- Messages
- 6,171
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- Yes
96/365 - Another close up flower shot but only because I got a new lens today - a Nikkor 28mm f2.8 AI-S - which is a manual focus lens!

Not bad for £60!

Not bad for £60!
Yes, they're quite friendlyNice shot, looks like you got quite close to them.
Yes it is - it's a very nice part of the world.Good picture; it mut be nice seeing them on the way to work![]()
It's a lovely area Marc, plenty to see (and photograph!)Lovely shot Dave. One day I'll get down to the New Forest to see them for myself.


nice composition as JD says and I love the kind of over blown washed out look, makes the scene dream like. That top stone looks like a good skimmer, did you skim it afterwards?
No, didn't think of skimming - far too many waves!Copied from the exif:
# Exposure Time (1 / Shutter Speed) = 1/8000 second = 0.00013 second
# Lens F-Number/F-Stop = 28/10 = F2.8
# Exposure Program = aperture priority (3)
# ISO Speed Ratings = 200

)
Thanks Julian. I did HDR on this as I wanted to get the foreground detail whilst still retaining the sky detail.Great for a first attempt I must say. I can see some halos on the trees in the background. Avoiding halos and avoid increasing noise is really the main thing to aim for I find. I still find HDR processing really hard and even when you think you have it cracked. I frequently find that there are some shots I really can't get right when HDR processing, some look fantastic with little effort (like my Old Wardour Castle shot) and others take ages and countless adjustments to get a half decent effect.
Thanks AlbyLooking pretty good to me Dave, quaint little church.![]()
Thanks KayLooks good to me too - I like that![]()
Sort of. This was actually two shots, one at 0EV and one at +2EV. I did this in CS3 using the Merge HDR option.The thing I find with HDR is that you need to pick a shot that HAS a high dynamic range or it just doesn't work. Yours does Dave, though I'm probably sure that you would have been able to achieve the same result by standard processing. I tend to find that what works best is when there is no extremes in highlights/shadows. The best HDR's have never been too overexposed or underexposed with the exposure compensation. If that makes any sense??