gramps
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 44,805
- Name
- 'Gramps'
- Edit My Images
- No
So he gets out of a bribery charge by legally bribing the court![]()
![]()
you couldn't write that
Edit: of course, thinking about it further, it does apply equally. It's just that a poor man could never take advantage of it.
Like it or loathe it, he's operating inside the law in Germany.
So taking a big handful v probably loosing it? I'd say Justice has won.Court spokesperson Andrea Titz said Mr Ecclestone: "The court did not consider a conviction overwhelmingly likely from the present point of view.
So he gets out of a bribery charge by legally bribing the court![]()
![]()
you couldn't write that
It has to buy you something. This is a victimless crime. No ones been stripped of everything they have, been beaten up, raped, murdered - who gives a toss.Lesson = money talks ... simples!
It has to buy you something. This is a victimless crime. No ones been stripped of everything they have, been beaten up, raped, murdered - who gives a toss.
The other guy involved in this, who is currently serving 8+ years in prison, probably gives a toss.
Justice was not served here, the German government could and should have refused the payment
As for the statement of it being a victimless crime, utter rot
So would justice have been served if he was acquitted as seems to been very much on the cards? Is what amounts to a fine better than a not guilty verdict?
Supposition at best
Court spokesperson Andrea Titz said Mr Ecclestone: "The court did not consider a conviction overwhelmingly likely from the present point of view.