If that's the "Shortlist" I'd hate to see the ones that didn't make the grade!
Football "action" shots without a ball in the frame - pointless and frankly unacceptable!
:thumbsdown:
Errrr sorry but thats *******s. All of the action shots there have the ball in the frame, also you don't know if that website have messed up the cropping of shots like the Ginola one (which will have been shot on film, with a manual focus lens....good luck getting anything that good without years and years of practice, the photographer who took that is one of the best around)
Have you ever shot a game of football before? good luck getting anything close to the quality of the shots shown here, i think your being very disrespectful to some extremely professional, highly skilled photographers!
As for peoples comments about the shots not being "good" it took me a while to get my head round it but it isn't about how technically good the shot is or the composition, its about content.
The problem with the shortlist is they haven't given the story behind each shot and the significance of it, some like the Beckham shot are obvious. That goal launched his career. The Gerrard shot shows what he means to Liverpool fans, a home grown captain adored by the fans.......
Personally i like all of the shots on the shortlist.
Can't say im surprised at the lack of input here from the people who are full time sports photographers.
I'm amazed Tony is still bothering to give advise when most people ignore it or think they know better!