Why is it always the "birders"

CaveDweller

CaveDweller

Suspended / Banned
Messages
1,946
Name
Paul
Edit My Images
Yes
that seem to get the rep on here as being the most picky and most argumentative? Now I'm not a "birder" undercover here, I like to shoot all types of subjects and pleased if I get a decent shot at all...of anything, but I've noticed on quite a few threads that some people always seem to refer to the birding section when arguments are mentioned or just general "trolling".

I'm not referring to anyone in particular, it just crossed my mine because it's something I've seen pop up over the time I've been on this forum. What makes the "birders" any different to anyone else who like to go out and have fun with their cameras? Or am I just in the minority that thinks everyone should get along if we like the same things, or should I time travel back to the Hippie days :rolleyes:
 
I f***in hate hippies.
 
If you think bird snappers are argumentative. Try getting to the top of the yearly British tick list.
 
no more argumentative than anyone else .just got more time to post due to the lack of birds to photograph :runaway::runaway::runaway::runaway:
 
vetonbike said:
If you think bird snappers are argumentative. Try getting to the top of the yearly British tick list.
Click to expand...
I don't think anyone is more argumentative than anyone else(y) It's just the bird section seems to get mentioned quite a lot when it comes to arguments.
 
 
vetonbike said:
Try getting to the top of the yearly British tick list.
Click to expand...
They have a list for small blood sucking arachnids?
who'd have thought it Eh?
 
Back on track.

Yeh canna' polish a turd but if enough people tell it don't need polishing in the first place then you'll start to believe it and then how dare somebody say it does need a spit and buff up.

I find it pathetic and pish like that causes friction because people don't like being told a turd is a turd. Take a look.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top