Cartoon exhibition cancelled in London

Like I said, I appreciate that might be your take on Christianity, but there are plenty of 'Christians' clinging onto Old Testament teachings and they'd probably claim to be more Christian than you. :confused:

As Jesus said, "By their works you will recognise them" :)
 
And Harry Potter could fly on a broom and speak directly to snakes.
No less believable.
 
The question that springs to my mind from that little exchange is this; is God irrelevant to Christians?
 
err correct me if i'm wrong phil ,but surely your quoting the wrong god from the wrong book ,as far as i'm aware christians are followers of jesus there religion didn't exist as such till circa the 2nd century a.d when it was taken up by the romans to hold together there failing empire .
if your going quote about christians in that context/time frame you might as well include the babylonians and assyrians to which brings us full circle somewhat ,in fact the whole region is full of a war thats been raging under the treetops for several thousand years ," by the rivers of babylon i lay me down " springs to mind
So doesn't the bible include the Old Testament? Am I mistaken? Or are you whitewashing the behaviour of many 'Christians', by pretending that many of them aren't still clinging onto Old Testament beliefs.

We both know that they are, so what really is your point, rather than obfuscation?
 
As Jesus said, "By their works you will recognise them" :)
And St Paul said about Slaves...
Ephesians 6:5-9: "Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ; Not with eyeservice, as menpleasers; but as the servants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart; With good will doing service, as to the Lord, and not to men: Knowing that whatsoever good thing any man doeth, the same shall he receive of the Lord, whether he be bond or free. And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him."

So let's not try to pretend that Christianity is all about 'love thy neighbour', I know too many Christians with dubious moral values to take that concept seriously.
 
And St Paul said about Slaves...
Ephesians 6:5-9: "Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ; Not with eyeservice, as menpleasers; but as the servants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart; With good will doing service, as to the Lord, and not to men: Knowing that whatsoever good thing any man doeth, the same shall he receive of the Lord, whether he be bond or free. And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him."

So let's not try to pretend that Christianity is all about 'love thy neighbour', I know too many Christians with dubious moral values to take that concept seriously.
Slavery was permitted from Israelite times and was of direct benefit to the slave, providing a means of support rather than being left destitute ... as Paul says in your quoted scripture, it was for slaves to be honest to their masters and for masters to be just and kind to their slaves. Under the Mosaic law a slave had to be set free in the Jubilee Year, whatever the terms of the slavery agreement.
Slavery under Jewish Law was quite different to the form of slavery that we have come to know today e.g. the traffic of slaves from Africa in the past, or the people-smuggling of the present day. In Israelite times many slaves preferred to stay with their masters rather than accept their freedom and provision was made for them to do so.
If you know "Christians with dubious moral values" does that not indicate that they are not following the example and pattern of Christ and therefore are not truly 'Christians'?
 
Then I shall ask you directly about your view.
As I have already said, one who follows the example and teachings of Jesus Christ ... the term 'Christian' comes from Christ.
Anyone can call themselves "Christian" but that doesn't mean they are, any more than my calling myself a photographer automatically means that I am.
 
As I have already said, one who follows the example and teachings of Jesus Christ ... the term 'Christian' comes from Christ.
Anyone can call themselves "Christian" but that doesn't mean they are, any more than my calling myself a photographer automatically means that I am.

The original question was, "is god irrelevant to Christians?"

By Christian, I mean someone who follows the example and teachings of Jesus Christ.
 
Slavery was permitted from Israelite times and was of direct benefit to the slave, providing a means of support rather than being left destitute ... as Paul says in your quoted scripture, it was for slaves to be honest to their masters and for masters to be just and kind to their slaves. Under the Mosaic law a slave had to be set free in the Jubilee Year, whatever the terms of the slavery agreement.
Slavery under Jewish Law was quite different to the form of slavery that we have come to know today e.g. the traffic of slaves from Africa in the past, or the people-smuggling of the present day. In Israelite times many slaves preferred to stay with their masters rather than accept their freedom and provision was made for them to do so.
If you know "Christians with dubious moral values" does that not indicate that they are not following the example and pattern of Christ and therefore are not truly 'Christians'?
Various members of The Church were paid handsome compensation by the British taxpayer when slavery was abolished.

