As far as people keep asking, it appears to need stated - but there's no complaint about that - it's simply an explanation of the reason to leave. Of course Westminter should favour 55 million English, or 30 million in the SE. Of course the EU should favour Germany. The only surprise within that I suppose is why the smaller countries don't anticipate and preempt the resulting problems. But no complaint whatsoever - it is as is to be expected, therefore address it and move forward.You can't keep complaining about not having a controlling vote when part of a union with a bigger country.
Excuse me? are you saying I'm somehow responsible for the outburst of a violent former teacher who's p***ed off at Gordon Brown?
You, as in a representative of the Yes campaign? Yes. Because you should be against such uncivil behaviour and not want such people representing the Yes campaign.
http://www.yesscotland.net/news/yes-scotland-publishes-details-campaign-donations-0
80% came from just one couple. So no, they aren't putting money where their mouth is.
And the people donating less than £7500 each?
That's 'over 11000' donors from a population of over 5,000,000. Not really a good example of 'the people putting their money where their moves are' really, is it. Less than 1/4 of a percent.
Not to mention the £2,500,000 from just one couple!
Fair do's for raising money to support a cause but don't overstate it as a good thing when the reality is slightly different.
I'm sure there are more than 11000 individual people putting money in buckets etc but just find using such info as a positive a little strange.
Good on you, I'm going postal as well, still waiting for the ballot paper though.
If you vote yes, the likes of him won't have anything to shout about. You're more likely to hear of these things if you vote no.And if we vote Yes will we get more of the likes of Mike Barile? A Yes supporter shouting abuse - a former teacher who was struck off for assaulting children.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/together-again-as-brown-and-darling-cosy-up-for-no-rally.25168077?utm_source=www.heraldscotland.com&utm_medium=RSS Feed&utm_campaign=Scottish News
What? A man shouting at Gordon Brown?Disturbing scenes in Kirkcaldy today apparently.
What? A man shouting at Gordon Brown?
Not a good thing, but hardly disturbing.
Nah, cracking an egg on Jim Murphy's back.
Well, don't hold your breath. Imagine how long it would take the Scottish passport service to work through the backlog.If it is a YES, I want a Scottish passport too![]()
Well, don't hold your breath. Imagine how long it would take the Scottish passport service to work through the backlog.
Disturbing scenes in Kirkcaldy today apparently.
Not too bad if you don't mind waiting until your UK passport expires, which could be up to 10 years away. But if the government of an independent Scotland wanted to be able to issue Scottish passports (to those who want them) reasonably quickly, the staffing would need to be ramped up way beyond the "steady state" situation. That wouldn't be easy at a time when there would be all sorts of other transitional activities taking place, though I imagine that the government would probably prioritise it to a certain extent for legitimate PR reasons.Ten times less the population, shouldn't be too bad?
My UK passport has expired, I'm holding off renewing it because I don't want to have to do it again in two years, I'll order a Scottish one as soon as I can and wait as long as it takes![]()
Well, don't hold your breath. Imagine how long it would take the Scottish passport service to work through the backlog.
You haven't thought it through. Of course the Glasgow office could cope as is, so long as everybody would be content to wait until their UK passport expires before getting a Scottish one. Passports last for ten years so in broad terms the passport service is geared up to replace 10% of them every year. But if Scotland wins independence and a lot of newly independent Scots want Scottish passports, that causes a short term headache.As these are current passport offices, I'd think Glasgow probably already coping with Scotland's passport applicants. No change post FREEEEEDOM (sorry I got a bit Wallace there)
That's needlessly and thoughtlessly negative. It seems more reasonable to suppose that the Scottish passport service would retain the expertise and systems developed by the UK service, rather than having to reinvent the wheel from scratch.Great time for consultants to teach the Scottish government on how to deal with these kind of documents, The biometric stores that come with it. And I haven't even begun about identifying other countries. It will be great loadsa money to be made in lots of areas of government administration.
No you won't. That's ridiculous.And then you'll have a Scottish passport and I look forward to a lot of countries going huh? What is that. That is a fake. You are part of the UK, go home![]()
You are making an assumption that the systems can be split, or are capable of multi tenancy or that the expertise of creating a new service from the UK came from within the ranks of the civil servants in the UK. Or that the iP hasn't been given away to the large system integrators.That's needlessly and thoughtlessly negative. It seems more reasonable to suppose that the Scottish passport service would retain the expertise and systems developed by the UK service, rather than having to reinvent the wheel from scratch.
Ok go home may depend on where you are, I can guarantee it will be the cause for some delays. A lot of systems and clearances are automated these days, many passports unfortunately deviate from the standards. Adding a whole new one into those systems can take time, dealing with the peculiarities of the implementation takes even longer. Any deviation likely means getting out of the queue and manual processing subject to further delays. Of course over time when it matures these things will go away, in the initial period there will be pain.No you won't. That's ridiculous.
Is this the longest running thread on TP?
I think it might actually be yes. I know of at least two other companies who, because of the market they're in, are saying they've no option but to relocate to England or close if the vote goes that way. I'm not sure about us, it might still be viable but we'd seriously have to consider relocating as well. Not much in the grand scheme of things maybe (about 50 degree level jobs overall) but a Yes vote isn't a vote for a guaranteed utopia.Naturally, because I'm hoping for a yes vote, as a Scot, I'm pessimistic and expect the result to be "No"
When we think 'country' and people have mentored we would be similar to Iceland or Finland ( queue the Monty Python song) - they are not exactly known as a global voice. I think that if Scotland gained independence then as a country you would also loose global influence.
but a Yes vote isn't a vote for a guaranteed utopia.
When we think 'country' and people have mentored we would be similar to Iceland or Finland ( queue the Monty Python song) - they are not exactly known as a global voice. I think that if Scotland gained independence then as a country you would also loose global influence.