lack of understanding of the nature of addiction
 
which demonstates a total lack of understanding of the nature of addiction

The trick is prevention rather than cure. If you make alcohol procurement expensive and hard, or even ration it, you prevent the addiction in a lot of cases.

Could you imagine if Heroin was legalised and easily available how that would pan out?
 
Last edited:
Its like rain on your wedding day , a death row pardon 3 minutes too late

leaving aside my exploding irony meter , we have many interchangeable threads because your answer to pretty much everything is that we should leave europe and/ or that its the fault of the underclass scum

it gets so its hard to tell which thread is which after a while as most bear only a passing resemblace to their putative subject matter

Huh? Leaving Europe and making the work shy avoiding underclass would solve a lot of problems. You disagree with that. Great. Its a democracy, you'll get your say, I will get mine.
 
I guess we ought to do away with salt then.....and sugar...

....and fat....

And aspartame.....

Wait...Tap water's not that good either these days; all those chemicals.

And vehicle emissions...let's ban cars.

Wait....Air!!!

Steve you need to stop trying to dictate how others' live there lives and try getting on with your own.
 
Huh? Leaving Europe and making the work shy avoiding underclass would solve a lot of problems. You disagree with that. Great. Its a democracy, you'll get your say, I will get mine.

but its not relevant to every thread , which is why so many of these threadsare now virtually interchangeable and the discussion flows from one to another as they ge closed for being about politics
 
Could you imagine if Heroin was legalised and easily available how that would pan out?

yep - thered be no mre dirty needles, sharing works, people dying of impurities or too pure , thered be no more addicts being exploited by dealers or commiting crimes to get their next fix , it'd be great - but the govt hasnt got the balls

you only have to look at 1920s america to see that prohibition isnt a good idea
 
Steve you need to stop trying to dictate how others' live there lives and try getting on with your own.

I don't see Steve trying to dictate to anyone how they should live their lives, he is merely expressing his own opinion as does everyone else in here. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ST4
Steve, rather than lecture people on how they should live a perfect life (in your eyes), why not continue with your perfect life and let us continue with our less than perfect (in your eyes) lives, so that we may continue having a laugh with our friends, getting a bit tipsy at BBQ's, letting our hair down once in a while, and sitting at home enjoying a glass or three of wine without impacting on other people's privacy.
 
Steve, rather than lecture people on how they should live a perfect life (in your eyes), why not continue with your perfect life and let us continue with our less than perfect (in your eyes) lives, so that we may continue having a laugh with our friends, getting a bit tipsy at BBQ's, letting our hair down once in a while, and sitting at home enjoying a glass or three of wine without impacting on other people's privacy.

but everyone who drinks is doing it in the street in an antisocial manner and making steve feel unsafe on the night bus (he needs a big dog to guard him imo :ROFLMAO: )
 
Where have I told other people how to live their lives. Merely voiced my opinions/views on modern day alcohol consumption and the impact it has on other people and that I support hard line measures to reduce alcohol availability to the good of society.

The fact people are saying this to me means they have no credible discussion to make...

Like this outburst....

but everyone who drinks is doing it in the street in an antisocial manner and making steve feel unsafe on the night bus (he needs a big dog to guard him imo :ROFLMAO: )

More trolling or rhetoric?
 
Last edited:
More enforcement of current legislation, maybe. IIRC, it's technically an offence to be drunk in public but that's very rarely enforced unless an excuse is wanted to get someone off the streets. It's also (IIRC) an offence to supply someone who is already drunk with intoxicating liquor - again, rarely observed.

Perhaps maybe this hits it on the head. If being drunk in public is an offence and it's offence to supply someone who is already drunk with intoxicating liquor, Moose would have no problems with these being enforced to the letter.

Just a bit of banter.

No, I suspect it is more than that.
 
yep - thered be no mre dirty needles, sharing works, people dying of impurities or too pure , thered be no more addicts being exploited by dealers or commiting crimes to get their next fix , it'd be great - but the govt hasnt got the balls

You think class A drugs should be legalised...wow.

Steve, rather than lecture people on how they should live a perfect life (in your eyes), why not continue with your perfect life and let us continue with our less than perfect (in your eyes) lives, so that we may continue having a laugh with our friends, getting a bit tipsy at BBQ's, letting our hair down once in a while, and sitting at home enjoying a glass or three of wine without impacting on other people's privacy.

Who's privacy am I impacting when I say the the government needs to clamp out binge drinking and alochol related anti social behaviour?
 
You think class A drugs should be legalised...wow.

I think there is a good argument for it, certainly merits professional people looking at it in detail. Would be a way of raising tax, making sure stuff was good quality... not so sure we should be legalising crystal meth as that really is a bad drug but speed/e/cocaine/weed could be possible.

Drug use will happen regardless, so why not try to control it?
 
Perhaps maybe this hits it on the head. If being drunk in public is an offence and it's offence to supply someone who is already drunk with intoxicating liquor, Moose would have no problems with these being enforced to the letter.

its only a licencing offence to supply someone already drunk - that is if a pub or off licence serves you while you are beyond the point of capability ... that aside though you're right i have no issue with the police enforcing the drunk and disorderly laws ... except that the police are under manned and resourced to fight a pitch battle on sauchihall street every friday and saturday

No, I suspect it is more than that.

so we can add paranoia to the list then ... I also love how you are happy to hand it out, but you can't take it
 
I think there is a good argument for it, certainly merits professional people looking at it in detail. Would be a way of raising tax, making sure stuff was good quality... not so sure we should be legalising crystal meth as that really is a bad drug but speed/e/cocaine/weed could be possible.