And plenty of Christians living dubious moral lives still consider themselves Christians, some of them were protected by quite senior church members who knew they were abusing children for years, of course you are entitled to your opinion on their 'Christianity' but it's not for you or I to judge, and whilst the church condones or ignores immoral and illegal behaviour, I'm not sure it's possible to find a fair arbiter of the truth.
 
As I have already said, one who follows the example and teachings of Jesus Christ ... the term 'Christian' comes from Christ.
Anyone can call themselves "Christian" but that doesn't mean they are, any more than my calling myself a photographer automatically means that I am.

And Jesus was merely the mouthpiece for his "father", making the old testament completely relevant.
Makes me chuckle how folk pick and choose the parts of their chosen religion to suit themselves.
 
Well of course none of your 5 points refer to Christian times, hence do not provide evidence of justification for Christians committing atrocities in God's name ... if you don't accept that a "Christian", is a follower of Christ, what would you say a Christian is?
Christ preached and taught his followers to be peaceable and to seek peace (Matthew 5:9), to love their enemies (Matthew 5:44) and to be tolerant (Matthew 7:1).
Whilst many might chose to use the bible to justify their own actions, that does not mean that the bible's message supports their actions or that just because they use it they are Christians, in fact their actions condemn them (Matthew 7:21-23).

What about Mathew 10-34 " Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." and for that matter 10-35 " for I came to set a man against his father and a daughter against her mother"

or Luke 12-51 "Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division. "
 
Always look on the bright side of life , book of Brian chapter 10 verse 269064 ,.phil v you have been caught out spouting complete crap under the pretence of trying to appear knowledgeable ,man up ,grow a pair and stop pontificating :bat::bat:
 
  • Like
Reactions: ST4
Always look on the bright side of life , book of Brian chapter 10 verse 269064 ,.phil v you have been caught out spouting complete crap under the pretence of trying to appear knowledgeable ,man up ,grow a pair and stop pontificating :bat::bat:
Well it's a good job I looked, because you didn't have the balls (or intelligence) to tag me.

If I've said something that's not factually correct, I'm happy for you to discuss further, but stop waffling on without a point.

However: If that's a genuine threat of violence, I'm always up for a laugh :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Not to mention it's a very 'Christian' response (old fashioned type, not the hippy 'turn the other cheek' variety).

I've 'grown a pair' is there anything you can do to back this up? Or is it just bluster.

And we'll done on 'pontificate', but rather an ironic choice of word ;)
 
Last edited:
How about Mark 6:11

"Any city that doesn't "receive" the followers of Jesus will be destroyed in a manner even more savage than that of Sodom and Gomorrah."

Yes..peacable folks these christians.
 
Last edited:
And Jesus was merely the mouthpiece for his "father", making the old testament completely relevant.
Makes me chuckle how folk pick and choose the parts of their chosen religion to suit themselves.

The old testament is completely relevant, but even a cursory skim through the bible will show you a progression in human interaction with God. Why do you think Christian don't follow the Mosaic law? It is also important to understand the difference between historical accounts of what people did from what God required them to do, an example being polygamy vs monogamy.

As for genocide, with present western thinking that's utterly horrid, though you'll find a fair number that would like some types of criminals killed in horrible ways. The peoples that were destroyed were ritually sacrificing their children as part of their religion, among other practices. How would you feel about that people-group if they were still active in 21st century western Europe?

