The most fascinating part for me is not the reaction from the wider internet, which sadly was entirely predictable, but the email conversation with the photographer at the bottom of the article. That is the second time in 12 hours I have read about how things are seen with a 'male gaze' and being one of those women that generally doesn't get riled up and jump up and down on the 'equality for women' band wagon, I have found this thought an interesting one. The other article btw was concerned with how Sweden changed it's prostitution laws and has slashed prostitution to a minimal amount, so not art related at all, but comparable in the sense that both are topics where you could conceivably claim a certain amount of 'seen from the male perspective' theory.
Was she she right to take the photos down? Possibly, but a part of me can't help but think it simply enforces the perception that the art world is a very small bubble that is struggling to get it's point across to the rest of the world and will continue to do so if those that are 'in it' can't predict the likely outcome of such images venturing out there and be prepared for it, ready to counteract it.