BBC defend clarkson

Status
Not open for further replies.
did you notie how they are all white - clear racisim at the BBC

Although if they'd included a black character they have been guiilty of tokenism and/or stereotyping .

With the PC brigade you just can't win (unless you by a Mac ;) )
 
Well of course they couldn't make that today. Current (new) BBC guidelines are that 1 in seven must be different race/ethnicity. Oh and there must be no all male panels on comedy quiz shows.
 
Oh and there must be no all male panels on comedy quiz shows.
Absolutely agree, what else are we males going to ogle? Look at?
The shows are generally crap anyway!
(Ooops sexist alert!)
 
Spoken like a true Brit! :p Have you decided your now Scottish?
Actually its quite funny, I stayed in a B&B North of Aberdeen for a couple of weeks working.

Obviously the place was run by a Scots couple.
(And very nice they were too :) )
The guy used to cook breakfast's to "order"
And would be supping a large mug of tea while cooking.

He would take a good mouthful and swallow.
Closely followed by the words Ach Aye!
I kid you not :)
 
Actually its quite funny, I stayed in a B&B North of Aberdeen for a couple of weeks working.

Obviously the place was run by a Scots couple.
(And very nice they were too :) )
The guy used to cook breakfast's to "order"
And would be supping a large mug of tea while cooking.

He would take a good mouthful and swallow.
Closely followed by the words Ach Aye!
I kid you not :)
A true Scot!
It's och aye, by the way ;)
 
A true Scot!
It's och aye, by the way ;)
That's what I thought too :)

Thanks for the correction BTW, I'm not terribly fluent in "Scottish" ( or should that be Celtish) :)
 
Absolutely agree, what else are we males going to ogle? Look at?
The shows are generally crap anyway!
(Ooops sexist alert!)

Well you can ogle Jo Brand if you wish. I'll pass.
 
Now Victoria Coren-Mitchell is a different thing altogether. Attractive, witty, plays poker and likes a drop of whisky. If that's un-PC, and you're offended on Jo Brand's behalf, then hard luck. I make no apologies.
 
I'm not sure how one assesses that with puppets.
That Pinocchio was a lying Bast. that's for sure!

Never did trust that Zippy either if I'm honest!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ST4
That Pinocchio was a lying Bast. that's for sure!

Never did trust that Zippy either if I'm honest!

I'm glad you didn't say you like Muffin the Mule.:sneaky:
 
I'm glad you didn't say you like Muffin the Mule.:sneaky:
I thought about it, but knew that someone would post it :p
It was an ea/way bet between you and Steve TBH :D
 
I thought about it, but knew that someone would post it :p
It was an ea/way bet between you and Steve TBH :D

I'm not sure I'm flattered by the comparison. :stop:
 
That Pinocchio was a lying Bast. that's for sure!

Never did trust that Zippy either if I'm honest!

Zippy was OK.....Now George....:eek::eek::eek:

It's always the quiet ones.
 
Zippy was OK.....Now George....:eek::eek::eek:

It's always the quiet ones.
No George is OK he "plays" stuttering idiot,
He reminds me of the scarlet pimpernel with his un assuming manner ;)

I'm sure he's busy rescuing toys from the "un wanted cupboard" somewhere, from the bowels of ITV :)
 
No George is OK he "plays" stuttering idiot,
He reminds me of the scarlet pimpernel with his un assuming manner ;)

I'm sure he's busy rescuing toys from the "un wanted cupboard" somewhere, from the bowels of ITV :)

OK well what about Bungle?
Come on...there's something deeply disturbing about a six foot bear who walks about naked (well, save for fur), but wears trunks to go into the sea and demands a towel when he loses (yeah, right) those trunks whilst swimming........ :lol:
 
Dunno I think Geoffrey is the one to worry about, a grown man still playing with his toys :D
 
OK well what about Bungle?
Come on...there's something deeply disturbing about a six foot bear who walks about naked (well, save for fur), but wears trunks to go into the sea and demands a towel when he loses (yeah, right) those trunks whilst swimming........ :LOL:
Ah yes, now bungle, he is slightly worrying.