What about Mathew 10-34 " Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." and for that matter 10-35 " for I came to set a man against his father and a daughter against her mother"

or Luke 12-51 "Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division. "

It is as helpful to extract a few verses that appear to fit an argument as it is to pick a random page in a Canon manual in the hope it will explain how to manually change aperture settings. And sadly Christians are often guilty of such 'unhelpfulness' too. So what is the context for the Matthew verses you quoted? Jesus is sending out His disciples alone, without him. He starts off telling them to take no supplies and to stay with willing people along the way before warning them that they will be persecuted for following Him. For instance: 21 “Brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child; children will rebel against their parents and have them put to death. 22 You will be hated by everyone because of me," (it's worth reading the chapter if you actually want to get an understanding). The meaning then becomes easy to see, and that those who follow Jesus will, at times, be persecuted by those who do not. Which, as we know, still happens in some places.


And St Paul said about Slaves...
Ephesians 6:5-9: "Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ; Not with eyeservice, as menpleasers; but as the servants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart; With good will doing service, as to the Lord, and not to men: Knowing that whatsoever good thing any man doeth, the same shall he receive of the Lord, whether he be bond or free. And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him."

So let's not try to pretend that Christianity is all about 'love thy neighbour', I know too many Christians with dubious moral values to take that concept seriously.

Lets have it in modern English.
"5-8 Servants, respectfully obey your earthly masters but always with an eye to obeying the real master, Christ. Don’t just do what you have to do to get by, but work heartily, as Christ’s servants doing what God wants you to do. And work with a smile on your face, always keeping in mind that no matter who happens to be giving the orders, you’re really serving God. Good work will get you good pay from the Master, regardless of whether you are slave or free. 9 Masters, it’s the same with you. No abuse, please, and no threats. You and your servants are both under the same Master in heaven. He makes no distinction between you and them."

Language changes, even over a single lifetime. Use of a word like fear carries meanings for us that doesn't fit the original meaning well and distorts understanding.


How about Mark 6:11

"Any city that doesn't "receive" the followers of Jesus will be destroyed in a manner even more savage than that of Sodom and Gomorrah."

Yes..peacable folks these christians.

Mark 6: 11
"11 And if any place will not welcome you or listen to you, leave that place and shake the dust off your feet as a testimony against them.”"

???

No fire & brimstone mentioned in there. But since I think I know what you're getting at rather than what you said, the most likely meaning was that the judgement against those in Sodom and Gomorrah would be less severe than the towns that rejected the message of Jesus because S&G had not had a chance to either know or reject Jesus.

I rather suspect this is a waste of time - yours and mine - because no amount of reasoned argument will make any of us change our beliefs.

Sleep well guys & gals. :)
 
...Lets have it in modern English.
"5-8 Servants, respectfully obey your earthly masters but always with an eye to obeying the real master, Christ. Don’t just do what you have to do to get by, but work heartily, as Christ’s servants doing what God wants you to do. And work with a smile on your face, always keeping in mind that no matter who happens to be giving the orders, you’re really serving God. Good work will get you good pay from the Master, regardless of whether you are slave or free. 9 Masters, it’s the same with you. No abuse, please, and no threats. You and your servants are both under the same Master in heaven. He makes no distinction between you and them."

Language changes, even over a single lifetime. Use of a word like fear carries meanings for us that doesn't fit the original meaning well and distorts understanding.

...
I appreciate you're a nice bloke Toni and your faith is important to you, but...
We can reinterpret what the bible said about slavery, and it's a long time ago.

But this, not such a long time ago, and more along the lines discussed above.
 
Then we should look intelligently at the size of the actual risk, like I said, I'm not defending Islamist nutters, but in Western Europe you're much more likely to be killed by a non- religious terrorist, and even when it comes to religious terrorists, Islamists still aren't the greatest threat.'

Right now, in this day and age, I really doubt this. The bulk of the security risk and terror attacks is coming from Muslims, extremist ones, but Muslims never the less.

Nevermind the cultural erosion, dramatic increase in crime in places like Sweden due to unprecedented numbers of Muslim migrants moving in, and the tensions caused as they cling vehemently to their way of life which is so different to modern western european life.

