I suppose that those in the direst need of clean water are unlikely to ever see these mostly vacuous celebs tip water over their heads for whatever reason, and so there's no harm.
If they were standing in front of a dehydrated Eritrean child and doing it, that would be a little disturbing.
I hear you Ruth
I just find it is getting a little bit out of control and obscene now, even as far as the real cause behind it being lost with various companies & other entities jumping on the bandwagon trying to earn a quick £ to swell there already overflowing coffers
Always the way though.
A very small amount of money raised for charity actually goes to making a difference.
When my mum died, we talked to mcmillan about money in leiu of flowers, and their advice was to ask for cash. So we did. What we then did was ask them what equipment they needed at the hospice. They gave us a list and several items were purchased thus ensuring 100% went where it was needed.
I suppose that those in the direst need of clean water are unlikely to ever see these mostly vacuous celebs tip water over their heads for whatever reason, and so there's no harm.
If they were standing in front of a dehydrated Eritrean child and doing it, that would be a little disturbing.
I couldn't agree more. But when one considers the number of hours a day, and the distance walked, that many (usually women and children) have to expend to collect a similar amount of water, it seems a little disrespectful to see it used like that; no matter how good the cause.
But then aren't you getting into a whole minefield of being offended on behalf of someone else? A bit like towns not mentioning 'christmas' in their December plans in case it offends the non christian inhabitants, when in truth, 99% of those same people don't give a stuff and enjoy the christmas trees and what have you.
Yes, doing it in front of a a village of people who have to walk 10 miles a day to fetch water would be tasteless in the extreme, doing it in your own back garden here in rain soaked Britain is hardly the same thing and not nearly so offensive as the amount of water the water companies allow to escape due to leaks on a daily basis.
Well this business of "being offended on others behalf" was aired in another thread. A number of the people who defended that proposition seem to be actively in favour of not being offended on behalf of people with little or no resources to clean water. In this case I choose to be offended on behalf of others.
Likewise I've often wondered why so many people choose commute to work each day. Why don't they just move nearer their jobs. Just think of all the time and resources they'd save, not to mention the beneficial effects for global warming.
..and you are entitled to be if you chose, but if we all stopped doing things that someone, somewhere in the world, might be slightly offended by or find tasteless, whether due to their own circumstances, cultural differences or political persuasion, and add in all the somethings that someone somewhere in the world is offended by on behalf of some other one, the world would grind to halt pretty damned quickly.![]()
For me, the cost of fuel commuting is far less than the difference in mortgage payments would be.
So what you're saying is you do it for reasons that are personal to you.
So you agree with those of us who thought it was OK for Jeremy Clarkson to use the word "slope" in that context then? On the basis that the guy in question probably didn't hear it and only a couple of people bothered to complain to the BBC. There seemed an awful lot of posters in that thread who were offended on the Asian gentleman's behalf.
Likewise I've often wondered why so many people choose commute to work each day. Why don't they just move nearer their jobs. Just think of all the time and resources they'd save, not to mention the beneficial effects for global warming.
Except that the problem isn't so much access to water (they often have lots of water nearby) as it is access to wells that provide clean water that doesn't give them dysentry and cholera. People dwelling in these rural communities are often subsistence farmers who depend on the land on which they live. So it's not easy just to transplant an entire community (not to mention the fact that the wells will be used by numerous similar communities, for whom your brilliant plan would mean direct and probably violent competition for dry resources should they all decide just to relocate to the nearest well).Because generally our places of work are in over populated and built up urban areas and thus is impossible to live as close as you'd like. (Saying that, my place of work is a two minute walk).
Most 3rd world vilages aren't in built up areas and could easily have been founded much closer to a water source.
my opinion makes no difference, thats exactly the point, I am not on the internet whining about it. I get up and dress daily in jeans and a t-shirt, there are huge communities in other areas of the world that find women dressing as such hugely offensive - would you like to be offended by me on their behalf?
I always wondered why those places where women and children walk 10 miles each way to fetch water don't just move closer to the water?
I always wondered why those places where women and children walk 10 miles each way to fetch water don't just move closer to the water?
Even the earliest civilisations were set up on banks of rivers or near water sources, so why is the case so many 3rd world villages are so far away?
Likewise I've often wondered why so many people choose commute to work each day. Why don't they just move nearer their jobs. Just think of all the time and resources they'd save, not to mention the beneficial effects for global warming.
@archangel take no notice, I hear what you are saying
Let me relate to everybody a very short story from just a few days ago.....
I was sat in the office talking with a colleague, we were talking about a cheque for £500 that we had just posted off, just then we over heard some others talking about the ice bucket challenge thing - Now the £500 we had just sent off was so that a well could be sunk in a remote part of the world, enabling the people of a village to have fresh, clean, drinking and cooking water for the first time.
Whilst it is great that awareness has been raised with this ice bucket challenge it has now become obscene in my opinion
I always wondered why those places where women and children walk 10 miles each way to fetch water don't just move closer to the water?
Even the earliest civilisations were set up on banks of rivers or near water sources, so why is the case so many 3rd world villages are so far away?
I understand that some raise money for charity through this ice bucket water challenge.....but millions die of thirst each year or through water borne infection......why waste perfectly good water.....just donate the cash to water aid instead and then you do some good without freezing your b*****ks off......water is precious ....especially to those who need it.......
It's not wasted though. How is it "wasting" water? There's a finite amount of water on the earth which remains pretty much constant. How is me emptying a bucket of water over my head wasting water that someone else in another continent needs?
Some right thickos in this thread.
Simply concision.Especially those who can only string 6 words together eh?![]()
Some right thickos in this thread.

I still don't agree with wasting Clean water