Dangleman
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 1,316
- Name
- Dan
- Edit My Images
- No
Lets be fair here
You have to start somewhere, we all did. We dont know the expectations of the couple. My first wedding was for a couple who were very close to me, and very broke. It was a no-brainer, get me to do it, or have no photographs at all. I worked with them, and they worked with me, and we produced a superb set of images
If somone has the required technical skills, the camera craft, and is fairly good at dealing with people... there is no reason why using first principles that they should not make a decent job of it. Really all the OP will need to learn (if the tech skills are up to scratch) is how to pose people and how to get a decent variety of shots quickly and fast. There are a few other very wedding specific practacle things he will need to know / cover off, apart from that, it is pretty much the same principle as any other social phootgraphy
Yes ideally they should second shoot with someone first (*hint) Yes ideally they should have 2 lots of "all the kit on the prefered list" However, we dont live in an ideal world, and sometimes the comprimise is pretty damm good
I am not saying shooting a wedding is easy, it is bloody hard work, and you need to be ahead of the ball at all times - it just seems at hat at the moment anyone asks for a little bit of help, a deluge of negativity is thrown at them
As Ii said earlier, we all started somewhere, and most of our starts were not perfect or ideal
What he said. I think that post sums it up perfectly.
You also have to remember that:
1. Not everyone can afford to pay for top end pro wedding work
2. Perhaps more importantly, not eveyone wants top end pro work. Some people just aren't that bothered. I think some wedding photographers, perhaps understandably as it's their profession, sometimes put more importance on the pics than the bride or groom ever will. Grooms more than brides I'm sure

