What does everyone think of this keyring?

S

scaryrob

Suspended / Banned
Messages
26
Name
Robert
Edit My Images
No
Hi all
Do you agree with my new keyring?

8624708092
 
Last edited:
:shrug: dunno, can't see owt!
 
scaryrob said:
Hi all
Do you agree with my new keyring?

8624708092_dfcf3f8d3c_c.jpg
Click to expand...

This one?

Didn't realise that photography was perceived as a crime... Although its not strictly true... Certain types of photography is against the law...
 
george g said:
This one?

Didn't realise that photography was perceived as a crime... Although its not strictly true... Certain types of photography is against the law...
Click to expand...

You've never walked through a family picnic area with a DSLR then ;)
I'm pretty sure a p*** would use something less obvious, but its the DSLR that attracts the wrong attention.

OP, I'd think that would be more effective on a T-shirt!
 
Lyonspride said:
You've never walked through a family picnic area with a DSLR then ;)
I'm pretty sure a p*** would use something less obvious, but its the DSLR that attracts the wrong attention.

OP, I'd think that would be more effective on a T-shirt!
Click to expand...

Photo'd quite a few friends children playing at busy parks as i quite like the fun element of it - and they like the shots of their children... maybe i am just oblivious to it all... lol. It might explain why the parks are mostly full when i arrive and empty when i leave though... :lol::lol:
 
george g said:
Photo'd quite a few friends children playing at busy parks as i quite like the fun element of it - and they like the shots of their children... maybe i am just oblivious to it all... lol. It might explain why the parks are mostly full when i arrive and empty when i leave though... :lol::lol:
Click to expand...

I've had a couple of bad experiences, both the Police and local fishwives, but then I do stand out even without a camera.
 
Steve Smith said:
Such as?


Steve.
Click to expand...

As above... also photos of minors taken indoors or in a private premises without consent of the owners and/or the parents.

Public land and open space is fine to photo along with anyone on there (provided the photo is of editorial nature) but into private property can be a breach of privacy/being a peeping tom and therefore illegal.
 
tiler65 said:
Some photography is a crime.
Click to expand...

I thought you meant some of the wedding images we see on here lol I've seen some criminal shots ;D
 
george g said:
As above... also photos of minors taken indoors or in a private premises without consent of the owners and/or the parents.

Public land and open space is fine to photo along with anyone on there (provided the photo is of editorial nature) but into private property can be a breach of privacy/being a peeping tom and therefore illegal.
Click to expand...

Not quite true.

Weddings are shot on private land. People attend and generally don't give consent to the photography. If we shoot a child indoors or out it's not a crime.
 
Nope it's not (OK I get it now) lol - Yes that would be :D
 
EOS_JD said:
Not quite true.

Weddings are shot on private land. People attend and generally don't give consent to the photography.
Click to expand...

It's an implied consent as people invited to weddings generally know that photography takes place.


Steve.
 
Steve Smith said:
It's an implied consent as people invited to weddings generally know that photography takes place.


Steve.
Click to expand...

Totally agree - I have been challenged on a coupe of occasions by wedding guests (mainly filming on a dslr).....but the pro is engaged by the bride and groom to record and cover e wedding, so implied consent is present. I also make it a condition of my contract which stipulates that the bride and groom have secured appropriate permissions from venues, guests etc for photography filming purposes
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top