- Messages
- 10,503
- Name
- Raymond
- Edit My Images
- No
Right, last year I did a wedding with basically 1 lens - Tamron 17-50 2.8 and it as perfect as the Venue wasn't that big and I didn't need anything longer.
In a month I have another wedding however I am thinking getting a 70-200 F4 to go with it. Only problem with that is not fast enough and I know it, would you think it is worth it to get a monopod for the indoor shots?
With limited funds my options are:-
Canon 70-200 F4 + Monopod
or
Canon 85 f1.8
or
Sell a couple of lenses I don't use (Kit, 28-105 MKII) and get the Canon 17-55 2.8 IS
Unforunately I do not have £600 more to get the 2.8 IS......unless someone can lent/lease it me for the day in the Hereford area

I can see that I will only use the 70-200 or the 85mm during the ceramony really, the rest of the day i would have the 17-50 on the camera as I would be indoors with people all around me.
In a month I have another wedding however I am thinking getting a 70-200 F4 to go with it. Only problem with that is not fast enough and I know it, would you think it is worth it to get a monopod for the indoor shots?
With limited funds my options are:-
Canon 70-200 F4 + Monopod
or
Canon 85 f1.8
or
Sell a couple of lenses I don't use (Kit, 28-105 MKII) and get the Canon 17-55 2.8 IS
Unforunately I do not have £600 more to get the 2.8 IS......unless someone can lent/lease it me for the day in the Hereford area

I can see that I will only use the 70-200 or the 85mm during the ceramony really, the rest of the day i would have the 17-50 on the camera as I would be indoors with people all around me.