A banker, a factory worker and a Muslim immigrant are sat in a restaurant, the waiter delivers 12 biscuits. Straight away, the banker takes 11 of them, then before anyone else can speak, he says to the factory worker; 'You should watch that Muslim, he's after your biscuit'

You have a thing about banks, I do not.
 
The original question was, "is god irrelevant to Christians?"

By Christian, I mean someone who follows the example and teachings of Jesus Christ.

Then yes, God is relevant to a Christian ... just as God was relevant to his Son Jesus Christ, (as said, from whom the term 'Christian' was formed).
However many may call themselves 'Christian' but by their actions prove that God is irrelevant to them ... whilst all men & women are sinful we do have a ransom for sin through the death of Christ Jesus, however God is not 'fooled' by the claims and outward appearance of a man, He examines the heart and judges accordingly.
So anyone can claim to be a 'Christian' whilst carrying on a life totally contrary to Christ's teachings, but in the end it will be to no avail, as in Matthew 7:21-23 mentioned above...
21 “Not everybody who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will get into the kingdom of heaven. Only those who do the will of my Father who is in heaven will enter. 22 On the Judgment Day, many people will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, didn’t we prophesy in your name and expel demons in your name and do lots of miracles in your name?’ 23 Then I’ll tell them, ‘I’ve never known you. Get away from me, you people who do wrong.’
 
Right now, in this day and age, I really doubt this. The bulk of the security risk and terror attacks is coming from Muslims, extremist ones, but Muslims never the less.
Nevermind the cultural erosion, dramatic increase in crime in places like Sweden due to unprecedented numbers of Muslim migrants moving in, and the tensions caused as they cling vehemently to their way of life which is so different to modern western european life.
...
No,
The bulk of the security risk and terror attacks that you are being fed by popular media is coming from Muslims
Here's what the statistics look like...
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9a/Terrorist_Attacks_in_the_EU_by_Affiliation.png

Now I don't live in Sweden (neither do you), but maybe you could actually look up their crime statistics rather than swallowing the story the media is showing you? I'd guess the truth is far less dramatic than you believe.

...You have a thing about banks, I do not.
I thought Irony was something only Americans didn't understand :D

But as I have time...

The point of the joke is that the rich and powerful are taking your money on a daily basis, and one of the tactics they use to cover their tracks is to point a finger at 'foreigners'. Reading your response, people might just conclude that those tactics are working perfectly. :p
 
Then yes, God is relevant to a Christian ... just as God was relevant to his Son Jesus Christ, (as said, from whom the term 'Christian' was formed).
However many may call themselves 'Christian' but by their actions prove that God is irrelevant to them ... whilst all men & women are sinful we do have a ransom for sin through the death of Christ Jesus, however God is not 'fooled' by the claims and outward appearance of a man, He examines the heart and judges accordingly.
So anyone can claim to be a 'Christian' whilst carrying on a life totally contrary to Christ's teachings, but in the end it will be to no avail, as in Matthew 7:21-23 mentioned above...

Or. There is no god.





Disclaimer. Other deities are available and are equally as credible.
 
Then yes, God is relevant to a Christian ... just as God was relevant to his Son Jesus Christ, (as said, from whom the term 'Christian' was formed).
However many may call themselves 'Christian' but by their actions prove that God is irrelevant to them ... whilst all men & women are sinful we do have a ransom for sin through the death of Christ Jesus, however God is not 'fooled' by the claims and outward appearance of a man, He examines the heart and judges accordingly.
So anyone can claim to be a 'Christian' whilst carrying on a life totally contrary to Christ's teachings, but in the end it will be to no avail, as in Matthew 7:21-23 mentioned above...
It's good you see it like this.. But how do you get to judge.
Whilst you can say these people aren't 'Christian', they would describe themselves as such. And whether it's institutionalised brutality or just a little bit of casual Racism, they do it in the name of your God, whether you like that or not, it's still factually correct.
 
