Manual all the time. I really don't understand why anyone would use AV or TV (or nikon equivalent) because surely if you can dial in +ve/-ve exposure somp, then you can shoot in manual?
Or am I missing something obvious?
Manual all the time. I really don't understand why anyone would use AV or TV (or nikon equivalent) because surely if you can dial in +ve/-ve exposure somp, then you can shoot in manual?
Or am I missing something obvious?
Because if light is changing rapidly (as can often happen outside) then manual values stay static whereas Av or Tv tracks the light levels with a given compensation.
Because if light is changing rapidly (as can often happen outside) then manual values stay static whereas Av or Tv tracks the light levels with a given compensation.
Do you have to keep the metering on evaluative for this? ie: the one where the camera considers the whole frame?
But what happens when you use Av/Tv in changing light against a changing background?
Then it's time to pack up and go home for a beer![]()
Which is the setting you use most, i go from Manual most of the time, then a few of the Auto settings if i am feeling lazy...
Regards Mark.
Which is the setting you use most, i go from Manual most of the time, then a few of the Auto settings if i am feeling lazy...
Regards Mark.
Manual, with the odd S thrown in for good measure
Manual is an expression of the purity of photography - which is then wasted by using the camera's own meter :bonk:
Manual & an external meter does make some sense, especially if it's a very tight spot-meter and you're using the zone system, though not much in the real world these days as all camera manufacturers product are fab at metering - with a little help from the user
Locking exposure or exp comp can solve just about anything as, if not more, quickly than in manual
Where manual comes in useful is for maintaining the same exposure while (for instance) zooming in or out - back to Weddings again... a head and shoulders of the bride and quick change to full length can mean the exposure on auto changes too which would look odd, so manual or exp lock is best
Does 'Manual' lead to a snob value - to some definitely yes
Does it deserve or or necessarily mean you're 'better' than the non-manual user - NO
Oh, and I use A most of the time, and M where it matters
DD
is this really true ?????, or a wind up i would think there is no passports to snobbery in this hobby, but then again i live and learn, i use manual because it's finally sinking in my potatoe of a brain that it's like years ago when the settings where on the len's and camera body.:bonk:
the cameras are always left set in TV mode (iso 400 shutter 1/500th, single shot ai servo autofocus with single point focus) and much of the work I do i would use these settings with or without compensation/fill flash.
if the light/conditions dictate then i use manual or maybe Av if i'm needing to be arty
Nope - not a wind up at all
It's quite common in Club-togging land to look well down on those who use auto anything, and look up to those who earn a living from togging
I confuse them all when I say I'm a Pro who uses Aperture Priority most of the time!
Snobbery abounds and snobs tend to be easily confused too
But then I was Manual only for the first 15 years as there was no option - perhaps if you consider it a better learning tool than auto it's got a point - for most shooting most of the time a good brain can make an auto setting work better/faster/easier
DD
When I'm shooting at a rally I generally set Tv mode to 1/125, aperture to the fastest the lens I'm using is capable (unless I'm using the 10-20 then I use f8) then I set manual to around 1/250th and whatever aperture is needed to get about the right exposure.
That means that the camera in any of the modes will be in the right ball park then I just switch between them depending on the type of shot I want to take.
would you attempt continuous shooting with them settings, and i realized my 400D is a bit slow at the AF or is it me getting quicker, am i finding short falls in the 400D already?????
Regards mark.