I voted yes, but only use it occasionally.
When I'm on holiday, in a city for example, I maybe walking down a dark street or alleyway, and the into a bright open square, stopping every couple minutes to change the ISO to a value I would have set anyway seems like a waste of time to me. Venice is the extreme example of this as it is so compact, and you could be walking down a very dull alley, which may open into canal, or a square, and it happens so quickly that you could be constantly be changing the ISO.
I only started to use Auto ISO when I got the D300. The D300 allowed me to set the shutter speed when the ISO changed from its lowest value, rather than the default 1/60th sec that most Auto ISOs kick in at. It also allowed me to set the maximum ISO which I think, beyond which, it is probably not worth going past because the quality is so bad imho.
Auto ISO is just another option available. I wouldn't use it by default, and I wouldn't use it without some control over when it kicks in, and some limitations. :shrug: But that's just me.
I would much prefer the option for the Auto ISO to take into account the focal length of the lens as on some of the newer DSLRs such as the Nikon D4/800, as it seems something so obvious and easy to implement. Maybe for my next camera. :shrug: