Wedding Photographer needed!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Amelia.lew

Suspended / Banned
Messages
6
Edit My Images
Yes
Please help!

My partner and I plan to get married next August 16th 2008 and are searching a for a photographer/student photographer who can help us simply take pictures. We are both graphic designers, so we are more than capable of retouching/printing/photobooking them, so all we need is someone for the whole day to take pictures and provide them on cd/dvd. We are on a strict budget for this!

We are getting married near Canterbury.

So if anyone is free/interested...please email me your rates from about 1pm-10pm on the saturday and preferably your url.

Many thanks

Amelia
 
Sigh ... if that were all there were too it ...

Those few words, Make me run a mile.
Interpreted they mean " We want everything for nothing"

Not everybody can afford thousands on a photographer. If this is a genuine enquiry then the least we could do is respect it, these kind of comments are completely out of order. The word 'budget' is obviously not in everyones vocabulary but there are photographers with 'budget' packages which might cater to her needs.

This has ****ed me off now.

Amelia, if you were more local we could of worked something out to suit your and my requirements. Hopefully it works out for you.
 
Ameila, your best bet would be to get in touch with a local college/uni that has a photography course/unit and ask there.

I offer that advice with caution. Shooting a wedding takes a lot of experience, planning and coordination and without all of that things can go very wrong indeed.

Wedding photography is not simply a case of turning up and snapping away. If that's all you want then you'd be just as pleased with the results from the guest's cameras.
 
When we say we are on a budget, doesn't mean we want it for nothing! Its just when you state that its for a wedding, photographers charge over the roof. Plus without the retouching, that takes out a days work or so. As we are designers we can do that ourselves, and we know how much books/albums and photo retouching costs.

All we need is about 9 hours work, and then burnt onto CD, hence no other addons. So we just need a simple quote for this.

Thanks
 
aka. I think charging £400 to put the 'unedited' pictures on a cd and send it to me is a rip off! (one of the quotes i've got!), excluding the £1000 charge to take the pics for 9 hours!
 
I wish you luck in your search. Just something to bear in mind. Since you want the original pictures then some photographers might ask for an amount of money that you might think is excessive. This is due to them losing out on any reproductions of those photos as they have given you the digital files. Just something to think about when getting quotes.

:thumbs:
 
Not everybody can afford thousands on a photographer. If this is a genuine enquiry then the least we could do is respect it, these kind of comments are completely out of order. The word 'budget' is obviously not in everyones vocabulary but there are photographers with 'budget' packages which might cater to her needs.

This has ****ed me off now.

Amelia, if you were more local we could of worked something out to suit your and my requirements. Hopefully it works out for you.

Well said... thought exactly the same thing.
 
All we need is about 9 hours work, and then burnt onto CD, hence no other addons. So we just need a simple quote for this.

As I said above, it's not just 9 hours work. What about a meeting to discuss the style of coverage you want and to arrange a shooting list for the day. What about visiting the venue(s) and talking with the people there to establish what restrictions they have on photography?

Will you be processing the RAW files as well?

As a graphic designer how would you respond to a request to just turn up, sketch a logo on this napkin and I'll sort it from there?
 
aka. I think charging £400 to put the 'unedited' pictures on a cd and send it to me is a rip off! (one of the quotes i've got!), excluding the £1000 charge to take the pics for 9 hours!

No rip off about it, re-prints can be a major revenue source for wedding photographers so by having the digital 'negatives' you are denying the photographer the opportunity to earn his living.

It is not just a case of turning up and snapping, there is a lot to take into consideration apart from the obvious photographic skills, as Pixl8 alluded to there are usually two visits to the bride and groom prior to the wedding, a trip to the venue for a recce and at least another couple of visits after the wedding. All this takes time and fuel. Then there is the equipment, most of the serious wedding photographers will have thousands of pounds worth of equipment, nearly everything is doubled up in case of failure - go and check the cost of pro-spec equipment, you might be quite surprised.


Its just when you state that its for a wedding, photographers charge over the roof. Plus without the retouching, that takes out a days work or so.