The point of the joke is that the rich and powerful are taking your money on a daily basis, and one of the tactics they use to cover their tracks is to point a finger at 'foreigners'. Reading your response, people might just conclude that those tactics are working perfectly. :p

How are the rich and powerful taking MY money (ie the money I work for) on a daily basis. I sell my time for an agreed rate, work the required hours and do what they require of me in the time I agree to to sell to my employer.

I'd argue through taxation the poor, incpabable, weak and lazy are taking my money on a daily basis by taxing me too much. The man or woman in the better house, with the better car and better job takes nothing from me.
 
How are the rich and powerful taking MY money (ie the money I work for) on a daily basis. I sell my time for an agreed rate, work the required hours and do what they require of me in the time I agree to to sell to my employer.

I'd argue through taxation the poor, incpabable, weak and lazy are taking my money on a daily basis by taxing me too much. The man or woman in the better house, with the better car and better job takes nothing from me.
You would argue that...
Why?
Who told you it's the poor who are getting most from the tax system?
Why did they tell you that?
Don't rich people work in industries subsidised by taxes? Did you ignore the earlier posts about employers paying crap wages being 'state subsidised' to do so in the form of 'tax credits' to employees? Or that landlords are the actual recipients of housing benefit? Is this all a bit too complicated for you? Just because someone lives a fairly normal life, in a normal job, with nice kids and a nice car, don't assume your taxes aren't supporting that lifestyle - they might well be.

And how did you find the statistics about Muslim terrorism?

Steve, it'd be good for all of us if you took up a pastime called 'thinking', it's the opposite of the pastime 'reading the right wing press', it will enhance your quality of life, enable you to love other human beings a little more and be less suspicious of people you don't know.

Oddly they're also 'Christian values', but clearly your 'faith' doesn't stretch further than a belief that your cultural heritage is superior to other peoples.
 
It's good you see it like this.. But how do you get to judge.
Whilst you can say these people aren't 'Christian', they would describe themselves as such. And whether it's institutionalised brutality or just a little bit of casual Racism, they do it in the name of your God, whether you like that or not, it's still factually correct.

Firstly I don't judge ... God is the judge, but anyone who purports to be a 'Christian' and claims to represent Christ must live up to Christ's teachings and example. As I look around I see many people claiming to be 'Christian', some prove to be paedophile priests, others are shown as being liars and cheats and so on ... I don't judge them but I do see the hypocrisy of their claim to be 'Christian' and know that by their actions they belie their claim.
Of course everyone makes mistakes, says something thoughtless or does something wrong at times ... we are all imperfect people but there is a difference in one who practices sinful conduct. Even with the practiser of sin, people can genuinely repent and turn around from their course of conduct to a life of living up to the teachings and example of Christ Jesus and God shows he will accept their change of heart ... but He is not one who can be fooled, he knows what everyone truly is.
The other aspect of it all is that those claiming to be 'Christian' whilst acting contrary to the teachings and example of Christ actually harm the term 'Christian' as others look at what they are doing and say, effectively, "Well if that's what being a Christian means, then I want none of it!".
As Paul said in Romans 2:21-23...
21 You teach others, so why don’t you teach yourself? You tell them not to steal, but you yourself steal. 22 You say they must not commit adultery, but you yourself are guilty of that sin. You hate idols, but you steal them from their temples. 23 You are so proud that you have God’s law, but you bring shame to God by breaking his law. 24 As the Scriptures say, “People in other nations insult God because of you.
 
You would argue that...
Why?
Who told you it's the poor who are getting most from the tax system?
Why did they tell you that?
Don't rich people work in industries subsidised by taxes? Did you ignore the earlier posts about employers paying crap wages being 'state subsidised' to do so in the form of 'tax credits' to employees? Or that landlords are the actual recipients of housing benefit? Is this all a bit too complicated for you? Just because someone lives a fairly normal life, in a normal job, with nice kids and a nice car, don't assume your taxes aren't supporting that lifestyle - they might well be.

And how did you find the statistics about Muslim terrorism?


