Apple Q1 results, what recession?

We'll see. Just like Apples share price and image will take time to drop to where they should be from their exalted heights, so it will take time to get the Google Play market sorted.

But it will get there.

That remains to be seen.

The thing is if they did pull it off and just solved the problems on android stores they could easily be hugely successful. That's an if though as they haven't seemed to do anything about the issues.

I think apple will still rule this world though. The same people who said the iPad would fail are the same ones who are claiming failure now. They were proved wrong then and I think they'll be proved wrong again.
 
I was hoping he was being ironic..........
Nope...

I'm not a developer either, I just don't understand the reference to viruses. I made a comment about being able to read to use iTunes (or a computer). I don't get the link between reading/iTunes and viruses.

Maybe it's just me :shrug:
Just clicking OK gives you viruses.

Just clicking OK wipes your iPod.

People are stupid....

Clearer now?
 
I think apple will still rule this world though. The same people who said the iPad would fail are the same ones who are claiming failure now. They were proved wrong then and I think they'll be proved wrong again.
I wouldn't call the iPad a failure (!). But I don't think Apple will be as dominant as they are even now in a few years.

It will depend on their product lineup - for which they are wholly responsible (unlike most other players).
 
I was hoping he was being ironic..........

I'm beginning to suspect a little "stirring" here, or your comment about stupidity being self-referencing.

Still can't see why you bring up viruses when I post that to use a computer requires the ability to read, and the ability to read means you can read warnings in iTunes if you try and sync with the wrong iTunes library?

There's another tangent over there -> go off on that one as well.

I still would like to know what do viruses have to do with the ability to read or the use of iTunes? In small words, please.
 
Nope...


Just clicking OK gives you viruses.

Just clicking OK wipes your iPod.

People are stupid....

Clearer now?

No, not at all.

Just clicking OK does many things, it even switches off your computer.

You were the one who stated that merely plugging into iTunes wipes the content, are you saying you are stupid?
 
I still would like to know what do viruses have to do with the ability to read or the use of iTunes? In small words, please.
A lot of people get viruses because they don't read and just click. I also know quite a few people who have wiped their iPod because they have not read and clicked. The same action is required for both to happen. That is why they are related.

You got my sarcasm though ;)
 
Ah, finally worked out what the hell you are on about after going back to your previous posts, and it appears to be your inability to read properly that is too blame.

Why reference and quote my reply when it has now become obvious you were answering PJ S who made a reference to viruses? A bit silly there, perhaps you should pay more attention to who you are replying to.

Nothing any different there from the idiot users who click OK, OK, OK, then wonder how in hell's name they've managed to install a virus on their computer.
 
You were the one who stated that merely plugging into iTunes wipes the content, are you saying you are stupid?
Yes, it has happened to me (with my daughters iPod - I was loading my two daughters iPods from my one computer account which iTunes never used to like - I have no idea if it does now or not). I was flabbergasted that anyone would design a system like that.

I know SEVERAL people it has also happened to (mostly computer geeks too).
 
Yes, it has happened to me (with my daughters iPod - I was loading my two daughters iPods from my one computer account which iTunes never used to like - I have no idea if it does now or not). I was flabbergasted that anyone would design a system like that.

I know SEVERAL people it has also happened to (mostly computer geeks too).

So, the conclusion there? You know SEVERAL stupid people? ;)
 
Ah, finally worked out what the hell you are on about after going back to your previous posts, and it appears to be your inability to read properly that is too blame.

Why reference and quote my reply when it has now become obvious you were answering PJ S who made a reference to viruses? A bit silly there, perhaps you should pay more attention to who you are replying to.
Nope. I quoted the right text from you....
 
Nope. I quoted the right text from you....

I give up :bang:, PJ S made the virus comment, (including the "just click OK" point), I made no reference to viruses.

If you are replying to the virus comment the general logic is to quote the poster who made the comment you are replying to, not just chose a random poster who is then left mystified because they have no idea what the comment relates to :cuckoo:.

But no problem, in the same vein as managing to erase an iPod Touch twice, I'll leave you to carry on doing it your own way.


Yes. And?

Maybe that's why Android is so popular....

It's just easier for stupid people who would keep erasing their content if they used iOS?
 
Last edited:
I'm not a developer either, I just don't understand the reference to viruses.

A lot of people get malware infections by visiting a web site that promises something desirable (nude images of famous celeb, free copy of expensive software, full version of not-yet-released blockbuster movie) and click on the 'OK' button.

Of course a lot of people also get malware by downloading what looks like a legit version of something cool for their Android device, only to find that it's sending spam text messages to all of your friends. Resulting in your phone company charging you piles of cash and your friends deciding they're not that keen on you after all.
 
I give up :bang:, PJ S made the virus comment, (including the "just click OK" point), I made no reference to viruses.
You are correct. You didn't.

If you are replying to the virus comment the general logic is to quote the poster who made the comment you are replying to, not just chose a random poster who is then left mystified because they have no idea what the comment relates to :cuckoo:.
I was drawing a parallel. I.e. it is as easy to delete an iPod as it is to get a virus installed.

But no problem, in the same vein as managing to erase an iPod Touch twice, I'll leave you to carry on doing it your own way.
No. Only once. You have to be stupid to do it twice.
 
A lot of people get malware infections by visiting a web site that promises something desirable (nude images of famous celeb, free copy of expensive software, full version of not-yet-released blockbuster movie) and click on the 'OK' button.

Of course a lot of people also get malware by downloading what looks like a legit version of something cool for their Android device, only to find that it's sending spam text messages to all of your friends. Resulting in your phone company charging you piles of cash and your friends deciding they're not that keen on you after all.

