audiovista
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 2
- Name
- Warren
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Thanks guy's,
Cheers woof woof, seems I have v1.1.1
Cheers woof woof, seems I have v1.1.1
I've heard it'll do this if your battery is low. Maybe give it a charge and try again?
It should work with 2 batteries in the grip, mine does. The fact that it doesn't like the single battery suggests battery condition is poor. One battery is clearly not working so it follows the other may be dodgy.
You can't tell. Only a Canon service team can, which is obviously quite annoying.I'm thinking of selling my 5D depending on how much I'll get for it. I'm not sure how many actuations are on it. The last shot I took shows as 100-6439, what does this mean ? Does it mean there have been 6439 actuations ? Can this number be reset ? When I bought the camera the seller said he wasn't sure how many actuations there were, he thought around 10k.
I bought 2 Sigma 50mm 1.4 in Canon for my ex 5D, in my own experience and a lot of internet users experience its really hard to find a copy that focuses accurately in Canon mount, good idea to look used or buy UK stock for easy returns. 5D has no micro adjust so makes it even more of a pain.
If you decide to get a new battery door, this one is currently the cheapest I've found.![]()
Indeed, Ive had BF FF with 2x 50 1.4, 3-4 70-200 2.8 in most mounts. I couldve just been unlucky time after time..... after time..... after time. I think Woof woof is the only person on TP whos been extremely lucky with Sigma.
Ive now got a tried and tested Sigma 50 1.4 on my D700 and its fantastic but Ill never buy another Sigma without knowing its spot on, way to much hassle with returns etc. My last 70-200 took 8 weeks!! to recalibrate. Sigma lenses are great (esp the primes) but imho they need to sort out their QC. Ive never had an issue with any main manufacturer lens before, and Ive had a few of those from each.
Still want the sigma 85 1.4 though![]()
Indeed, Ive had BF FF with 2x 50 1.4, 3-4 70-200 2.8 in most mounts. I couldve just been unlucky time after time..... after time..... after time. I think Woof woof is the only person on TP whos been extremely lucky with Sigma.
and surprisingly consistantly failed to hit focus although I could and did hit the same subject every time
Trying to tell someone their technique is crap is a waste of time and energy.blog said:The Canon 5D is an easy camera to fall in love with before you’ve ever handled one. It’s full frame, it’s produced iconic and beautiful images, it’s known as the 5D ‘classic’ as if it were a limited run Jaguar endorsed personally by 007, and it’s capabilities make it an easy 7/10 on the ‘justifiable-to-the-other-half’ scale of hobbiest photographer purchases.
I'm looking at a 5Dc at present with a serial number starting 053.
I think this makes it a 2005 model year.
Anything to look out for on these, or should I keep my powder dry for a later model?
You should make sure the mirror has been modified/fixed, if it has and provided the shutter count isn't too high it will be fine.
I ended up picking up a second hand Sigma 50mm f1.4 for a rather good price from Aperture in Holborn. No issues with the lens and really enjoying it with my 5D. Now I am yearning for something a bit wider, I am thinking the 17 - 40 L is pretty good bang for buck, any other suggestions?
dao said:I ended up picking up a second hand Sigma 50mm f1.4 for a rather good price from Aperture in Holborn. No issues with the lens and really enjoying it with my 5D. Now I am yearning for something a bit wider, I am thinking the 17 - 40 L is pretty good bang for buck, any other suggestions?
How about the 16-35 f/2.8? S'posed to be an awesome lens![]()