- Messages
- 20,926
- Name
- Steve
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Whilst I understand the sentiment its more the loss of life that's the shame
Lots of lovely old (and young) people gone for good too. Probably a bit more important?
I can't really say I'm particularly bothered by either.
This isn't about the human cost. That's another discussion.
We each of us have our different priorities. I'll agree to let you post as you wish if you will extend me the same courtesy.
100-150,000 have been killed, including many thousands of children. I'm not saying that the loss/damage of buildings and historic sites is not a great shame. However, my guess is that the parents consider their dead children more important than historic buildings.
@BRASH - even if you can't appreciate John Donne's " send not to know for whom the bell tolls", it stands to affect you politically and materially too!
We each of us have our different priorities. I'll agree to let you post as you wish if you will extend me the same courtesy.
100-150,000 have been killed, including many thousands of children. I'm not saying that the loss/damage of buildings and historic sites is not a great shame. However, my guess is that the parents consider their dead children more important than historic buildings.
Isn't nostalgia regarded as a thing of the past?
![]()