Interesting comparison. Was there rail before 1750?
In that comparison, a new technology emerged and proven to be better.
EV is a necessary stepping stone to reduce emissions ASAP.
If there is a new zero localised emission technology that proves to be better, it may well take over. But that has been promised for the last 40 years, it's not coming anytime soon. It is also not better when considering its massive efficiency losses.
en.wikipedia.org
Mass transit and micro-mobility is the only truly sustainable way to cut global emissions. But as UK government still haven't legalised electric micro mobility, we have a very long way to go just in ideology and mindset. In the mean time, an item that lasts over 10 years old on average should have next 10 years in mind.
In 10 years time, the grid that charges EV got vastly cleaner:
This is the story of the policy decisions and other developments behind the UK electricity sector’s decade of transformation.
interactive.carbonbrief.org
Defra release the 2023 conversion factors for carbon emissions.
circularecology.com
View attachment 438701
THAT is the reason we are pushing 100% EV for 2035. Cars are on the road for a long time. EV's get cleaner as the grid get cleaner as we approach 2050.
As individuals, you (generic you) are right to be sceptic of new technology. But to delay by saying wait for even newer unproven tech is rather hypercritical.