Yay another wedding thread! If anyone wants me I'll be at the back with the popcorn![]()

You lot probably scared the op half to death......
You lot probably scared the op half to death......
Hi guys,
For the first time i am covering a wedding. But it needs to be really good. So what all should i keep in mind before clicking in the event.
I ll be using D600 and 70-300 lens...
Please advice...

Nah the sheer volume of people sitting hear munching popcorn sounded like a pack of wolves.
Last month you posted a thread saying you were a beginner.. and have just bought your first DSLR...
Last month you posted a thread saying you were a beginner.. and have just bought your first DSLR... So I hope this wedding is as a guest.. We do all have to start somewhere - but not sure if a full 'paid for' wedding is the best place to start that if you've had your first DSLR for under a month.. Are you starting as an assistant? Is it a friend? Or have you been 'booked professionally'?
Perhaps you should read more closely before criticising. He said that over a year ago in 2012. It wasn't last month at all.
I would run a mile Phil, and nicely put here's hoping the OP does come back for help hey?

Well lets hope you never need any advice then.
...
Heather
I thought Kevin had agreed with you and me?
Of the 25 replies, 22 have no relevance to the OP's question.
What would you do if you were the OP?
To the OP; This is a friendly forum (honest), give us a bit more info (as per my earlier post) and we'll try and be helpful.
The fellas been here over a year, albeit contributed very little. I think they kind of knew what the response to a question like " how do I shoot a wedding and make it good"
I think the responses have been light hearted and completely in keeping with the TP mentality of friendly and truthful
Can we stop being (mock) offended on his behalf, it hardly comes over as a serious enquiry after a year aboard, or does it?
Actually it does come over as a serious enquiry.
OP obviously doesn't post much and is probably unaware of the previous threads on this subject, so how would he know what sort of response he would get?
I am sorry but the responses so far do not come across (to non-regulars) as "light hearted" they come across as unhelpful and childish, however they may appear to regular posters.
Not everyone wishes (or has the time) to post on a regular basis. Does this make them less worthy of a friendly, polite and appropriate reply?
Heather