Mud
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 527
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Got mine this week as well, awesome bit of kit isn't it![]()
It's my 2nd, and suddenly I find myself wanting a 3rd!
Got mine this week as well, awesome bit of kit isn't it![]()
Even if the D300/D300s were capable of 9fps, if you're shooting long exposures, chances are you're not going to be shooting that fast anyway.4. Long Exposure Delay must be turned off because it will not give you the full frame rate speed that you wish to use. For example, you would like to use 9 frames per second but with Long Exp. Delay turned on it will drop to 3 4 frames per second.
I was going to shoot our county dart match today with my D300 & 70-200 f2.8 lens but it's quite a dark nightclub with the stage barely lit apart from the board area so the players would show up as silhouette's, also the practise area is much the same.
I had a try in my living room with just a lamp on and all i could get was 1/20th sec @ 135mm f2.8 and on ISO 1250, anymore and the noise would become unacceptable. I really need a D3 on my lens to make it far more worthwhile, any comments would be great.
It is? I didn't actually look at this feature in the manual yet, but my D200 shot WAY more than 100 images in a sequence using the interval timer. In fact, going through my D200's menu options right now, it caps out at 8,991 images (9 images per interval, to a maximum of 999 intervals).
Just pulled out the D300s to check its menu and it has the same option. Up to 9 images per interval, up to 999 intervals for potentially 8,991 total images.
npCheers for the 1:1 here![]()
On that basis, you'd expect the next attempt to work just fine but an exposure time of 30sec with an interval of 31sec actually gives me 31 sec between shots (so the second shot starts 61 seconds after the first, or 31 seconds after the first has ended). This happens every time, from the first time I tried back in July (before firmware was updated) to just last Friday.
Hi folks. This is only my 2nd post so if you've seen it before, i apologise. If it's settings for the D300 your after,then read on. A friend of mine spotted this on you-tube and typed it out for convenience. Link to you-tube is at the end
Action shooting settings for Nikon D3 D700 _ D300
1. The Shooting Menu:- The RAW setting must be set for uncompressed quality, so, the Raw quality remains the same to allow larger amount of control to adjust the Raw files in post-processing. With this feature set the colour rendering and sharpness can be lost.
Which leads me to the conclusion that whoever made that video is just making it up as they go along.![]()
Shooting manually you won't. All it will do is adjust the meter to show you what it's reading and where it thinks you should be. You still have to rotate the dials to get that exposure.
For example, if you're in manual mode with no EV adjustment set, your meter might tell you to shoot 1/125th, f/8 @ ISO200. Telling your meter to go -2EV might tell you to shoot 1/500th, f/8 @ ISO200, but it won't rotate the dials for you.![]()
Thread Bumpie...
For all you D300/D300s users, what lens are you using with your body?
I am thinking of a walk about lenses but not sure what I want, 16-85mm or something a little more?
Thread Bumpie...
For all you D300/D300s users, what lens are you using with your body?
70-200mm f/2.8 VR mostly, but also a bunch of old M42 lenses. Sigma 10-20mm sometimes.For all you D300/D300s users, what lens are you using with your body?
For all you D300/D300s users, what lens are you using with your body?
I am thinking of a walk about lenses but not sure what I want, 16-85mm or something a little more?
Hi, I'm looking for a bit of guidance.
My eyesight is not the best and I have varifocal glasses which I wear all the time. The problem is that when looking through the viewfinder, getting the "right" bit of the lens on my glasses is a bit of mucking around, and if I remove my glasses I can't get the framing grid etc. in the viewfinder in focus as there isn't enough range on the diopter adjustment control for my dodgy eyes.
I've been reading about the DK21M and was wondering if anybody on here uses one with "dodgy" eyes and finds it any help to overcome such a situation? Some reports suggest it is only any value for Macro work as you only see the central portion of the viewfinder and have to move your eye around to be able to see the top, bottom, or sides.
Any input gratefully received. Many thanks.
I tried the DK21 just for a bit of extra magnification and some of the info in the viewfinder became unsharp.
David Busch's Nikon 300s book states "Should the available correction be insufficient, Nikon offers nine different Diopter adjustment viewfinder correction lenses ranging from -5 to +3".
May be worth asking Nikon UK.
Excellent. Many thanks for the pointer, I'll give them a try.![]()
Don't know if you are registered with Nikon, but their email help is quite good:-
https://nikoneurope-en.custhelp.com...count%2Foverview/session/L3NpZC90dDQ0b0tXag==
David Busch's Nikon 300s book states "Should the available correction be insufficient, Nikon offers nine different Diopter adjustment viewfinder correction lenses ranging from -5 to +3".
May be worth asking Nikon UK.
Turns out that the item I needed is a DK-20C. Went down to Park Cameras this morning and got one (+2) which now allows me to focus the viewfinder screen correctly.
The only issue is that the DK-20C has a flange for attaching an eyecup, but the gap between the body and flange is very narrow so the the DK-24 eyecup wouldn't fit back on. Judicious use of a needle file enlarged the flange gap enough to be able to re-fit the standard eyecup again, and all is now great.
Thanks very much for your help in pointing me in the right direction Dougie.![]()
i focus on the birds eye, i see that focus is locked, keeping button half depressed i recompose, take the shot. When i check result in View NX it shows focus point to be in the middle of the bird!!