Of all the recent terror attacks, even this year, they are all Muslim cases. I understand the majority of Muslims are decent people, but the religion when you read up some of its teachings is IMHO not a pleasant one. Name one good thing it has brought western europe other than some nice architecture in southern spain. You don't need stastics to prove an absolute truth.

Don't rich people work in industries subsidised by taxes?: As do many many more people - what is your point. You moaned about Thatcher closing the mines, that was state subsidised. Is it only poor peoples jobs that matter to you?. Did you ignore the earlier posts about employers paying crap wages being 'state subsidised' to do so in the form of 'tax credits' to employees? Tax credits were a labour party phenomenon and the Tories who you hate are trying to kerb this culture. .Or that landlords are the actual recipients of housing benefit? This was something that really grew in the Blair and Brown era, Is this all a bit too complicated for you? Just because someone lives a fairly normal life, in a normal job, with nice kids and a nice car, don't assume your taxes aren't supporting that lifestyle - they might well be.Yes, I see a lot of public sector staff who typically were rewarded with low salaries but great job security and pension security now on private sector like salaries. Nurses in new BMWs, trainee teachers in brand new build posh flats, middle managers who are completely expendible in new E class Mercedes.Yes, my taxes are supporting over paid public sector staff. Us private sector pay for all this.

You might what to look at HMRC tax bands, and see that the more you earn, they more tax you pay both relatively and absolutely. The rich pay in, the poor take out. Simple maths.


Steve, it'd be good for all of us if you took up a pastime called 'thinking', it's the opposite of the pastime 'reading the right wing press', it will enhance your quality of life, enable you to love other human beings a little more and be less suspicious of people you don't know.

Oddly they're also 'Christian values', but clearly your 'faith' doesn't stretch further than a belief that your cultural heritage is superior to other peoples.

I spend a great deal of time thinking, and none of what I said is astrophysics or rocket science.
 
Makes me chuckle how folk pick and choose the parts of their chosen religion to suit themselves.


Why? Because someone is a Cristian doesn't mean you have to blindly follow every piece of docterine that comes from on high, or blindly follow a book which is for a very large part made up or lost through centuries of translation.

Taking a thinking, adaptive approach rather then an everything literal one is, I think, the only way any religion has a place in modern life. And it still has a place, albeit one that needs to evolve.

It always confuses people I have a science based PhD and am a Christian. I don't think I'm a religous nutter. I hope when I had the pleasure of meeting you didn't leave thinking that of me. As I have friends I assume I'm not.

I don't believe in Virgin births, and I think the churches preChing on condoms in Africa is outrageous.

Equally though I think that an anti church argument that quotes the Old Testament as its source is probably fairly weak
 
Of all the recent terror attacks, even this year, they are all Muslim cases. I understand the majority of Muslims are decent people, but the religion when you read up some of its teachings is IMHO not a pleasant one. Name one good thing it has brought western europe other than some nice architecture in southern spain. You don't need stastics to prove an absolute truth.

...
So even with a nice pretty picture you fail to accept that your opinion is simply coloured by the press rather than actual facts.:thinking:
You really do need statistics to prove an absolute truth, because if the facts say something that disagrees with what you believe, then your belief isn't an absolute truth, it's an opinion, what's more it's an opinion that's easy to disprove.

...
Don't rich people work in industries subsidised by taxes?: As do many many more people - what is your point. You moaned about Thatcher closing the mines, that was state subsidised. Is it only poor peoples jobs that matter to you?...

Miners weren't poor, my point is simple, the mines were closed to break the unions, not because we couldn't afford to subsidise them. Again a case of political dogma overruling common sense. Of course you'd agree that breaking the Unions was a good thing, because you're happy to have your paid holidays, weekends and a decent standard of living, where of course that makes you lucky, because in large parts of the economy those rights are now being eroded, but of course it doesn't affect you and the Daily Mail aren't complaining about it, so it's not important.

