Why are you defending them? It's as if you're trying to deny me the right to be angry that I bought a game that should clearly have stayed in testing for six months longer than it did. And no, googling any game will not necessarily throw up hundreds of thousands of results - I play a lot of games, one or two new games a month on average, sometimes more, and I've never, ever encountered a game as full of bugs as this. Ever. And I've been playing games since I got my first computer in 1985, so I've played a lot. Skyrim's bugs are nothing short of appalling.
If Bethesda wanted to go and make a huge game with a huge world and an open style of gameplay, then they should have also embarked on a suitably extensive testing campaign too. If I recall correctly, there wasn't even a public beta before release, a monumentally myopic move on Bethesda's part, especially considering their already notorious reputation for buggy releases. Fallout 3, anyone?
A game is fundamentally broken when thousands of players are unable to complete parts of it. How you can sit there and deny that is a complete mystery to me.
You clearly love the game. Fine. I love it too. But loving something shouldn't blind you to its inexcusable faults. And considering the sheer number of bugs this game has produced, it is is inexcusable.