I'd be interested to know what you charge as graphic designer as in my experience the cost of wedding photography has probably dropped in real terms, when I got married 11 years ago we paid £700 + album and that was for about 2 hours attendance by the photographer. As to your point about re-touching, most photographers will spend about 3-4 days on post processing, printing, designing and making albums etc, couple that with your other time you can factor in about 5 days per wedding. Still sound cheap?

I'm sure you will find a photographer within your budget whatever it might be. Just as a final point, how much is your cake costing? The reason I ask is that I have seen couples think nothing of spending £400-£500 on a cake and how long does that last.........
 
Weddings are ridiculously expensive. Low key registry office I'm aiming for I think...
 
9 hours plus at least another 9 going through the shots, pruning out the bad stuff and some basic PS work which every photographer will do, just as a matter of professional pride, even if he/she doesn't do a full edit. Even at £20 an hour thats £360, add expenses and all the other stuff and £400 doesn't sound out of it.

However, this shouldn't be a debate about justifying costs, it's a genuine request and if anyone wants to help then it's down to the individual to arrive at something they're happy with.

Welcome to the forum Amelia, hope you get something fixed up :)
 
Not everybody can afford thousands on a photographer. If this is a genuine enquiry then the least we could do is respect it, these kind of comments are completely out of order. The word 'budget' is obviously not in everyones vocabulary but there are photographers with 'budget' packages which might cater to her needs.

This has ****ed me off now.

Amelia, if you were more local we could of worked something out to suit your and my requirements. Hopefully it works out for you.

I said nothing about their budget, I just found it strange that two creative professionals would distill the work of a wedding photographer down to 'just take pictures' - and that a student photographer would be perfectly suitable.
 
But I seem to get the impression they genuinely just want someone there who is dedicated to taking photos. And if they're happy to have a student then they obviously don't care about all the photos being technically perfect. I think this sounds like a good opportunity for someone to get some valuable experience.

Some of you guys get riled so easily...
 
Perhaps have a word with a tutor at the local college, as you may be able to get more than one photographer who is studying to attend the wedding, thus getting you more pics of differing styles.

Good practical experience for them, and the payment could be in the form of new equipment for the college.

everyone wins :thumbs:
 
Not everybody can afford thousands on a photographer. If this is a genuine enquiry then the least we could do is respect it, these kind of comments are completely out of order. The word 'budget' is obviously not in everyones vocabulary but there are photographers with 'budget' packages which might cater to her needs.

This has ****ed me off now.

Amelia, if you were more local we could of worked something out to suit your and my requirements. Hopefully it works out for you.

Very true.
 
£20/hour to take photos is very steep.

i would have to disagree with that, and i'm not even a wedding photographer, i would say £20 an hour is reasonable even for a very good amateur, after all how much does any professional or trades person charge per hour, eg try getting a plumber or a solicitor out for £20 an hour, but thats just my take on it :shrug:
 
As we are designers we can do that ourselves, and we know how much books/albums and photo retouching costs.

how much would you charge yourself for same work :lol:

the wedding day, which you'll probably spend a fortune on, will be over & done with in matter of hours. Good photos will last a lifetime. Long after everything else is gone.
 
This has ****ed me off now.

Well thats how life is F***ed up, I'm sure you will get over it.

What ***s me off is people thinking they can get superb work and pay nothing for it.

Just read the statement below from the OP, bears my point out nicely. All they want is something for nothing.


aka. I think charging £400 to put the 'unedited' pictures on a cd and send it to me is a rip off! (one of the quotes i've got!), excluding the £1000 charge to take the pics for 9 hours!


9 hours of shooting time is approx £ 475 + milage + travel time + approx £500 - £1000 for the rights to the pictures as the photographer will loose out on any sales etc. Added to that I dont know many good photographers that would hand any pics over for the the purchaser to PP themselves without charging for the images. Also what sort of sort of job will the purchaser do with the pics, too much to go wrong and the photographer to get bad mouthed for it.
 
Welcome Amelia. I've often taken last minute low budget wedding jobs for quite modest money as long as there's a reasonable profit in it for a couple of hours work on a Saturday morning, so I don't have a problem with your request at all.

