D80 or S5 pro?

disco41

disco41

Suspended / Banned
Messages
446
Name
Andy
Edit My Images
Yes
Basically my choice is one of the above.

I have three Nikon lens so really wanted to stay with them.

I know the Fuji is Nikon mount

So has anyone any thoughts as too which one i should spend my hard earned on...
 
For build quality and image quality I would think the S5 was streets ahead.

The D80 would handle higher ISO better I would think and be slightly fast frame rate. But I think you would be better off with the S5.

Depends what you will be shooting or your overall requirements.
 
Thanks Shutterman

I would be using it for a bit of everything really so it would need to jack of all trades.
Really want a D300 but cant justify the money fancied having a go at motorsport a mate has a Tiger race car that he races.
Is the AF in the fuji better than the Nikon for this sort of work ???
 
Some people will claim the S5 is to slow for motorsport. That doesn't appear to have stopped plenty of racing posts on Flickr from the S5 Pro.
 
disco41 said:
Thanks Shutterman

I would be using it for a bit of everything really so it would need to jack of all trades.
Really want a D300 but cant justify the money fancied having a go at motorsport a mate has a Tiger race car that he races.
Is the AF in the fuji better than the Nikon for this sort of work ???
Click to expand...

Not too sure but it is slower in writing files if you have the increased DR engaged. Have you thought about the trusty D200 that might suit you down to the ground.

Again its not as new as the D80 and does not handle noise as well but it is still a great camera. Would suit your needs I would think.

Nigel
 
PsiFox said:
Some people will claim the S5 is to slow for motorsport. That doesn't appear to have stopped plenty of racing posts on Flickr from the S5 Pro.
Click to expand...

There you go a man in the know pops ups...
 
Yeah thought of the D200 great camera

More research required me thinks :thinking:

Thanks for the rapid replies. :thumbs:
 
I'm also taking an interest in the S5 pro.
Looking at a review somewhere, there's this statement:

The downside is that the S5 is effectively only a 6.17 megapixel camera, since it has 6.17 million ‘S’ sensors and 6.17 million ‘R’ sensors. This may be a total of over 12 million photocells, but there are only 6.17 million cell sites generating image data. Despite this, the S5 produces final JPEG images that are 4256 x 2848 pixels, or 12.12 megapixels, and RAW files that are 3043 x 2036, or 6.98 megapixels, which will inevitably resurrect the old arguments about Fuji’s image interpolation that have been echoing around the forums and letters pages since the Super CCD was first introduced.

I'm confused.com
Can anyone explain what this means?????
 
Shutterman said:
The D80 would handle higher ISO better
Click to expand...

Nope, the D80 is the same as the D200. I'd estimate the S5 Pro is about 2/3rd of a stop better than the D200.

The D90 and D300 are a bit better than the S5 Pro, but the S5 Pro is better than any other DX Nikon camera (with the possible exception of the D40)
 
andy_fozzy said:
I'm also taking an interest in the S5 pro.
Looking at a review somewhere, there's this statement:

The downside is that the S5 is effectively only a 6.17 megapixel camera, since it has 6.17 million ‘S’ sensors and 6.17 million ‘R’ sensors. This may be a total of over 12 million photocells, but there are only 6.17 million cell sites generating image data. Despite this, the S5 produces final JPEG images that are 4256 x 2848 pixels, or 12.12 megapixels, and RAW files that are 3043 x 2036, or 6.98 megapixels, which will inevitably resurrect the old arguments about Fuji’s image interpolation that have been echoing around the forums and letters pages since the Super CCD was first introduced.

I'm confused.com
Can anyone explain what this means?????
Click to expand...

Its a 6 megapixel camera, with an extra 6 megapixels dedicated to dynamic range improvement. These "R" pixels do not contribute towards vertical or horizontal resolution.
 
puddleduck said:
Nope, the D80 is the same as the D200. I'd estimate the S5 Pro is about 2/3rd of a stop better than the D200.

The D90 and D300 are a bit better than the S5 Pro, but the S5 Pro is better than any other DX Nikon camera (with the possible exception of the D40)
Click to expand...

You sure PD... I always found my D80 much better at the Higher Iso's than my D200.

Especially when doing long exposures.

Nigel
 
Yes, I'm sure.

For long exposures, I would not really recommend the S5 Pro, as it doesn't have dark current subtraction. Its fine, but you'll see hot pixels once you get much past 8 to 10 seconds.
 
Well I shall bow to your knowledge....

Always seemed to be better for me but I might have been doing something that dragged the D200 down. who knows..

