I'm looking to get a wide format printer so that I do my own larger, more dramatic framed images and panos, and bigger canvas wraps. Looking at the HP Z3200 or the Canon ipf6100, both 24". (Discounted Epson as I wanted to avoid clogging and excessive ink usage when cleaning - this is just a hobby for me at the mo, will not be printing every day).
Be interested in feedback from you all on any input. Don't see alot of feedback on printers here but hopefully there are a few of you who own one or the other.
From what I have researched so far (by no means fact just my interpretation from what I've read). By all accounts image quality on both very good (I am getting samples), so as to pros/cons:
Pros 3200:
- Inbuilt spectrometer for custom profiles on any paper.
- Already have a HP 9180 and happy with output.
- Some say better for black and white given 4 dedicated black/gray inks.
- Although more expensive than Canon some good deals at the moment with free inks (complete set) and paper.
- (relatively) cheap print head replacement.
Cons 3200:
- Seems to be more info on various forums with faults etc (is this because there is wider ownership of 3100/3200 ?)
- Previous issues with starwheel marks on 3100, although seems solved in 3200.
- Mixed feedback on HP support although does seem to be more a case of getting past 1st line to a specialist.
- Fan can be noisy when in standby
- Relatively new - is it fully bug free / bedded in.
- Needs to use gloss optimizer to avoid bronzing
Pros ipf6100
- Faster
- Great user community on the Canon ipfWiki
- Better with single sheets (maybe not an issue as I plan to keep 9180 for smaller work)
- No starwheels, suction based.
- Automatic roll cutter works with canvas (does not on the HP ?)
Cons ipf6100
- Less flexible for custom paper (e.g. paper paths locked out for some media types etc)
- Although it does calibration (like HP 9180) no spectrometer for creating custom ICC profiles.
Cheers
Matt
Be interested in feedback from you all on any input. Don't see alot of feedback on printers here but hopefully there are a few of you who own one or the other.
From what I have researched so far (by no means fact just my interpretation from what I've read). By all accounts image quality on both very good (I am getting samples), so as to pros/cons:
Pros 3200:
- Inbuilt spectrometer for custom profiles on any paper.
- Already have a HP 9180 and happy with output.
- Some say better for black and white given 4 dedicated black/gray inks.
- Although more expensive than Canon some good deals at the moment with free inks (complete set) and paper.
- (relatively) cheap print head replacement.
Cons 3200:
- Seems to be more info on various forums with faults etc (is this because there is wider ownership of 3100/3200 ?)
- Previous issues with starwheel marks on 3100, although seems solved in 3200.
- Mixed feedback on HP support although does seem to be more a case of getting past 1st line to a specialist.
- Fan can be noisy when in standby
- Relatively new - is it fully bug free / bedded in.
- Needs to use gloss optimizer to avoid bronzing
Pros ipf6100
- Faster
- Great user community on the Canon ipfWiki
- Better with single sheets (maybe not an issue as I plan to keep 9180 for smaller work)
- No starwheels, suction based.
- Automatic roll cutter works with canvas (does not on the HP ?)
Cons ipf6100
- Less flexible for custom paper (e.g. paper paths locked out for some media types etc)
- Although it does calibration (like HP 9180) no spectrometer for creating custom ICC profiles.
Cheers
Matt