Depends. Glossy looks fantastic, I always had my wedding prints done to 9X6 or 12X8 glossies, but it was a PITA handling them, as they pick up fingerprints so easily, I used to wear a pair of cotton gloves when mounting them in albums to save having to deal with the fingerprints later.
If it's for framing, matt might be better as the reflection usually isn't a good thing. Get non-reflective glass frames if you can.
I produce most of my Landscape/Aerial pictures on matt paper (Permajet Portrait Classic) as it gives a fine art finish however it is poor for sports and mono where either a fibre based gloss or full gloss paper gives a more suitable finish. Horse for courses really.
From the thread title I thought you were decorating your living room
I think it depends on the subject matter and colour/B+W etc. I Agree with Gary above that landscapes do look better matt whilst gloss for weddings etc.
Lustre seems the best, as it has a glossy look yet doesn't pick up finger-prints like gloss does. As MJ said, DS Colourlabs do lustre, and it's the same price as gloss (why would anyone choose gloss over lustre at the same price???). Every other printers I've come across charge extra for lustre.
naked and colour I'd go for gloss (my personal preference is harman FB glossinkjet)
Naked and B&W I'd go go for Matt (assuming we are talking fuji crystal archive type prints not inject matt) or a FB gloss print
behind glass I'd go for a luster or FB inkjet or a matt print (fuji type print)
I used to be a big fan of gloss and matt would put me off. But recently I've had a change of view and have found myself drawn towards matt. The last few enlargements that I did were on matt.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.