Which aspect ratio?

Blasted

Suspended / Banned
Messages
927
Edit My Images
Yes
So whats your prefered aspect ratio?

Im currently using a 7D which I believe is a 4x3 ratio. Now if I blow this up I can get 8x6, 16x12 prints sizes. The 16x12 seemed a bit odd for a larger print.

I appreciate you can crop, but crop to what for the larger print sizes?
 
10x8 always seemed an odd size to me, since the 135 (35mm) film frame has always been 36mm x 24mm, ie 3x2. I know that 10x8 was/is a large format size but that was verging on the archaic even back when I started taking photographs! TBH, what I would like is an option to shoot at 1:1.4142etc - as in A series paper dimensions. No huge deal to leave important bits out of the ends (or top and bottom) of a shot and crop to A series dimensions in PSE or just make sure nothing important's missing in a Print Preview window before hitting the print button.
 
My mistake, thats what I meant.

at 3x2 if blown up it becomes 12x8 which looks odd compared to a 10x8 for example.

It doesn't look odd, it's just that we've got used to the 5x4 ratio's which pre date all of us.

If you're cropping close in camera at 3x2 you can easily shoot yourself in the foot when you start to shoot as a pro. There's nothing wrong with using all of that 3x2 frame, but you have to realise that will limit your output sizes. So when you're picking your print sizes you'll have made those creative decisions.

Oops I didn't realise I was in Talk Basics - Knock yourself out with whatever shape frame you like - don't even worry about having to crop or stitch for creative picture shapes.
 
Last edited:
I just crop for the paper size im using and whether i like a border or not, most of the time there are bits you can lose anyway.
 
My personal preference is to try and fill the shot, reducing the need to crop later on where possible. Its easier than trying to leave space so I can crop between ratios.

I also ask because i'm going to be taking a few shots down at a wedding soon and should anyone want a pictures printed out i'm considering how they would look and how they would be framed. So i'm also interested from a business point of view. What do wedding togs print off at?

I recently printed a 12x8 portrait and it looked a bit long and thin.
 
My personal preference is to try and fill the shot, reducing the need to crop later on where possible. Its easier than trying to leave space so I can crop between ratios.

I also ask because i'm going to be taking a few shots down at a wedding soon and should anyone want a pictures printed out i'm considering how they would look and how they would be framed. So i'm also interested from a business point of view. What do wedding togs print off at?

I recently printed a 12x8 portrait and it looked a bit long and thin.

We choose our products and shoot to suit. Most people don't like the look of the 3:2 ratio once it's above 6x4 like you said it looks a bit long. As an amateur I used to shoot quite tight but I soon realised I was giving myself very little room for manoeuvre so I shoot a lot looser now. If you shoot loose you can crop however you like, but once you've shot tight on 3:2 other aspect ratios will mean you're cutting into stuff you thought was important at the time.
 
I might just have to look at taking a step back in future, get in a bit of breathing room.

Is there a typical wedding picture size, the albums look large and I would have thougt they were aroudn the 10x8 mark.
 
The old British paper sizes were a bit inconsistent. And never matched the film sizes very well, which made enlargement a compromise.
but no one cared in the least.
Square negative were never exhibited square, it was not liked as a print format, nor was paper made for it.


All the larger sizes were used for exhibitions Often printed one size and mounted on the next size up. even though the proportions differed.

Most amateurs exhibited at 15x12 0r 20x16
whole plates and half plates were often used for postal clubs.


2 1/4x 3 1/4
1/4 plate 3 1/4 x 4 1/4
Post card 3 1/2 x 5 1/2 (Varied)
1/2 plate 6 1/2 x 4 3/4
Whole plate 8 1/2 x 6 1/2
10x8
12x10
15x12 (16x12 is a new size)
20x16
30x40
in the 50's Most of these sizes were stocked in Photo shops in packs of 10, 25,100 in three or four grades and in Glossy, mat, white fine luster, silk and in Cream and white in both Bromide and chlorobromide.... the permutations were endless. Some shops would stock these in Kodak, Ilford and Agfa, all of which also offered speciality papers as well.
Agfa offered a real silk velvet surface, that produced the most sublime blacks, but was fragile in the extreme.
All continental sizes were avilable to order. As were other tinted bases, and surface finishes.

How times change

The most popular white fine luster, is highly resistant to scanning, as the surface reflects as a fine overall pattern of light reflections.
 
Last edited:
Blasted said:
I might just have to look at taking a step back in future, get in a bit of breathing room.

Is there a typical wedding picture size, the albums look large and I would have thougt they were aroudn the 10x8 mark.

There isn't a standard album ratio, but as modern albums have very flexible designs it here the least of your worries.
My large albums are 10:7 but there's also 2:1 and a3, a2. But you can design albums with landscape pages that give really long spreads. I suggest you have a look at some modern digital album designs during your planning stages.
 
I much prefer 3:2 ratio when shooting portrait, especially when shooting full length. Printing at 10x8 leaves far too much wasted space either side of the subject for my taste.
 
The problem with the 3:2 ratio is getting the picture frames at a good price. 18x12 will cost double a 16x12 frame that can be bought from wilkinsons ect.
I still prefer the 5:4 - 4:3 ratio,and one has to ask why all Tv's and computer until recently used such a size.I suspect the change was due mainly for marketing reasons rather than that which is most pleasing to watch.:shrug:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top