Recent content by Turtlelover666

i noticed this as well, off with the Uv i think :)

thanks for the advice everyone, i have narrowed it down to to lenses, the 100-400mm and the sigma 50-500mm OS. Im thinking the latter may be my best bet for wildlife and thhe occasional rugby match

this is just going to turn into a canon is better, no nikon is better post. whatever works for you, everyone is different and has different needs :)

i need help deciding what to get, i need a lens for wildlife photography and cant decide between the canon 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 IS USM with a 1.4 or 2.0x converter. Or the Sigma 50-500mm APO DG OS HSM??? I am really confused. this will be my first big lens so if someone could help me decide that...

I take my dslr and zoom lens to all the international rugby matches I go to at murryfield stadium and never have a problem

Papua New Guinea to photograph the bird of paradise :love:

55-250mm IS, cant go wrong :)

I have a 3rd party grip for my 50d but only have one battery in it, and i dont notice any drain. you may have a faulty one

I am in need of a new lens, which i will be using for mainly wildlife but also for the occasional rugby game. i was looking at the Canon 300mm f2.8 L IS USM and also the Canon 100-400mm 4.5-5.6 L IS, what do you think will be better for my needs? This will also be my first L lens so i want...

I have this lens and cant complain about it, great lens for the price

50D over the 40D any day :) im looking at getting a new lens for wildlife shooting and was looking at the Canon 300mm f2.8 L IS USM. Will this be big enough for my needs? suppose i could always add a converter

why dont you look at the 50D, great camera. i moved from the 1000D to the 50D. i am also fairly new with only a year under my belt. But the 50d has taught me so much