Recent content by Brecksbirder

I have the E M 1 mkll and the OM-1, I find the balance very good.

I have the Sigma lens you are considering and am delighted with it, often my go to walk about lens. Also a very reasonably priced lens.

Robin on the granite sea defences sounding off.

How can I post photos on the site now that I cannot use Flicker to upload please.

Turnstone.

I think I'll give it a year or two to see how things develop, very early days. They have a lot of catching up to do on Sony, Olympus, Fuji and Panasonic. Very limited lens choice and poor battery life. As I said early days. Only having the xqd slot and no second sd slot worries me.

The gentleman's blog is worth a read http://garyksmithphotography.blogspot.co.uk/ in my humble opinion.

I found this, ongoing ,article a handy read. https://mirrorlesscomparison.com/best/mirrorless-cameras-for-wildlife-and-bird-photography/

I'm in a similar position to Jeff and having looked at the link you posted Wez, I'd say it looks like a good option.

Two of the first batch taken with the 150-600 C. [/url]DSC_1925r [/url]DSC_1908r

Is anyone using this lens in conjunction with the Nikon D500, if so how do you find the combination works, especially in relation to bird photography?

Can I ask what programmes people are using to convert their RAW/NEF files from Nikon D500 please?

Seems this may be too new for many people to have used one.

Tech Radar review on Tamron not very good in terms of colour aberration. Nikon review by Ken Rockwell and one by a user on dpreview good. http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3678980 Sigma was bottom of three 18-300mm offerings from Nikon, Tamron and Sigma on the reviews I read. I have Nikon...

I am considering p/e my 18-105 VR and 18-200 VR 1 towards the new Nikon 18-300mm. Does anyone have any experience of this recently introduced lens please. If so your comments and views would be greatly appreciated.