Drug use will happen regardless, so why not try to control it?

exactly and by legalising it you takke it out of the hands of criminals and ensure that what's being supplied isn't cut with rat poison, administered with dirty works, or extortionately expensive - you also at a stroke do away with a massive policing problem thus freeing up more resources to help those that get addicted and police those who get unruly under the influence.

when you think about it tobbaco is legal, alcohol is legal , so why not other drugs ?
 
Peer pressure and bad culture. Low prices in chain pubs made drinking very cheap, particularly during the week where clubs would put on 2 for 1 promotions. If alcohol was rationed or prohibitvely expensive, which it simply is not I would not have afforded it.

What has pulling out of the EU got to do with Sharia law? Parts of Sharia law I quite like actually but its irrelvent here. Britain may well be outwith the EU sooner than you think. Maybe, it depends what the majority of her people want. However, the EU isn't the reason for our alcohol culture, although, back in the 70's before we were in the EU, my family tell me city centres were not full of these drinking dens, and booze was dearer relatively to wages. Perhaps the EU is to blame...somehow...
How about some self control opposed to state interference?i find it unbelievable that just because you couldn't say no, everyone else has to suffer the same state treatment. Very selfish view of the world.
 
nothing to make up from where i'm standing, its a debate of opposing positions, not a blood feud
 
How about some self control opposed to state interference?i find it unbelievable that just because you couldn't say no, everyone else has to suffer the same state treatment. Very selfish view of the world.
It's not just me, there are droves of people who drink to wanton excess, at some point the state has to kick in.

... that aside though you're right i have no issue with the police enforcing the drunk and disorderly laws ... except that the police are under manned and resourced to fight a pitch battle on sauchihall street every friday and saturday

That's why it needs regulated, so they do not have to. I agree the cities are awash with rowdy drunks, making it more available and attainable will make the problem worse. If its more expensive, harder to get, yes there will still be a problem, but the police won't so hopeless outnumbered to deal with what is a very anti social and nasty problem.
 
Last edited:
And while we're at it I think table legs should be covered with linen to stop them inflaming my ardour when I see them.
 
And while we're at it I think table legs should be covered with linen to stop them inflaming my ardour when I see them.
And you can put a shirt on too while you are at it :D
 
Its hardly a new thing. Clubs in London at kicking out time had the same problems that town centers seem to have now.

The only difference is that people were generally paid in cash on Thursday in the past, so the weekend started then. But it does seem to me to be a lot worse now.

Anyway, back to the issue.

1. pricing. Sell it at double the price, people would still buy it, but only half as much. Would it get rid of the drunkenness? No, it might reduce those who are drunk and incapable though. Incapable is not a bad thing though. Incapable means can't start the obligatory fight.
2. Opening hours. If the pubs aren't open they can't sell booze. But then if its cheap in supermarkets, they'll just buy it there. Answer? Licencing hours for pubs AND supermarkets. Still wont stop it but means a lot more pre planning
3. Policing. Nick a drunk and disorderly, it turns into a cecil B de Millne production for no other reason than to keep the IPCC at bay. Probably means when they go from the fight stage to the "Oh my god I want to die" stage a visit to the local hospital tying up at least 2 police officers for a 4 hour wait. The CPS wont procede with a charge, so its pointless. For drunk & incapable, go straight to hospital, cause if he dies in the nick, the IPCC will go all out to hang you, reality not featuring large in their world.

Solution. Nothings going to end it, but we could save some of the money sorting the crap out by re introducing licencing hours and pushing the price of drink up. That will annoy all of middle England as well, so leave as is, and annoy everyone.

Legalise drugs? Oh please behave! It will have no benefit at all! Even turbo cabbage sends people loopy, that's before it gives you lung cancer far earlier than real cigarettes do. Anything heavier than that is just plain stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ST4
Wowza, are we still here? I've been away from the computer all weekend. Got a great deal on 2 crates of Carlsberg at out local supermarket, so have been really busy working on them.

Oops....wrong thread!

yes this isn't the "I drink rats p*** lager confession" thread :lol:
 
That's why it needs regulated, so they do not have to. I agree the cities are awash with rowdy drunks, making it more available and attainable will make the problem worse. If its more expensive, harder to get, yes there will still be a problem, but the police won't so hopeless outnumbered to deal with what is a very anti social and nasty problem.

or we could hire more cops and resource them properly (more expensive doesnt equal harder to get for you average antisocial chav btw, it equals "need to nick another handbag")
 
or we could hire more cops and resource them properly (more expensive doesnt equal harder to get for you average antisocial chav btw, it equals "need to nick another handbag")

Cops are expensive in salary costs. An ok idea but its better to prevent the problem rather than fight it with lots of police officers once people are drunk and out of control, why not kerb the alcohol intake so that never happens
 
It is even better to prevent the cause of the problem rather than have draconian laws that affect the majority yet who don't cause any problem.
 
Last edited:
Cops are expensive in salary costs. An ok idea but its better to prevent the problem rather than fight it with lots of police officers once people are drunk and out of control, why not kerb the alcohol intake so that never happens

People don't suddenly wake up one day and think "Right, today I'm going to drink 13 pints of lager and spend the rest of my evenings completely off my tits", so why not start teaching the correct attitude to alcohol from the get go, and raising kids a bit more responsibly?
 
People don't suddenly wake up one day and think "Right, today I'm going to drink 13 pints of lager and spend the rest of my evenings completely off my tits", so why not start teaching the correct attitude to alcohol from the get go, and raising kids a bit more responsibly?
Most of them are probably following in their parents foot steps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ST4
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top