I haven't read the thread, but here's my 2 cents....
Mostly I prefer full manual exposure, because mostly for my chosen shooting situations the light is fairly constant or changes only gradually. For times when the light is going to be rapidly changing I still want to choose my preferred shutter speed and aperture, because there are creative and technical considerations addressed by both those controls, but the one variable I can be relatively indifferent to is the ISO, and for such times I will happily let the ISO float and if time is of the essence I may was well let the camera pick it for me.
One such example was at a TP meetup in London for the Thames Festival. I was shooting street candids and the lighting upon the subject/scene varied between full front lit sunshine to backlit sunshine to full shade under trees. I needed to be able to fire quickly if I saw something interesting before me and had no time to be faffing about metering and making adjustments for myself. I wanted the aperture locked at f/2.8 for subject isolation with my 70-200 and the shutter speed no slower than 1/250 in order to control camera shake and subject blur. Shooting with a 5D3 it just made sense to let the camera pick the ISO for me, which would at least get me close to "correct" and allow me to get the shot rather than miss it completely. At times during the day I did switch to full manual when it made more sense to do so.
In the past I have been a stickler for manual ISO selection only, because I wanted to avoid the intermediate ISOs within the camera, but to be honest life is too short to be so super-anal about these things when there are more important matters to be addressed, such as getting the shot before it vanishes.