How can we advise how to improve your workflow if you don't tell us what your workflow is?
Good point. I'm specifically talking about taking a volume of photos from scratch to 'ready to show a client' as quickly as possible. I use LR5 & PS CC, shoot Canon FF.
So, what's a reasonable amount of time to process 300 shots? I have seen some state a couple of hours, probably takes me 6 hours at the moment. The basics of culling and general colour correction, cropping, tweaking everything I'm ok with but need to work quicker.
Here's my general flow:
1. Once imported as DNG's into LR, mark anything with an x that is straight for delete. The best of the best I always flag. Usually go through 3 times in total.
2. Synchronise: 0 sharpening, +10 noise reduction [may increase this value in high ISO shots] Question: Do you search for these and how or am I being too clinical?
3. Sync all camera profiles. Have been using colour passport for a while now but maybe need less options here as I haven't found too many differences across different light temperatures though there are obvious differences with camera and lens combinations.
4. Full tonal edit: Basic colour correction, crop, levels, curves.
At this point do people take the odd pic into PS for rework or mark for later?
5. Let's say I do take a pic into PS for work. I always save as a TIFF then go back and 'unflag' the original DNG and flag the TIFF. I do this so that when all are finished I search via 'all flagged' and create a collection of finished lossless files which are the basis for any presentation.
I think one of my problems is the process of taking a pic from LR into PS and creating a file. I prefer to use PS for cloning etc and rarely use the adjustment tool if I'm honest, maybe I'm missing a trick but I do find it a little limited.
The area that I would be very keen to hear about other people's workflow is from here on. If you have your own presets for B&W conversion [I have a number] or your own style, how do you batch process these, all in LR as it's easier? Do you leave LR to do it all? I really don't like the sharpening in LR and do have a few of my own actions set up in PS for reducing files and sharpening, for example, is this being over pedantic? Afterall, there isn't the time for perfection?
Interested to hear your input on the above, many thanks.