Nigel
 
The D200 will underexpose in low light. The D80 tends to over-expose. Over-exposer helps s/n ratio. I often wondered if this was deliberate :)

Equalize exposure, WB and shoot RAW and its the same more or less (the D80 is better in JPEG for sure)
 
Neither the D200 or the D80 (which is essentially just a plastic-bodied consumer version of the D200) are great at much above 800 iso. The D80 and so I would assume the D200, is pretty awful at long exposures too..
 
now thats done it how the hell do i make my mind up now......:lol::thumbs:
 
If it's between a D80 and a D200, I'd take a D200 for the better build quality. The Fuji isn't really a general purpose camera the way the Nikons are. I only use mine for portrait/still life work, for motorsport the D300 comes out...
 
you see now thats really what i wont (D300) AF much more suited to motorsport

need to save a bit longer i know i will only regret not getting the camera i really wont.

:nikon: :thankyou:
 
The price is coming down almost daily on stuff like the D300, I noticed up at the top of the page that the price difference between a grey import and a UK one with 2 years warranty was just over a tenner.....

Remember clear-r-gear (Jessops) have been known to list refurb D300s with a 12 month guarantee on Ebay for £640 delivered....
 
£899 from Grays:thumbs:
 
Flash In The Pan said:
The price is coming down almost daily on stuff like the D300, I noticed up at the top of the page that the price difference between a grey import and a UK one with 2 years warranty was just over a tenner.....

Remember clear-r-gear (Jessops) have been known to list refurb D300s with a 12 month guarantee on Ebay for £640 delivered....
Click to expand...

Yes and you know who usually snaps them up in 3 seconds to relist a week later at a much higher price.
 
puddleduck said:
For long exposures, I would not really recommend the S5 Pro, as it doesn't have dark current subtraction. Its fine, but you'll see hot pixels once you get much past 8 to 10 seconds.
Click to expand...

Ditto that. If you want to shoot VERY long exposures, forget the S5.

The dynamic range however, impressive! :eek:
 
puddleduck said:
Yes, I'm sure.

For long exposures, I would not really recommend the S5 Pro, as it doesn't have dark current subtraction. Its fine, but you'll see hot pixels once you get much past 8 to 10 seconds.
Click to expand...

It's more work, certainly, but just do what the Nikons do manually. Cover the lens up (with the cap, for example) and take another exposure, then overlay in Photoshop and subtract.
 
Flash In The Pan said:
Remember clear-r-gear (Jessops) have been known to list refurb D300s with a 12 month guarantee on Ebay for £640 delivered....
Click to expand...


For about 10 seconds, i wouldn't hold my breath waiting to get a D300 at £640
 
Flash In The Pan said:
The D80 and so I would assume the D200, is pretty awful at long exposures too..
Click to expand...

I've been doing 5-20 minute exposures with my D200 set at ISO100 fine. I wouldn't say this is an issue really (I can also provide full sized samples if you want). As a D200 user I'm quite tempted by the S5 Pro for the dynamic range but I really like how rugged my D200 is and don't have any reason to change to any other DX body. FX is another storry.....sigh.
 
Mr_T said:
As a D200 user I'm quite tempted by the S5 Pro for the dynamic range but I really like how rugged my D200 is and don't have any reason to change to any other DX body.
Click to expand...

What makes you think the identical S5 is any less rugged?
 
I'd buy the S5 pro because at the current refurb price of £350 you could try it out, if you didn't like it you'd easily clear £350 for it on ebay so think of it as a free extended trial :)
 
Liveview on the S5 Pro isn't very functional. You can't scroll around the view at all, just look straight down the lens.
 
disco41 said:
Basically my choice is one of the above.

I have three Nikon lens so really wanted to stay with them.

I know the Fuji is Nikon mount

So has anyone any thoughts as too which one i should spend my hard earned on...
Click to expand...

All I can really say, I feel the S5 pro blows the D200 for out of the camera JPEGS, and the raws are far more flexible in terms of range of colours etc. I would use it before my D200 every time.
 
EdinburghGary said:
All I can really say, I feel the S5 pro blows the D200 for out of the camera JPEGS, and the raws are far more flexible in terms of range of colours etc. I would use it before my D200 every time.
Click to expand...

WHAT the S5 and D200 are the same camera in body only the software running them is completely different the S5 is absolutely fantastic as a portrait tool but falls down on fast action yet the D200 has a couple of MP less But its not interpolated like the s5 so really the D200 is the better [S1]NIKON, NIKON, NIKON[/S1]
 
But I do have to admit the true colour representation on my missus S3 is fantastic
 
Please read the rules : Trading outside the classifieds forums is prohibited.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top