Canon ef 400mm f5.6

Fast focus, sharp, light, good lens.
 
The ef 400mm f/5.6 is a fantastic lens, its light to carry, great for birds in flight shots, but it does need good light to keep your shutter speed up when hand held, I love mine :)
 
Have just ordered one of these lenses, based on feedback from users, and reviewers.

Plus having other L series lenses, I know the IQ will be excellent.

The plans is to add a Series lll 1.4x TC, to give 560mm at f/8 when required.

Dave
 
Last edited:
I have a 5D MK II so I know I want a good quality lens. The longest I have st the moment is a 70-200 F4 L. So just wanted something a little longer and can't afford both the 300 F4L and this so was thinking this to start with
 
... can't afford both the 300 F4L and this so was thinking this to start with
The 300mm f/4 L works very well with a 1.4x Extender gives you 420mm f/5.6. Image sharpness and focusing speed aren't quite up there with the 400mm f/5.6 L, but they are both more than adequate - and the IS can come in handy on dull days.
 
I have found a good copy of 100-400mm gives comparable (nearly as good) results with a bit more flexibility.
 
[quote"corny, post: 6220303, member: 7261"]I have found a good copy of 100-400mm............[/quote]

That would imply that many 100-400 lenses are not good?
 
Thanks for all your feedback. I know no lens is perfect in all ways. Was just looking for something to do more nature shots. Even though I know you can use a 1.4 or even a x2 extender I'd prefer not to if I can help it.
 
It really is a super len's sharp with super quick AF Too.

Rob.
 
Thanks for all your feedback. I know no lens is perfect in all ways. Was just looking for something to do more nature shots. Even though I know you can use a 1.4 or even a x2 extender I'd prefer not to if I can help it.
You could use a 1.4 extender to give you f8 which assuming you have a pro body will AF centre spot only, but a 2x converter will mean no AF even with a pro body. I consider a 5d3 a pro body in respect to AF at least.
Good lens, although a 70/200 f4 with a 2x converter isn't massively worse. So a 300 f4 plus a 2x plus your existing zoom would give you lots of options.
Matt
 
It is a superb lens - relatively small, light and inexpensive yet delivers images that are on a par with much bigger, more expensive lenses. I had one for a while but sold it to fund some studio equipment that I needed. I always regretted letting it go so was pleased when I was able to get another one last year.
 
Back
Top