I must admit I found it difficult to get used to at first but only because it's fixed at what the full zoom of the kit lens (a bit further in reality) so I tried to fit all sorts into the frame but found that I couldn't.
Now I'm used to it I think it's a great lens, good low light ability...
That's help me understand it too. I think what makes it more difficult to understand as a beginner is that field of view and focal length. Now I get it!!
That's because it's being replaced by the "II" version which will be about double that price. I recently bought the current one at £150.00 from Amazon and I love it. I don't think there is much improvement with the II one so not worth the premium.
I think I get you now. So basically I'm getting confused with the word "crop" and "field of view". Therefore a lens for crop body on crop sensor will be 50mm for cropped body purposes but the "field of view" will be the equivalent to a 80 on a FF body with FF type lens?
I hope someone says...
I'm pretty sure you're saying the same thing as what I am getting at. An EF-S lens, which is designed for cropped bodies shouldn't have any cropping because the image it produces onto the sensor is smaller and is closer to the sensor.
With a ff lens on a crop sensor I can fully understand why...
Wow that was quite complicated to get my head around but I think I understand now.
My question is, does the crop thing only apply if you have a full frame lens on a cropped body? I.e. Canon EF lens on a 1000D like mine? If so, will the problem of magnification ratios be eradicated if you used...
I spent £370 on a 1000d just after Christmas which came with the 18-55 IS kit lens. As I'm still a beginner I don't find any wrong with the camera or lens and used used any filters yet. However, I intend on getting a polorising filter for when I go away next month.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.