I understand all that Frank, what caused the confusion was arad85 quoting the wrong person (me) with a post about viruses when he probably should have quoted the PJ S who did reply to him about viruses.

Multiple posts later and it still hadn't dawned on him that he was spouting away blindly without realising his original error.

The irony of the situation was the fact that I had commented on stupid people being unable to read properly when a warning pop-up happens in iTunes which causes the user to self erase their library.

All for arad85 to come along with his size 12s.......
 
Thank you.
For? It wasn't an apology. I never claimed you did say it. As I posted above, I was drawing a parallel with people installing viruses.

Apologies, I took your post to infer you did the same with the iPods of 2 daughters.
I don't own an iPod. I updated my first daughters iPod with some music (after begrudgingly installing iTunes - "what... I can't just copy and paste????"). I plugged my second daughters iPod in and just pressed OK. It got wiped.

So... One iPod wiped. The other updated with the music I put on for my daughter. Me with a disk full of cr@p music that the iPod had sync'd to my machine that I had to get rid of. Brain dead software. Totally brain dead.

iTunes got rid of that night and found an alternative should I ever need to put music on their iPods again. That was 5+ years ago and I have no idea if iTunes is the same today - no inclination to find out. The whole experience gave me an (ir)rational dislike of iTunes - I have NEVER come across software so locked in.
 
I don't think they are stupid, they are uneducated on what to click or not click - there is a massive difference.

I could call you stupid for using Canon but I won't.
 
arad85 said:
For? It wasn't an apology. I never claimed you did say it. As I posted above, I was drawing a parallel with people installing viruses.

I don't own an iPod. I updated my first daughters iPod with some music (after begrudgingly installing iTunes - "what... I can't just copy and paste????"). I plugged my second daughters iPod in and just pressed OK. It got wiped.

So... One iPod wiped. The other updated with the music I put on for my daughter. Me with a disk full of cr@p music that the iPod had sync'd to my machine that I had to get rid of. Brain dead software. Totally brain dead.

iTunes got rid of that night and found an alternative should I ever need to put music on their iPods again. That was 5+ years ago and I have no idea if iTunes is the same today - no inclination to find out. The whole experience gave me an (ir)rational dislike of iTunes - I have NEVER come across software so locked in.

You can't sync back to the computer from the iPod. You might have had the option enabled for iTunes to manage your media which will move everything to the location set in the preferences.

We're wandering waaaaaaaaaaaay off topic now though.
 
There have been several RTM's
about this thread and a couple or so
members that have posted in here.
This just a reminder to play nice guys ;)


fair warning time, we're sick of the amount of petty arguing, trolling, baiting and head-up-arsedness that is going on at the moment, so a short period of suspension will be given to those who we feel are disrupting the general flow of the forum, and permanent bans for any members that we feel have had enough chances.
 
Really? Wow. :shrug: (seriously....)

I would agree, seriously?

Especially as the "heated" discussion was mostly between Arad85 and me, I'd like to make the point at no stage did I feel anything was beyond a lively debate (and I certainly didn't RTM anything)..

Some people seem a little delicate :shrug:.
 
I would agree, seriously?

Especially as the "heated" discussion was mostly between Arad85 and me, I'd like to make the point at no stage did I feel anything was beyond a lively debate (and I certainly didn't RTM anything)..

Some people seem a little delicate :shrug:.

Top man Dave.
 
Really? Wow. :shrug: (seriously....)

I would agree, seriously?

Especially as the "heated" discussion was mostly between Arad85 and me, I'd like to make the point at no stage did I feel anything was beyond a lively debate (and I certainly didn't RTM anything)..

Some people seem a little delicate :shrug:.

Yes seriously, and its not all about you two.
No matter what you think.

It was a none specific no names mentioned, heads up.
 
it looks like some people are looking for the slightest disagreement and reporting them, the 2 guys in this thread had kissed and made up so its all fine, but please take a few minutes to consider how other people view your postings, there are some delicate, easy to offend souls out there
 
it looks like some people are looking for the slightest disagreement and reporting them, the 2 guys in this thread had kissed and made up so its all fine, but please take a few minutes to consider how other people view your postings, there are some delicate, easy to offend souls out there

I understand this post but surely you need to direct this at the delicate souls more so.
 
although somewhat at odds with

we are thankful for all reports, however trivial the matter may seem

one presumes that the person who reported this thread (it wasnt me btw) thought it was worth reporting. If what admin actually mean , is 'don't report any disagreement unless/until its degenerated into a total bitch fight' it might be an idea to say so
 
......there are some delicate, easy to offend souls out there

I must resist
I must resist
I must, I must
I must resist

Aww, bless 'em!
preach.gif


Phew! That took a lot of restraining. :p
 
although somewhat at odds with



one presumes that the person who reported this thread (it wasnt me btw) thought it was worth reporting. If what admin actually mean , is 'don't report any disagreement unless/until its degenerated into a total bitch fight' it might be an idea to say so

Gotta say, I had the same thought as you. In the past it seems that ANY thing not only could, but should be reported. Now some people relish in their reporting finger being so muscular. So, it all seems a little contradictory to me.
 
Very occasionally, I feel sorry for them Mod folk !
 
that the person who reported this thread (it wasnt me btw) thought it was worth reporting.
Actually that was plural(s) ;)
And yes they thought it was worth reporting.
We looked and issued a play nice.
And as people seem to be playing nice, alls well with the world :thumbs:


Very occasionally, I feel sorry for them Mod folk !
So do I :D
 
So, the conclusion there? You know SEVERAL stupid people? ;)

It happened to me as well. I don't think it has anything to do with stupidity, I think it had to do with ambiguous settings and the expectation that a program would have that kind of protection built in. Failing that, then yeah, maybe stupidity.
 
Back
Top