Having just stumbled across this thread, I started reading a few of the early posts and found comments about inspiration vs copying etc. Not wanting to go down that conversation rabbit hole but I think there's a difference that I can relate to very well....
When I first became a photography enthusiast I spent a lot of time researching the technical aspects myself but also scoured Flickr looking at photos and ended up finding landscape locations that I liked, one of which was the following photo from a random photographer.....
On Top of the World by
Paul Taylor, on Flickr
When I first saw this, I loved the idea of being in that situation and as the exact location was within a reasonable driving distance, I planned to go there and to try and encounter the same conditions. I did go and luckily I did encounter the same conditions, and took a slightly similar photo...
Like Minds by
NPUK, on Flickr
My photo was nowhere near as good and it could be argued I was copying someone's work, but the reality is that a random photo by a random photographer inspired me to research a subject and location that I previously had no knowledge of. The same can be said of specific photography techniques where copying can be a good thing if it leads to someone learning something.
There are many famous photographers, new and old, whose photos I like and will gladly copy their style, not for copying's sake, but for enjoyment, education, and because you never know where it will lead you.