Lets kill two birds with one stone........
Rainbow does Top Gear
Most certainly NSFW!
Lots of swearing


 
1 minute 30.......Steve?!?!?!
(sorry....couldn't resist)

Chris, that video is so wrong :lol: :lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: ST4
clarkson was clearly using a "stereotype" as a joke, and we all use stereo types and have a laugh at the expense of the stereo type.

for instance.....

......

no i'm not speaking for anyone, i am speaking my views,


No.. you said WE ALL do this... which is speaking for everyone. If you do it, then fine.. that's up to you.
 
ok, i dont really get that,

can anyone honestly say they don't use stereo types? was what i should have written


And if you had, that would be a different matter.

We all use stereotypes all the time, yes, but that doesn't mean we use them to discriminate in the same way. I use behavioural stereotypes often. These are assumptions based on what people perhaps do for a hobby, or wear, or drive. I agree.. we all stereotype. However, RACIAL stereotypes, or stereotypes based on gender, sexuality, disability.... are something else, because you're making assumptions someone will behave in a certain way, or do certain things based on their race, gender, sexuality or disability and nothing more. If I want to make a joke about someone who plays golf... so what... it applies equally to anyone who plays golf and discriminates against no one... except golfers.. but you know what? That's just a game... and it's a game they chose to play... and a game they could just as easily choose not to play. If I made a joke about Indian golfers however... that's not the same... it's no longer about golf.... it's now about Indians.

So yes.. we all laugh at the expense of stereotypes Ricky... and I apologise for the misunderstanding there... but you're still talking on everyone's behalf if you extend this to include laughing at racial stereotypes, as I can assure you not everyone finds humour in mocking people just because of what they are.

I laugh at people all the time... particularly in here... but it's because of what they do, not what they are. I've no idea if who I'm laughing at is black, Asian, white, fat, gay, ugly or anything else though have I. What someone does is a choice, even if they don't realise they have a choice yet... it's still a choice. If I laugh at someone's terrible fashion sense, they have a choice: They can ignore me... or they can buy some new clothes. If I laugh at someone for being fat... then for all I know... that could well be the final comment, after a life time of bullying, that pushes them over the edge into self-harm or worse. So no.... some things for me are just off the menu for humour and stereotyping, and race is one of them - as there's nothing the victim can do about it.

An interesting point however, is that some people NEED to stereotype, even though I think it's abhorrent that need should exist. I know for a fact that the Police often need to stereotype, and I'm NOT just saying that the police stop more black people than white, although in certain areas of the country, inevitably, that will be the case. Here in Blackpool... we don't really have any racially segregated communities like in other north west towns, such as Blackburn, or Bradford, but here in Blackpool, which has massively deprived areas in the centre of town, wearing "trackies" or in any way looking like a "chav" will get you stopped by the police more often, as you'd be fitting a profile, which through experience, would be informing the officer in question that you're more likely to be up to no good... especially after dark. Now then.... no one in Blackpool is accusing the police of being racist. They are using a stereotype to make value judgements on the chances of someone being up to no good and stopping them to find out (something they're perfectly entitled to do). However.. because Blackpool doesn't really have a black population of any noticeable size, the vast majority who are stopped are white.... so fine... no police racism here in Blackpool then... cool. However... if that same officer transferred to... let's say Moss Side or Brixton.. or somewhere else where the black population is predominant, or at least very large, and let's also assume he carries on working in exactly the same way. How long do you think it would be before that officer gets accused of being racist? :)


It's an interesting debate, and I'm sure there ARE racist police officers... in fact.. we KNOW there are... but even the majority who aren't will still get accused of such, simply because they stereotype. I think you'll find they stereotype based on behaviour if they're doing their job right though.

Sorry to go off on one Ricky, but in answer to your question.... yes.. we all stereotype.... but no, we don't all stereotype based on race, body size, disability or anything else that has no bearing on someone's behaviour. So yes... when Clarkson makes a joke about motorcyclists being closet fetishists who like dressing as power rangers... that's perfectly fine... it's a choice they've made, and it applies equally to all races. Make a joke about Mexicans, and that relies on the fact that ALL Mexicans are feckless and lazy. If I was Mexican, I'd probably be offended by that. The JOKE itself is no worse than making a joke about people who wear skinny jeans and ride single speed bikes... but if I did.. I've CHOSEN to do that, and perhaps would even enjoy the joke myself.... after all... just a joke about Hipsters right? If I was Mexican... that's not a choice... that's what I am... you're laughing AT me for simply being what I AM.

If you can't understand why that is hurtful.... then you're ignorant.
 
I've read back through this thread and it's a bit awkward, isn't it?

So let me get the line in immediately and be the first to say "I'm not a racist, but ..." Because we haven't had that cliche yet!

In large part I tend to agree with Pookey's concerns but rather than being simply bad and wrong, I would suggest that racism is corrosive for the giver as well as for the receiver.

Then I saw norters' posts that racism is always morally wrong, simple as that! And that might be true for him but I don't accept it is quite so [no pun] black and white. As with so many things, cries of racism are rather more nuanced. As lots of people have said and given lots of examples, context and intent and circumstance are everything. And I have almost equal scorn for the corrosive behaviour that I think is a concomitant of norters' belief system.

I have huge scorn for political correctness and faux outrage and groupthink and for the newish phenomenon of accusations of what amounts to "thought crime" and of society defining and vilifying acceptible and unacceptible opinions. That ghettoisation of ideas, however wrong those ideas might be, and that shutting down of debate does nothing to help decency or equality [in the broadest not the political sense] either. It's merely the pendulum of beliefs swinging too far the other way.

Pookey spoke interestingly of moving up North and when I met Yv, I too was surprised that the suburb of Stockport where she lived was whiter than I can remember London having been in my lifetime, even in the early 1960s. It's no surprise if people with no history of multicultural interaction get it wong sometimes. That's where engagement and, necessarily slow education come in, rather than demanding immediate "re-education".

I realise I am quite confident in my background and family history and upbringing and family friends and own circle of friends and acquaintances and perhaps because of that confidence, I never seem to have any trouble asking direct cultural questions or citing differences that seem to be received with the same openness they're asked. And that can include chucking in "knowing litlle" stereotyped jokes. Perhaps because of that I'm not too concerned about gentle sterotyping like a Mexican car or chucking in an odd pun about 'slopes' that isn't in general perjorative use. I could argue they help open the interraction without in either of those cases actually doing too much harm.

After all, we all have our sterotypes and pre-conceptions and prejudices. One day in the 1960s I was playing in the front garden with two friends when a lady knocked on the door and earnestly told my mother "I'm SO pleased! I'm collecting for South East Asian refugees and I see you've already adopted two!". My mum burst out laughing. My two playmates were Asian guys but they weren't exactly refugees as per her prejudices of Asians!

They lived two doors away; their father was First Secretary at the Indonesian Embassy and the boys had a Norland Nanny and their own chauffeur!
 
.

After all, we all have our sterotypes and pre-conceptions and prejudices. One day in the 1960s I was playing in the front garden with two friends when a lady knocked on the door and earnestly told my mother "I'm SO pleased! I'm collecting for South East Asian refugees and I see you've already adopted two!". My mum burst out laughing. My two playmates were Asian guys but they weren't exactly refugees as per her prejudices of Asians!

That could be the opening gambit in a discourse that changes that woman's mind about anyone of south east asian descent...yes... or it could just be shrugged off as these kids being an exception to a firmly held belief that continues regardless. I see your point... but wouldn't the ideal situation be to strive for a society that didn't jump to any conclusions based on whether you had slitty eyes and dark skin though? After all.. that, and that alone was the basis for her assumption.

The only way to achieve that, is by not exposing children to the racial stereotypes in the first place. It's ignorance that created the stereotypes ion the first place, and it's ignorance that continues to teach them to our children.
 
Last edited:
Here's your answer. An article from today's Telegraph I found while watching the Test Match.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/comedy/11021641/A-funny-thing-has-happened-to-comedy.html

It answers you better than I could. First, funny is funny. Secondly, as ethology at undergraduate level taught me, a sense of "us and them" and the other, is fundamental to all animal life - although I agree at human social level it must be very nuanced how you deal with the outgroup - and thirdly "ism-ism" is itself every bit as bigotted as any "ism"!

