- Messages
- 10,135
- Edit My Images
- No
I am a PC user and have often thought about the change, but to get one thats equal to my PC would cost around 7k.........big jump from a PC that cost me 2k to build and thats not including monitor kb and rodent
I am a PC user and have often thought about the change, but to get one thats equal to my PC would cost around 7k.........big jump from a PC that cost me 2k to build and thats not including monitor kb and rodent
actually its a dual core sorry
edit.......and the 7k was what another member here said I would have to pay (a while ago)
No doubt it would mate but would rather get my use from this one first and once it starts to fail then think again, seriously at a mac as they do seem better than PCs
I wasn't suggesting that you change your computer now just that whoever quoted your £7K was rather inaccurate!
forgot who it wasit was last year or threaboutsforgot who it was
![]()
Off train spotting are we?![]()
mac = anorak......:shrug:

Yes, I think November is a distinct possibility.
Any news on a specific date? I'm making the switch and getting an iMac for Xmas. If theres a new one coming out ill wait a bit ***.
Do you think itll be any physical changes or just beefing up the guts of it like the last update?

is one better than the other? is one more stable than the other? does one need replacing sooner than the other? simple.. NO.
We tend to look like we are arguing on threads like this but I do agree with what you say after this but:
MacOS IS more efficient and a Mac will feel faster than a similarly specced Windows PC this also drags out its useful life.
Macs ARE more stable - Are they totally stable NO but they are more stable than Windows machines, it is very rare that a program under MacOS will crash the whole system requiring a reset. The big thing though is that most drivers are written by Apple which means that they are designed to work together. Windows has to handle numerous things that it has never even heard of. If Apple brought out a blu-ray writer and something in the OS caused a stability problem they can just re-write that bit of the OS. Windows hardware providers do not have this option.
I really do use both constantly and have no axe to grind. Windows 7 is VASTLY better than Vista so yes make sure you see that before making an decisions. I think it is due out on Thursday (might be wrong)
is one better than the other? is one more stable than the other? does one need replacing sooner than the other? simple.. NO.
QUOTE]
This is simply wrong. OSX is far, far more stable than XP or Vista. I own a macbook pro, 24" imac, a HP tablet running Vista and a Samsung running XP.
The HP with Vista has frequent software issues, the netbook is more stable running XP but the two macs perform without any issues at all, 100% stable.
I have no axe to grind with Windows, in fact my brother-in-law has worked as a software developer at Microsoft in Seattle for many years and I can get any MS software packages for $10-$40 dollars from the MS shop. I find OSX software much better.
Windows 7 appears to be a much better OS than Vista but I would highly recommend Macs and OSX every time.
my advice would be to go to an apple store and play around, then find someone with an install of Windows 7 and also have a play. then make your mind up..![]()
This is simply wrong. OSX is far, far more stable than XP or Vista.
Those of us that work in the industry (and I am guessing neil_g is one of them)
I think the problem here is (and I must admit it winds me up a bit) is that many people make comments like "I've had a Mac for 8 years...." and "my old PC kept crashing..." or "my brother told me..." and seek to pass this off as incontravertable fact. Those of us that work in the industry (and I am guessing neil_g is one of them) see a different side of things and can base our comments on what happens in the real world when this gear is used for it's main purpose - to help companies make money.
You simply cannot state as fact to people here that "OSX is far, far more stable than XP or Vista" based on "I own a macbook pro, 24" imac, a HP tablet running Vista and a Samsung running XP". That's just your limited experience of the subject. It looks like Neil supports his fair share of Macs and in my own team, we support many hundreds of computers (including Macs) across 16 countries and I can say with confidence that there is not much to chose between the 2 platforms.
There is a reason why Windows PC's have over 90% of the market and it's not to do with good marketing. As I advised the OP in my last post "the choice is ENTIRELY down to your own personal preference and what works best for you". So, let's stick to the facts.