@Kevin Allan Flickr shows your photo as being taken in November 2015? FPOTY is for photos taken during this year since the start of FPOTY 2017, so it doesn't qualify unfortunately.
@Kevin Allan Flickr shows your photo as being taken in November 2015? FPOTY is for photos taken during this year since the start of FPOTY 2017, so it doesn't qualify unfortunately.
I presume we should be happy for @Kevin Allan to replace that shot with another tree one? I know it's generally not allowed, but I would see that pic as "not an entry", so replaceable!
BTW Kevin, it's a lovely shot!
I;m really sorry I didn't read the thread title properily and throught the thread was "new old film challange" type.
Will delete the image straight away
For next year, I'd seek to lobby that the scoring system be simplified such that the number of votes someone gets is the number of points they get in the ranking. In this instance, that would mean that @Carl Hall would get 10 points, myself, @RaglanSurf and @ChrisR would all get 7 points, @FishyFish would get 6 points, @Kevin Allan would get 5, etc etc. That way, it more accurately represents the overall quality of the images submitted, and eliminates the varying nature of the number of voters from the scoring system.
For that to work we'd need to maintain a high number of votes throughout the whole competition. I think the number of entries and votes falls as some people lose interest as the competition progresses. You'd probably find that people in the later months would be getting less points compared to those in the earlier months, for a reason they can't control. The number of voters has dropped for three months in a row now. In January we had 83 votes and this month it was 59. If the trend continues then we're looking at around 47 votes per month by December. I think it would be a good way of scoring points, but we'd need to keep the votes up through the year for it to be fair.
Interesting idea! It could mean places in the latter part of the year , (with usually fewer entries and potentially therefore fewer voters) having less influence? An analysis of the numbers of votes cast each month would help. A real advantage would be that everyone would be somewhere in the ranking, rather than some people being stuck on =18th with no points, which is a fairly miserable place to be!
Also, if we have 5 places for points each month, why not give us 5 votes each? That way we're all voting for the 5 shots we think deserve a place.
I decided to leave the number of votes at three, because I'm not certain how many people will actually enter yet... I think you need a lot of regular entries per month to make five votes a good idea. Don't want to vote for your favourite five when there are only six entries!
Is it worth starting a thread for 2018 discussion now? I know we're barely halfway through the year, but it would be good to hammer out any changes or improvements and have plenty of time to come up with suggestions and debate them at leisure rather than trying to do it all over Christmas.
In my view it's all running pretty smoothly the way it is though and @Carl Hall is doing a great job at the helm, so hopefully any changes will be relatively minor anyway.
Is it worth starting a thread for 2018 discussion now? I know we're barely halfway through the year, but it would be good to hammer out any changes or improvements and have plenty of time to come up with suggestions and debate them at leisure rather than trying to do it all over Christmas.
In my view it's all running pretty smoothly the way it is though and @Carl Hall is doing a great job at the helm, so hopefully any changes will be relatively minor anyway.
Here here!
Thank you chaps, I'm happy that you're happy with it. No sign of a coup anytime soon then!![]()
Not at all fella. The point is, there will never be a time when everyone is happy, and I feel that the undertone of these sorts of discussions is really just the desire to converge on a state where the fewest people are unhappy![]()
I vote for only voting for me... probably my only chance of ever winning the damn thing.![]()
... says the guy whose avatar strap line is "POTY (Film) 2015" in bright blue!![]()
So, yesterday evening I went out to Queensferry hoping for a nice sunset against the bridges (but realising as I drove that there was almost certainly too little cloud). Got a few shots, walked on the track away from Queensferry to try to get the rail bridge against the sun, went down to the rocks, decided to walk further along the beach to get the sunset more central, didn't notice a small stream had made some rocks wet and mossy, and went down with a crash! I went one way, tripod and camera the other. Lens seems OK, but I think I've comprehensively bent the viewfinder on my Pentax LX (replaceable, I hope), and also apparently unseated the mirror. I think it had better go off for a CLA! Also appear to have bent one of the legs of my tripod, as it won't fully close. Not a huge financial loss as it only cost me £5 in Oxfam, but a replacement will certainly cost a lot more.
I got off fairly lightly, egg-shaped lump on my arm and some grazes. I was a bit worried at first that 'd broken my arm again, but happily not.
As @srichards said on twitter, at least I didn't get marooned on an island! Everything has a silver lining...![]()
So, yesterday evening I went out to Queensferry hoping for a nice sunset against the bridges (but realising as I drove that there was almost certainly too little cloud). Got a few shots, walked on the track away from Queensferry to try to get the rail bridge against the sun, went down to the rocks, decided to walk further along the beach to get the sunset more central, didn't notice a small stream had made some rocks wet and mossy, and went down with a crash! I went one way, tripod and camera the other. Lens seems OK, but I think I've comprehensively bent the viewfinder on my Pentax LX (replaceable, I hope), and also apparently unseated the mirror. I think it had better go off for a CLA! Also appear to have bent one of the legs of my tripod, as it won't fully close. Not a huge financial loss as it only cost me £5 in Oxfam, but a replacement will certainly cost a lot more.
I got off fairly lightly, egg-shaped lump on my arm and some grazes. I was a bit worried at first that 'd broken my arm again, but happily not.
As @srichards said on twitter, at least I didn't get marooned on an island! Everything has a silver lining...![]()
I suppose, @Woodsy, an advantage of LF is that I would never have ventured onto the beach in the first place... hang on, there's good and bad bits to that!
Alternatively, if you'd got one of those clunky great wooden LF cameras and had been cut off by the tide you could have probably rowed back to the beach on it using your tripod as a paddle!![]()
Someone needs now to make a LF wooden camera that folds from a camera into a canoe...if it's light tight then it has to be water tight![]()
It might be time to hang up those cameras Chris and leave the dangerous photography to @Andysnap
See! always thinking![]()
So, £89 plus postage for a new finder from ffordes, £75 plus postage plus VAT as an estimated repair from Miles... the camera cost £169 from WYC, though that admittedly was a bargain. There are lots of high priced ones on the bay, plus a couple in the £210 range. But I don't like to give up on a camera...
Theoretically I could claim on my house insurance, but I suspect with excess and potentially raised premiums next year that's a bit pointless.
Aw Chris, sorry to hear about your offroading mishap! Might it be worth waiting for a cheap finder to appear on ebay? Or is it your main/favourite 35mm?
I've been out tonight and actually shot a roll of film, specifically for the theme, which is the first time this year (as my points tally shows...). I fired off a roll of Pan F 50 in my Yashica 635 and even included a couple of entirely deliberate multiple exposures (of course I didn't forget to wind on between shots..).
I have yet to get the hang of multi-exposures! Though I do keep looking at examples to try to work out the compositional techniques...