I even like the second part of the article deploring India's disgraceful abuse of the game of cricket and, especially for @Steep 's benefit, the third part deriding Mr Salmond!
 
Here's your answer. An article from today's Telegraph I found while watching the Test Match.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/comedy/11021641/A-funny-thing-has-happened-to-comedy.html

It answers you better than I could. First, funny is funny. Secondly, as ethology at undergraduate level taught me, a sense of "us and them" and the other, is fundamental to all animal life - although I agree at human social level it must be very nuanced how you deal with the outgroup - and thirdly "ism-ism" is itself every bit as bigotted as any "ism"!

I even like the second part of the article deploring India's disgraceful abuse of the game of cricket and, especially for @Steep 's benefit, the third part deriding Mr Salmond!


Interesting read. However... no arguments were offered to suggest why people like Bernard Manning were not harmful or promoted racism... just one column writer's opinion as to why he prefers that stuff to right on, lefty alternative comedy (which in itself can be just as bad in the opposite direction).

Never once have I said that comedy can't tackle issues or race, gender or anything else. Calling Mexicans names is not really clever, well observed comedy that uses race in any way other than to exploit people's inherent racism though. Yes.. Manning was a great stand up... I agree... but his material just relied on working class prejudices and xenophobia to work. I remember watching Manning once... [Spots asian in audience] "Are you a Jap?.... Wonderful.. enjoying it here?... [walks across stage]... "You look like a nice English lad.... go and p*** on that Jap".

Yes.. hilarious, and harmless.

I have laughed at some of Manning's material though... but examples like that are just not funny.
 
Last edited:
I even like the second part of the article deploring India's disgraceful abuse of the game of cricket and, especially for @Steep 's benefit, the third part deriding Mr Salmond!

Cheers Jonathan I have no clue who Micheal Henderson is but if I did I think I may just have had my views of him confirmed :)
 
Pookeyhead

But thats assumption that for example if Clarkson, or anyone else makes a joke about Mexicans, then all Mexicans must be insulted. That isn't necessarily so, in fact I'd go so far as to say very few feel insulted. In the same way as we used to tell jokes about the Irish. Did the entire Irish race go off on one? No. But even if they did feel insulted, is it really that much of an issue? Using a stereotype, the Irish have a sense of humour, and in general laugh it off.
The perception amongst the PC Brigade is that they must be insulted, and that it is motivated by hate, dislike or some other form of malice, which of course it usually isn't. And it is that attitude which is far more patronising than any comment made by the likes of Clarkson.
Of course the PC Industry won't accept that, simply because they are a 'growth industry', and if reality were ever allowed to creep in they'd be out of a job.
And then there's the professional 'take offencers' who realise thats there's money for old rope to be made.

In reality, very few who might be expected to took offence at what Clarkson said, and even if they did, then they can speak for themselves. Those that complain about offence are rarely those who are could be offended and taking are it upon themselves to be insulted. For example the lunatic university professor who recently claimed a Radio 4 Gardening program was racist because they talked about foreign plants! Or the Government who declined a job center advert because it asked for people who were fluent in English.

The only time race should come into play is when someone is genuinely treated in a disadvantaged way because of their race. I say genuinely because all to often racism is shouted when it really isn't. Again, thats a by product of the PC industry and not a by product of humour.
 
Pookeyhead

But thats assumption that for example if Clarkson, or anyone else makes a joke about Mexicans, then all Mexicans must be insulted. That isn't necessarily so, in fact I'd go so far as to say very few feel insulted.

And you know this because?

In the same way as we used to tell jokes about the Irish. Did the entire Irish race go off on one?

No.. and I'm not suggesting the whole of Mexico has gone off on one either, but I bet the Irish would rather not have us perpetuate the stereotype that they're all thick.... Besides... I dare you to go into a Belfast pub and start telling Irish jokes. If it's as harmless as you say.. there'll be no issues... surely?