What I do have a problem with is your assertion that as a graphic designer, you're more than capable of post processing the shots to get the best out of them, which I sincerely doubt - any more than I am to take on a graphic design commission. I most certainly wouldn't be happy with you taking my shots straight from the camera, and my name being associated with the processed shots I've had no hand in, and few photographers would. Most photographers these days would shoot a wedding in RAW format, which I doubt you have much experience of handling -and why would you?

If on the other hand you're expecting fully processed shots on CD which you can resize etc as you wish, then I'm sorry, but as others have pointed out - you've hugely under-estimated the time needed to be spent in processing the shots.
 
Keep it civil guys, and Mark -deliberately defeating the swear filter is agin the rules mate!
 
Wouldn't touch it with a bargepole i'm afraid. Half the business is based on relationship with the couple and this one has just sneered at the value of photography so not a good start considering she's asking for something she either cannot or will not pay for.......I'll politely decline, it's got trouble written all over it.
 
I have to agree with CT here Amelia, I think the opportunity is a valid one & that you will find someone to fill that role (I'm sure after this thread that you understand the possible pitfalls.)

I am a Professional Graphic Designer & Illustrator too & there is no way whatsoever I would hand over clients projects to be completed by someone else, it is not professional in the slightest - I'm presuming that as a professional yourself that the same would apply to you?

I have no idea of how much you personally charge your clients for your design work but my agent takes a wedge of my profits & the budget is decided accordingly so as I am able to make a living - having to pay out for things such as this, wear & tear on equipment, travel costs, etc will also apply to a photographer & I think that the prices you have been quoted are fair tbh.

Best of luck with finding someone & welcome to the forum (& congratulations on the wedding :thumbs:)
 
WOW - what a very interesting thread, I'll try to tread carefully in my response.

I feel there's a significant message here - for both parties - and many lessons to be learned from the debate, for both sides. There are are several key comments mentioned that I shall try to elaborate on.

My partner and I plan to get married next August 16th 2008 and are searching a for a photographer/student photographer who can help us simply take pictures. We are both graphic designers, so we are more than capable of retouching/printing/photobooking them, so all we need is someone for the whole day to take pictures and provide them on cd/dvd. We are on a strict budget for this!

We are getting married near Canterbury.

So if anyone is free/interested...please email me your rates from about 1pm-10pm on the saturday and preferably your url.

Many thanks

Amelia
I have to admit that this initial post smacks of ignorance. It suggests that photographers simply press a button, take pictures and hey presto, as if by magic, out the other side comes a set of beautifully presented images that will last a lifetime. Not the case I'm afraid Amelia, even as a newcomer to DSLR's myself, I can appreciate the significant levels of expertise, skill and experience that goes into becoming a professional photographer.

I feel you have significantly under-estimated and under-valued the work of a photographer. Not exactly the best 1st post I've seen by someone posting on a forum... especially on a photographers forum, however... your second post suggests more of the same...

When we say we are on a budget, doesn't mean we want it for nothing! Its just when you state that its for a wedding, photographers charge over the roof. Plus without the retouching, that takes out a days work or so. As we are designers we can do that ourselves, and we know how much books/albums and photo retouching costs.

All we need is about 9 hours work, and then burnt onto CD, hence no other addons. So we just need a simple quote for this.

Thanks

I would have thought, as a graphic designer yourself, you would possess significant knowledge regarding copyright law, and of legally protecting ones work. Are you aware that it is the person who takes the photograph who actually owns the copyright for that image. The image is owned by the photographer - this is irrefutable, and is 100% clear in law. Now have a google at prices that are charged to provide a license to use another persons images - cart blanch. Maybe then you can begin to appreciate where a significant proportion of a photographers revenue comes from... the reprints of images taken, and the possibility of bagging the big one... the image everyone wants. It's what most photographers dream about... :) (amongst other things I guess!!)

Personally, as a photographer there's no way I would attend an event, and simply 'give' all of the images taken at the event to the person who has asked me to be there to 'take pictures'. That's just like asking a composer to write a piece of music and then when they have finished the composition, take the manuscript from them to do with what you desire... that's not ever really going to happen now is it...?

