viv1969
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 29,452
- Name
- Bat-Frog
- Edit My Images
- No
We don't know the circumstances of this incident. Did the dog dash out from under the owner's chair and bite the child or did the child get too close to the dog and then it bit?
We don't know on which beach/part of the beach this happened. The Skegness.net site says -
“Dogs are banned from the busiest part of Skegness beach between 1 May and 30 September.”
The report in the Linclonshire Echo includes -
“Police are taking this opportunity to remind dog owners that dogs must be kept on a lead on the beach”
which suggests it happened in an area where dogs are allowed.
Although the report says the dog was not on a lead we only have one side of the story, though from the photo it doesn't appear to be on a lead.
However, I feel this is an example of an irresponsible dog owner. The photo shows a very busy beach which I think is not the ideal place for a dog. Sticking it under a chair is also not great. Yes, it keeps the dog out of the sun but it is going to get bored/frustrated – outside but not able to have a run about and a good sniff at everything.
It is sad that a child has been hurt and also that, should the owner be found, there is a risk that the dog will be put down when the fault appears to rest with at least one of the humans involved.
Dave
Which is all well and good, but the photo also clearly places the woman and her dog on the main part of the beach, close to both the funfair and what little remains of the pier, which is, as the article says, close to Grand Parade.
I'm a dog lover, but lead or no lead, the dog should not have been on the beach at all.
. in the case of this one i feel the TP jury has run out of steam ,perhaps we should look it up on FB to see if the vicious dog has been caught and killed by the gooders yet .