No. But even if they did feel insulted, is it really that much of an issue? Using a stereotype, the Irish have a sense of humour, and in general laugh it off.

You mean like us British did when when the Daily express ran an article on "British Jokes" from around the world a few years ago? :) Ooohhh... the collective p1ssed-offness was palpable. Apparently Australians have jokes about us saying that we're all whining, crying babies who never wash and smell badly. It didn't go down well at all Bernie. The world didn't end, no.. but racist jokes based on negative stereotypes are A) Just not really funny... I mean, it's hardly sophisticated humour is it.. and B) The long term result is we're constantly raising generations with very real prejudices based on race. It's just too easy to dismiss it as harmless.


The perception amongst the PC Brigade is that they must be insulted, and that it is motivated by hate, dislike or some other form of malice, which of course it usually isn't.

I have two issues with that statement. 1. You seem to think you can speak for everyone who has racially motivated jokes made about them, and 2. That I think the jokes are made out of malice and hate. I don;t think that at all. I genuinely think that the purveyors of such jokes feel it's genuinely harmless... like you do. Oh.. and 3. I'm not part of any PC brigade. I just feel that making jokes that suggest Mexicans are lazy and feckless is just insulting, and really, really sh1t comedy. I mean.. getting a laugh by insulting someone else. That's what school yard bullies do. Since when has that been clever or admirable?


Of course the PC Industry won't accept that, simply because they are a 'growth industry', and if reality were ever allowed to creep in they'd be out of a job.

Political correctness is not an industry... :thinking:

In reality, very few who might be expected to took offence at what Clarkson said,

How the hell do you know? LOL Polled the opinions of many Mexicans have you?


and even if they did, then they can speak for themselves.

Well.. the Mexican ambassador did... very firmly.


Those that complain about offence are rarely those who are could be offended and taking are it upon themselves to be insulted.

Again.. you know this how exactly?

For example the lunatic university professor who recently claimed a Radio 4 Gardening program was racist because they talked about foreign plants! Or the Government who declined a job center advert because it asked for people who were fluent in English.

You can't really compare some nut job on Gardner's Question Time talking about plants with insulting Mexicans in front of an audience of 350 million people! This has got nothing to do with political correctness. Besides.. sounds like the nut job was racist himself if he doesn't those damned foreign plants over here... LOL

The only time race should come into play is when someone is genuinely treated in a disadvantaged way

You're disadvantaging people every time you perpetuate negative racial stereotypes of them. If you can't see that, you're ignorant of the facts.


I say genuinely because all to often racism is shouted when it really isn't.

In what way is calling Mexicans lazy, feckless and flatulent not racist? Sorry.. maybe I'm being stupid... but how is that not racist?


The fact is, crap comedians fall back on racial, gender and sexual stereotypes because it's the lowest common denominator and appeals the broadest, easiest to please audience. It's lazy comedy. If making fun of other people just because of who they are is so essential to comedy, how come Bill Bailey, or Eddie Izzard have no problem getting through an entire 2 hours set without doing it once, and still be more clever, witty and entertaining than someone like Bernard Manning?

If you think reducing people to insulting stereotypes is funny... then I just feel sorry for you.

"Harmless" racial stereotypes cause harm. I once remember my Mum telling me that all Indians smell of curry because they eat so much if it, and that they're dirty because they don't use toilet paper. I believed that when I was a kid. Why wouldn't I? My Mum told me. Fortunately I've grown up, got an education and travelled the world and since realised that ultimately, we're all the same, but someone uneducated, perhaps living in Burnley.. never really travelled or integrated much... well.. Why do you think these places are hot spots of deeply disturbing racism? How come affluent areas of London that have larger areas of certain cultures don't suffer the same fate? The answer is obvious... less ignorance in some places that others, clearly. That distrust and dislike starts somewhere. It doesn't just happen.. something germinates that way of thinking, and like most behavioural issues, childhood is where you should be looking.

