unfortunate for the lady concerned but shouldnt be any great cause for concern - she contracted it in west africa, and has had minimal contacts since her return to the uk. As was repeatedly said on the other thread Ebola isnt a major problem in a first world setting (its notable that despite dire predictions to the contrary neither the spanish nor the american infection of care workers led to an outbreak in either country)
Apart from all the people on the British Airways aircraft and airport.
for about the 4 millionth time you can't get ebola from being on the same aircraft as a carrier as its not airborne , you can only get it through large droplet transmission (that is blood, vomit etc) you could get it from a sneeze if they sneezed straight in your face and their mucus went in your eyes but not from breathing recirculated air. Ebola doesnt general cause coughs and sneezes anyway.
also she wasnt symptomatic while travelling anyway
4 millionth.
Links please, Dr Pete.
Who or CDC websites - do your own research (or read the other thread) - 4 millionth may be a 'slight' exageration but the last thread on ebola divided between people saying " I haz read the hotzone and/0r seen outbreak we're all gonnna die " and a smaller group of people who'd actually bothered to check their facts saying "FFS outbreak/hotzone etc is fiction, its not airbourne"
Neither the Dallas or madrid cases managed to infect anyone while in transit or outside the hospital environment (despite the Dallas index patient vomitting in the street) - this is because it isnt easily spread in an environment where people can wash theitr hands easily and don't eat bush meat or interact with dead bodies
So can I interest anyone in a NBC suit?
I'm afraid it would reduce the effectiveness of my tinfoil hat

So can I interest anyone in a NBC suit?
for about the 4 millionth time you can't get ebola from being on the same aircraft
All the Passengers on the flight are all being identified and located with a view to screening them for the virus - just incase. It sounds sensible to me.
When an infection occurs in humans, the virus can be spread to others through direct contact (through broken skin or mucous membranes in, for example, the eyes, nose, or mouth) with
- blood or body fluids (including but not limited to urine, saliva, sweat, feces, vomit, breast milk, and semen) of a person who is sick with Ebola
- objects (like needles and syringes) that have been contaminated with the virus
- infected fruit bats or primates (apes and monkeys)
We have another up here in Aberdeen tho.Meanwhile, they have taken her safely out of Scotland to a hospital that has a 100% record for curing Ebola.
We have another up here in Aberdeen tho.
Now, I'm getting worriedEven politicians are saying she probably doesn't have it.
Even politicians are saying she probably doesn't have it.

Just so long as it is possible then there is still a risk.
And another being patient being tested in the West Country as we speak.
Yes, that happens all the time. It's one of the ways we have of not suffering a Daily Mail size outbreak.
s***, i need to get tested thenFrom WHO Factsheet:-
"Men who have recovered from the disease can still transmit the virus through their semen for up to 7 weeks after recovery from illness."

s***, i need to get tested then![]()

Katie Hopkins has upset a few people again Tweeting: “Little sweaty jocks, sending us Ebola bombs in the form of sweaty Glaswegians just isn't cricket. Scottish NHS sucks.”
The outrage bus is on the move again....