Besides, as was mentioned eloquently by pxl8...
As a graphic designer how would you respond to a request to just turn up, sketch a logo on this napkin and I'll sort it from there?
... that's not ever going to happen either, is it...?

aka. I think charging £400 to put the 'unedited' pictures on a cd and send it to me is a rip off! (one of the quotes i've got!), excluding the £1000 charge to take the pics for 9 hours!

As is the nature of the beast Amelia, you pays your money and you takes your choice. Pay peanuts, get monkeys - as they say.

It is all about purchasing someones experience, their expertise and their ability. Someone who has these attributes in abundance could very reasonably expect this amount, and a lot more. It is not a rip off.

Where photographers can learn and benefit from what is being discussed within this debate is simply this; 'expectation management'.

If we take Amelia as a 'generic' example of Joe public... there is quite obviously a huge under-estimation of the amount and quality of work that goes into producing that beautifully bound wedding album per sé. Maybe some photographers don't do enough in pre-sales mode, clearly identifying exactly what can be expected... what will be done, how long it will take, the amount of effort involved... the costs for that effort, prior to agreeing a final price with any B&G.

In any event... there's a huge lesson to be learned here...

/end of massive post!!!
 
Naahhh..... he's harder than that, they nailed him to a cross, and he survived ....... allegedly.

Although I'd never take on a wedding under any circumstances anyway, this thread is a gem just for that post. :lol:
 
If we take Amelia as a 'generic' example of Joe public... there is quite obviously a huge under-estimation of the amount and quality of work that goes into producing that beautifully bound wedding album per sé. Maybe some photographers don't do enough in pre-sales mode, clearly identifying exactly what can be expected... what will be done, how long it will take, the amount of effort involved... the costs for that effort, prior to agreeing a final price with any B&G.

I revamped my wedding prices a couple of months back and went from 3 packages aimed at 3 price levels to a single package of complete coverage. Here's how it breaks down.

£1950 which includes a £400 print voucher for the B&G and a £200 parent voucher. These are based on average spends for prints and albums and can be spent on any product currently available - I don't promote or push any brands so the client has complete freedom of choice. Normally there's a decent profit on prints but in this situation the cost is mostly the product which I don't mark up.

The remaining £1350 is for my time which averages out to 40 hours per wedding. That includes up to 12 hours shooting on the day, all the meetings with the B&G before and after the wedding. Visiting venues and most importantly all the time spent processing the images and preparing the print products. At 40 hours it works out to an hourly rate of £33.75 which is around 2/3 of my normal commercial rate of £50 p/hour.

There are a lot of photographers in my area fighting for the lower priced market, starting as low as £199 for a shoot and 50 prints from Asda (seriously). I didn't want to join their baked bean war so I dropped the lower priced packages to concentrate on a complete service that doesn't cut corners or skimp on quality.

As a result bookings have actually increased and the client's have seen the value in the level of service I'm offering compared to the cost cutters. I don't do a hard sell, I simply explain what they get for their money and how I "work" a wedding.

However, weddings are one of the least profitable jobs I do. Event work is paying far better for a much smaller investment in time and effort - next month I'm doing another NVQ presentation bash. 50 people are receiving their certificates and after I take shot of the group for each subject, about 10 in total. The council foots the bill for my time and the prints, one for each recipient at £8 each. It will take about 2 hours and show a profit of £400 or so. To get the same percentage profit on a wedding I'd need to charge £8000 or so :eek:

So although £1950 might seem pricey for a wedding, especially when the competition will do one for a tenth of the price, I believe the level of service and quality I'm offering actually make it good value for money and thankfully the clients seem to agree.
 
Wow I didnt realise that there would be such an uproar on this! Im sorry to have offended anyone, which I did not mean to.

I think I can conclude that I am after someone who has just graduated/had an ma in photography, or someone who is starting out. We not after the most 'professional uttered airbrush look'. We just rather someone else take photos then my dad with his SLR digital. I may have been unaware of all the licences that are connected to this all however. But as a graphic designer, if someone asked us to design material for wedding such as logos/invites/menu/place cards, i would personally hand over the artwork if it was fo non-profitable and personal celebration and a meeting would be included.