...Did you ignore the earlier posts about employers paying crap wages being 'state subsidised' to do so in the form of 'tax credits' to employees? Tax credits were a labour party phenomenon and the Tories who you hate are trying to kerb this culture. .Or that landlords are the actual recipients of housing benefit? This was something that really grew in the Blair and Brown era, Is this all a bit too complicated for you? ..
And because the government was a Labour one is that a policy I should agree with, as you would know if you'd read my post, tax credits were the wrong way to spend that money, encouraging employment by subsidising the workforce directly has created employers who believe it's OK to pay low wages to increase profits, meanwhile the welfare budget balloons and everyone blames the working poor.
And Thatcher was responsible for removing the cap on Housing benefit in order to fuel the buy to rent sector, which had a short term benefit for the economy but is one of the largest factors stopping the economy growing properly. Again, Dogma being used instead of Economics.

...
... Just because someone lives a fairly normal life, in a normal job, with nice kids and a nice car, don't assume your taxes aren't supporting that lifestyle - they might well be.Yes, I see a lot of public sector staff who typically were rewarded with low salaries but great job security and pension security now on private sector like salaries. Nurses in new BMWs, trainee teachers in brand new build posh flats, middle managers who are completely expendible in new E class Mercedes.Yes, my taxes are supporting over paid public sector staff. Us private sector pay for all this.
....
And you can't think (despite all the above) of anyone who doesn't work directly for the Government who is benefitting from our taxes:thinking:

...You might what to look at HMRC tax bands, and see that the more you earn, they more tax you pay both relatively and absolutely. The rich pay in, the poor take out. Simple maths.
I spend a great deal of time thinking, and none of what I said is astrophysics or rocket science.
Again, there's more to a tax burden than Income tax.

Your thoughts aren't astrophysics or rocket science, they're massive oversimplifications, as you can see above, there's lots of very important factors that don't occur to you. You will willingly ignore facts that don't conform to your opinions.

I'm afraid that does fall short of 'thinking'.
 
Why? Because someone is a Cristian doesn't mean you have to blindly follow every piece of docterine that comes from on high,

Really?
Why call yourself Christian if you deny its very substance ... why not call yourself something else?
On what do you base your 'Christianity' if not on the bible?
 
Really?
Why call yourself Christian if you deny its very substance ... why not call yourself something else?
On what do you base your 'Christianity' if not on the bible?
I'd say in exactly the same way that you do :), you distance your beliefs from the Old testament, which you describe as 'pre christian' IIRC.

BTW I'm not being argumentative, I'm pointing out that there are many variants of 'Christian belief' and they all think they have it about right, yours is as valid as Hugh's... and Steve's :confused:
 
Why? Because someone is a Cristian doesn't mean you have to blindly follow every piece of docterine that comes from on high, or blindly follow a book which is for a very large part made up or lost through centuries of translation.

Taking a thinking, adaptive approach rather then an everything literal one is, I think, the only way any religion has a place in modern life. And it still has a place, albeit one that needs to evolve.

It always confuses people I have a science based PhD and am a Christian. I don't think I'm a religous nutter. I hope when I had the pleasure of meeting you didn't leave thinking that of me. As I have friends I assume I'm not.

I don't believe in Virgin births, and I think the churches preChing on condoms in Africa is outrageous.

Equally though I think that an anti church argument that quotes the Old Testament as its source is probably fairly weak

I thought no such thing. ..meeting you was indeed a pleasure.

Your choice of words interests me though; that you dont follow every piece of doctrine that comes from "on high". As a believer in that power on high, why would you not?

You are correct though. I am astounded that someone with such a scientific background can find anything, anything at all, of merit in religion.

I mean absolutely no disrespect, but is it perhaps a fear of death? Not being able to accept that when we die, that's it...it's over?

I had a twelve year Catholic education, yet had dismissed all religious teachings by age eight, and despite some horrible things happening in my life I have never felt the need for that kind of crutch.

I do stand by my earlier post.
Religion, on the whole, is in decline, and in my opinion that that can only ever be a good thing.
 
Back
Top