Incidentally, many Indians don't use toilet paper, and do actually wipe themselves with their hands.... actually they WASH themselves with their hands.. and they think WE'RE dirty because all we do is smear it around with a piece of paper and pull our pants up, leaving smelly skid marks in our undies. The thing is... they're absolutely right... our asses smell.. there's probably don't. LOL That's neither here nor there though... I just found the irony of this funny when finding this out brought my Mum's comments back. :)


Any way.. we'll just have to disagree. I feel I've put a good case forward, but you either get this, or you don't. Clearly you've never experienced racism in your own life... either directed at you, or the ones you love. If you had, or do, you'd not have this glib attitude to casual racism. Serious racism has it's roots in this casual "harmless" racism. Racism is racism.. there are no harmless kinds, and the casual acceptance of it in this forum is saddening to see. Just can't say all Mexicans are lazy, any more than you can say all Black men are criminals and gangsters, or that all Irish are thick, or all Arabs are Muslim radicals.... you just can;t... and if you think it's a great idea doing it to a WORLDWIDE audience... you truly are ignorant.
 
David

I know that on the incline comment there were 150 complaints, none of those made by the 2 Vietnamese that I know, who thought it was hilarious. But on the other hand you don't know who was 'insulted'. I'll put money on very few if any being from Vietnam, and the majority being White Anglo Saxon Protestants with an axe to grind against Clarkson.

The Mexican ambassador is here to promote Mexico, I'd be surprised if he didn't say anything, but he no more speaks for the population of Mexico than you do.

I've not tried telling Irish Jokes in a Belfast pub, but I have in a Dublin one. I am still here to tell the tale, the locals were doing the same.

I'll disagree with you very strongly on the PC Industry, it now supports a huge industry. From 'race and diversity' advisors to pointless courses run on the subject. It's self serving and the cause on it's own of problems, forcing someone to do something is never effective, and you cause people to react against it. Besides those of us who are an ethnic mix do find them exceptionally patronising.

Which leads us to British jokes. fine, in exactly the same way as Irish jokes don't both the Irish part of me, nor comments or what the PC Brigade consider insulting words about my Cypriot side don't worry me why the hell should A 'British' joke? It's words, and those words can't cause me harm. What I do find insulting and patronising is the idea that I must be insulted. I'm afraid it's you that can't see the reality.

Just as I find it patronising for you to assume that I don't know about Indian toilet habits, or bothered to read what I said previously.

You call it racism, I don't. You are clearly bothered by it, even though it really doesn't effect you in any way. I am not, even though, by yours and the PC Industry's book I 'must be'. But in you doing that, you and the PC Industry are being racist. You are assuming I must be something due to a racial origin, which I find ironic.
 
As I said.. we'll have to agree to disagree.

For any further replies.... see post #146 otherwise I'll just be repeating myself, and that post seems to sum up stuff I've written ion other posts... so that should save some time.



I do find it amusing that all these people seem to be suggesting how thick skinned, resilient and difficult to offend people generally are, and that we shouldn't worry... yet it doesn't seem to take much for some of the same people to go crying to moderators in here when they get upset over something I said about their photographs :)

If it's convenient for you to carry on assuming casual, "joking" racism is harmless, then you'll probably find a way to justify it... usually by calling anyone who objects a loony lefty, or accusing them of political correctness. The irony is that when it comes to criticising someone's photography, this forum is the most politically correct place in the universe!


You are clearly bothered by it, even though it really doesn't effect you in any way.


That's just proof that you've not actually read anything else I've written in this thread then isn't it. Incidentally.. I wonder if it affects you or not. Redundant question actually... clearly not, or you'd not have the stand point you have.

Little point writing any more really... Some people just want to defend their right to be casually racist no matter what, and label anyone who questions that right as a politically correct lefty as a means of dismissing them. (shrug).

But in you doing that, you and the PC Industry are being racist. You are assuming I must be something due to a racial origin, which I find ironic.

I'm not assuming so because of a racial origin. I have no idea what your racial origins are Bernie: Unlike you.... I don't give a sh*t. I'm assuming so based upon your BEHAVIOUR. At no point, anywhere in this thread, have I assumed people are racist BECAUSE THEY ARE WHITE. In fact, if you took the effort to read what I've written, I've made it quite plain and clear that I feel racism is truly universal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top