Perhaps my best bet is to find a friend or a friend of a friend who will happily supply me with the source files. We don't mind trapsing through all the images and editing it...as the few days editing increases the price which we would rather do ourselves.

But it is a fact that when u mention weddings, prices are at a premium. I don't believe spending £400 in a cake either.

Many thanks

Amelia
 
I think the thing that is being lost in the blow up on price is that Amelia will expect a certain level of quality in the end result of work.

I would treat a graphic designer in the same way as another photographer or artist. The hardest people to shoot for are those who are creative. They know more clearly what is possible then people who don't normally work in creative areas, and so they have a higher expectation of the level of work (my idea of casual work might be the same as portfolio work for people who aren't really photographers). (I guess the thing I am trying to say here is that the people that you can get at a cheap price point, may not be the people you want shooting your weading).

One thing I would say to Amelia is that it is your weading, and only you can decide how much you value the memories of your day. It is not my place to tell you how much you should spend, but from my point of view the only thing I will not compromise on is quality (I would never show a customer a unprocessed image).

Finally I hope everything turns out great for your weading Amelia.
 
Welcome to Talk Photography
A warm, friendly and helpful photography community


The lady asked for a quote, can someone just send her a quote, she will either go with it or she wont

I don't think she is interested in any of you telling her the ins and outs of what you need to do and how much it will cost you

If you want 400 quid to do it send her the quote
if you will do it for 200 quid let her know

she will chose who she goes for

If anyone else come on here looking to commision work and see's this they will look elsewhere :cuckoo:

and if you dont want to do it then don't send her a quote - simple! :bang:
 
Welcome to Talk Photography
A warm, friendly and helpful photography community


The lady asked for a quote, can someone just send her a quote, she will either go with it or she wont

I don't think she is interested in any of you telling her the ins and outs of what you need to do and how much it will cost you

If you want 400 quid to do it send her the quote
if you will do it for 200 quid let her know

she will chose who she goes for

If anyone else come on here looking to commision work and see's this they will look elsewhere :cuckoo:

and if you dont want to do it then don't send her a quote - simple! :bang:


Amelia is indeed more than welcome here. What's wrong with your post mate is it's just a little testy for someone who's just starting out in photography, especially when it's aimed at working photographers who've pointed out some of the realities of what Amelia is asking for.
 
Amelia is indeed more than welcome here. What's wrong with your post mate is it's just a little testy for someone who's just starting out in photography, especially when it's aimed at working photographers who've pointed out some of the realities of what Amelia is asking for.

As far as I see it she asked for a quote not life stories, and it doesnt matter if im starting out (well not really) or ive been doing it for 50 years

in any industry if a potential customer comes and asks for a quote you give them one

Im not an electrician but if I went on a spark's forum and someone came on asking for a quote to fit a socket I would expect to see someone provide it, if they want the work
not start going on about quality of wire and time taken to drill holes - just a "i'll do if for 70 quid love" - "here's an example of a socket I fitted last week so you can see how good I am", "if that quality of work is acceptable to you we have a deal?"

Sorry if thats a little off or am I expecting too much?
 
Amelia, as I see it you're asking for someone do 9 hours of photography on the day and put the unedited shots on CD. You must have an idea of how much you'd like to pay, why don't you post what you think is a realistic price - you'd be far more likely to get someone who might be interested in the job. :)
 
As far as I see it she asked for a quote not life stories, and it doesnt matter if im starting out (well not really) or ive been doing it for 50 years

in any industry if a potential customer comes and asks for a quote you give them one

Im not an electrician but if I went on a spark's forum and someone came on asking for a quote to fit a socket I would expect to see someone provide it, if they want the work
not start going on about quality of wire and time taken to drill holes - just a "i'll do if for 70 quid love" - "here's an example of a socket I fitted last week so you can see how good I am", "if that quality of work is acceptable to you we have a deal?"

Sorry if thats a little off or am I expecting too much?

Poor analogy. A better one would be to ring the sparks and ask for a quote based on you doing most of the job yourself, but him coming round just to wire the sockets and connect up to the mains supply. Most would put the phone down on you. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top