- Messages
- 20,926
- Name
- Steve
- Edit My Images
- Yes
A wind up post from a thread I took part in Yesterday
Oh I see no worriesA wind up post from a thread I took part in Yesterday
Yup and crocodiles in the rivers would be a good idea.Bears are surely a better idea with that logic, and Saber tooth tigers in the south downs would really keep the numbers down, particularly the under 10's
Yup and crocodiles in the rivers would be a good idea.
Good idea.Why stop there, lets introduce them to Lakes and Lochs too. Catch off gaurd skinny dippers
game keepers mean increased cost
wolves get introduced, do the same job or better, and generate tourism money
increased cost or increased revenue? I know what I'd go for
![]()
KILL ALL HUMANS!!!!
wait, what..
(source: http://www.businessinsider.com/bill-gates-mind-blowing-infographic-mosquiotes-2014-4)
Is that wolves or mossies or people. I'm confused now must keep upNot nice at all and very scary.
Kill them all!![]()
Your whole account appears to be a wind up to be honest.
Keeping it simple for you:
More wolves, fewer deer, more heather and pine forest, less physical erosion and more nesting areas for birds.
Nice. I don't think a single person would miss Mosquitos if they went extinct next week.Mosquito nearly killed my friend yesterday.
He ended up in hospital with delayed anaphalaxis after being bitten just TWICE on Thursday night! Came on fairly gradually to start and then rapidly escalated with over 100 large red lumps all over and severe swelling of face, eyes throat and limbs.
Not nice at all and very scary.
Kill them all!![]()
I watched an interesting documentary on Wolves being re-introduced to Yellowstone a few years ago. It talked about the changes you mention, some were not due to less animals, but animals having less time to stay in one place \ being chased. The effect was by rivers plants were growing slightly taller, beavers were coming back etc. I can't remember enough of it to describe it accurately here, I think it was a National Geographic program, worth watching for those genuinely interested in this.
I watched an interesting documentary on Wolves being re-introduced to Yellowstone a few years ago. It talked about the changes you mention, some were not due to less animals, but animals having less time to stay in one place \ being chased. The effect was by rivers plants were growing slightly taller, beavers were coming back etc. I can't remember enough of it to describe it accurately here, I think it was a National Geographic program, worth watching for those genuinely interested in this.
I'm all for it in Scotland. You would need to cater to loss of livestock to farmers should that occur, but I'd expect to be a positive attracting lots of tourists. I've been to Yosemite looking for bears (didn't see any mind you) but lots of people travel to these places to hope to see some of this, same as safaris etc.
If everyone in the world took the approach of the OP, you'd just go and kill every dangerous wild creature. Bye bye lions, tigers, sharks, elephants, snakes etc etc - we're on our way to do that of course. There is a balance to be found I admit.
What about the highland midge?
Its the sneakier nastier cheekier Scottish cousin of the mosquito.
Forget dangerous dogs and wolves. Invest in a way to rid us of the dreaded midge![]()
I lived and was educated on Skye. It's worthy to note that with midges, it's only the females that bite. That seems to reflect on life itself somehowThat's a very good point actually.Of course as with supposed big cats etc, who knows there may already be some roaming free.....................................................................
From what I've seen around here over the years, I have no reason to disbelieve you or him.There are Wallabies in the Peak district too.
Some years ago, a mate of mine, as honest and no nonsense guy as you could wish to meet, came face to face with a large cat as he sat in his car in a lay-by one night in Devon.
What sort of big cat? (Serious question)There are Wallabies in the Peak district too.
Some years ago, a mate of mine, as honest and no nonsense guy as you could wish to meet, came face to face with a large cat as he sat in his car in a lay-by one night in Devon.
He thought it was either a leopard or panther.
Was it a yellow spotty one, or a black one?He thought it was either a leopard or panther.
Panther would be interesting as there is no such animal!

What?Panther would be interesting as there is no such animal!
It's a generic term for a number of different animals, leopard, cougar jaguar.What?