Gimbal head for canon 200-400mm Pics added.

JackBarley

Suspended / Banned
Messages
540
Name
Harry
Edit My Images
Yes
I was a good boy last year and Santa brought me the above lens. I now need a gimbal head for it and am looking for recommendations.
 

For my big babies I have chosen" Jobu Design's Pro2".
 

For my big babies I have chosen" Jobu Design's Pro2".
Had a look on the Jobu website, said they are no longer making the Pro2 due to lenses becoming lighter although on the UK site they have them in stock. They say the HD Mkiv is strong enough. More confusion.
 

The attachment is the same as it is standard! 3/8"

Important is to have no column but a levelling base…

Let me go in the studio, I'll take a few shots of my kit…
 

Harry, these are SOOC won't take the time to process.
Note that here the levelling base is not mounted… as it is normally!


this is like the others —the two knobs are on the same side and one should see the front lens from this position.
Ok if one is shooting with a prime lens (image from the web)

Generic.jpg


 
Last edited:
…and both hands are on the combo to remove it… ( Isaid to Olivier that the whole old empire will know that he bites his nails!)
 
Last edited:
I have a Benro GH2 and a Wimberley - not that much in it - if I had a 200-400 I'd have got a Wimberley though.
 

The attachment is the same as it is standard! 3/8"

Important is to have no column but a levelling base…

Let me go in the studio, I'll take a few shots of my kit…
I was thinking of the lens foot, as I think both Wimberley and Jobu do a replacement foot as opposed to a plate.
 
replacement foot as opposed to a plate.

My lenses were added some short plates attached to their
respective
foot. Both of them are form Wimberley as they have a feature that the
Jobu don't have.
 

My lenses were added some short plates attached to their
respective
foot. Both of them are form Wimberley as they have a feature that the
Jobu don't have.
Just emailed Jobu to see if they have a foot that fits the 200-400 instead of fitting a plate to the original foot.
 
I have a nikon 200-400 (nearly a similar sized lens) on a Benro GH2, it's a good gimbal head for the price. I picked up a used one from here. It's definitely better than the cheap beike version I previously had with a 300 f4. It's probably not as good as a wimberley but then it wasn't the same price. I have a kirk replacement foot for the Nikon 200-400, it's a lot better than adding a plate to the lens foot. The Nikon foot was too short whereas the longer kirk foot is the perfect size.
 
I have a nikon 200-400 (nearly a similar sized lens) on a Benro GH2, it's a good gimbal head for the price. I picked up a used one from here. It's definitely better than the cheap beike version I previously had with a 300 f4. It's probably not as good as a wimberley but then it wasn't the same price. I have a kirk replacement foot for the Nikon 200-400, it's a lot better than adding a plate to the lens foot. The Nikon foot was too short whereas the longer kirk foot is the perfect size.
Can you use the foot as a carrying handle? I know some of the replacements are a bit close to the lens to be comfortable.
 
Can you use the foot as a carrying handle? I know some of the replacements are a bit close to the lens to be comfortable.
The nikon 200-400 kirk replacement foot is longer than the original and deep enough as it's L shaped rather than flat and I can use it as a carry handle. So you can compare it this is the one:

http://www.wexphotographic.com/buy-kirk-quick-release-lens-plate-nikon-200-400mm-f4-a/p1006454

The one for your canon 200-400 may be different as this is specific lens foot to the nikon 200-400. Looking at the photos on the kirk website they look similar, maybe the canon foot is slightly shorter due to the angle part but depth looks similar in the photos. The fact they do a 'sure grip' type foot suggest you can use it to carry it.

https://www.kirkphoto.com/Lens_Plate_for_Canon_EF_200-400_f_4_L_IS_USM_replacing_Canon_foot.html
 
The nikon 200-400 kirk replacement foot is longer than the original and deep enough as it's L shaped rather than flat and I can use it as a carry handle. So you can compare it this is the one:

http://www.wexphotographic.com/buy-kirk-quick-release-lens-plate-nikon-200-400mm-f4-a/p1006454

The one for your canon 200-400 may be different as this is specific lens foot to the nikon 200-400. Looking at the photos on the kirk website they look similar, maybe the canon foot is slightly shorter due to the angle part but depth looks similar in the photos. The fact they do a 'sure grip' type foot suggest you can use it to carry it.

https://www.kirkphoto.com/Lens_Plate_for_Canon_EF_200-400_f_4_L_IS_USM_replacing_Canon_foot.html
Thanks for the help, finally gone for the Jobu with the Jobu foot as they are made for specific lenses like you say.
 
4th Generation Design do a replacement foot for the 200-400. Probably cheaper than the Kirk, I use one on my 600mm and imho much better than the Canon one.! And I use the Benro GH-2.
 

My lenses were added some short plates attached to their
respective
foot. Both of them are form Wimberley as they have a feature that the
Jobu don't have.
Thanks for all your help, have gone for the Jobu HD mkiv as it let me have enough cash for the replacement foot as well. With any luck should be here tomorrow!
 
Make sure you get a good quality Arca Swiss style mount too - I use the Benro GH2 with my 600mm f4 but with a Wimberley P50 mount. It's expensive at around £50, but make for a really stable combination.
 
Make sure you get a good quality Arca Swiss style mount too - I use the Benro GH2 with my 600mm f4 but with a Wimberley P50 mount. It's expensive at around £50, but make for a really stable combination.
Have ordered the Jobu replacement foot, should arrive today so will post pic when I have all the pieces.
 
Waiting for replacement for replacement foot as first one had problem.
 

As I explained earlier, I doesn't matter on which side
the gimbal is but with a zoom, I would recommend on
the right side!
 

As I explained earlier, I doesn't matter on which side
the gimbal is but with a zoom, I would recommend on
the right side!
I see what you mean re the zoom ring, was just taking some pics as I said I would up them once I had all the pieces, obviously I had to get another tripod as well { so I told the wife }.
 
Back
Top