Two Tone Photograph

jonbeeza

Suspended / Banned
Messages
9,388
Name
Jon
Edit My Images
Yes
Just watching the Wright Stuff this morning, Pauline Black from the two tone ska band The Selecter, is on the panel. How many remember her or the band? She was telling Matthew Wright, they had a photographer who was trying to get a photo. The photo was to be used for the cover of their CD. Apparently the photographer was taking ages, so one of the group simply got out their iphone and took a quick snap. They snapped one of the band members, and the photographer faffing about. They had a white wall as a background, and because it was done as a B/W photo, they reckoned it looked like a Banksy. They all thought it was so good, they used the iphone photo.

Thought that was a little funny..
 
Pauline Black is a despicable cow. I wouldn't give her the time of day never mind any credence as a photographer or singer come to that.
 
Pauline Black is a despicable cow. I wouldn't give her the time of day never mind any credence as a photographer or singer come to that.

Come on don't beat about the Bush,being all coy tell us what you really think of her
 
It was a most emphatic NO!!!!
 
Just watching the Wright Stuff this morning, Pauline Black from the two tone ska band The Selecter, is on the panel. How many remember her or the band? She was telling Matthew Wright, they had a photographer who was trying to get a photo. The photo was to be used for the cover of their CD. Apparently the photographer was taking ages, so one of the group simply got out their iphone and took a quick snap. They snapped one of the band members, and the photographer faffing about. They had a white wall as a background, and because it was done as a B/W photo, they reckoned it looked like a Banksy. They all thought it was so good, they used the iphone photo.

Thought that was a little funny..
The thing is that you most likely don't need a DSLR. As has been said on other threads these smart phones are capable of doing what 75% of what every one wants.They do those 75% of things from a 5 inch by 3 inch box out of their pocket. In certain situations I am now becoming embarrassed when I see someone using a DSLR. It's like everyone around has a smartphone in their pocket and is thinking to themselves , just let him get his big camera out so he feels good then we will take the proper photos with our phones when he's gone.
 
The thing is that you most likely don't need a DSLR. As has been said on other threads these smart phones are capable of doing what 75% of what every one wants.They do those 75% of things from a 5 inch by 3 inch box out of their pocket. In certain situations I am now becoming embarrassed when I see someone using a DSLR. It's like everyone around has a smartphone in their pocket and is thinking to themselves , just let him get his big camera out so he feels good then we will take the proper photos with our phones when he's gone.
A bit like being a smart arse you mean ? :)
 
The thing is that you most likely don't need a DSLR. As has been said on other threads these smart phones are capable of doing what 75% of what every one wants.
What, like zoom, fast shutter response, macro, high ISO performance, depth of field control and a viewfinder?

Get thee back under thy bridge. There are no goats for thee here.
 
The thing is that you most likely don't need a DSLR. As has been said on other threads these smart phones are capable of doing what 75% of what every one wants.They do those 75% of things from a 5 inch by 3 inch box out of their pocket. In certain situations I am now becoming embarrassed when I see someone using a DSLR. It's like everyone around has a smartphone in their pocket and is thinking to themselves , just let him get his big camera out so he feels good then we will take the proper photos with our phones when he's gone.
A bit like when I see people taking photos at race circuits with their phones and iPads..
I really don't understand where you were going with the last line either? Why are the phone images the "proper photos" now
Can't stand taking photos with a phone.
 
Last edited:
What? You want I do a different voice already?
Oh, and I took the liberty of fertilising your caviar for you.
Everywhere it went. What a Valentine's day that was...
 
The thing is that you most likely don't need a DSLR. As has been said on other threads these smart phones are capable of doing what 75% of what every one wants.They do those 75% of things from a 5 inch by 3 inch box out of their pocket. In certain situations I am now becoming embarrassed when I see someone using a DSLR. It's like everyone around has a smartphone in their pocket and is thinking to themselves , just let him get his big camera out so he feels good then we will take the proper photos with our phones when he's gone.


100% agree. The only reason amateurs obsess over them is it re-assures them there's a difference between what THEY do and everyone else does, when in reality, for the vast majority of cases, most amateurs could take the same images with a smart phone. Most amateurs don't print, and most amateurs actually "add" the elements that they feel separates them from "snapshots" by processing.

What, like zoom, fast shutter response, macro, high ISO performance, depth of field control and a viewfinder?

Get thee back under thy bridge. There are no goats for thee here.

Zoom - there are phones with zoom lenses.
Fast shutter response - yep
Macro - yep
Hi ISO performance - yep... and getting better all the time.

This subject comes up time and time again, and we even have threads and competitions to see who can create the best imagery with the most basic of gear, simply to prove this point, yet amateurs absolutely insist that they need to spend thousands on cameras and lenses. You see amateurs using Leicas and Zeiss lenses to take ordinary images that will never see a printer, and only get show at screen resolution as a JPEG on the internet. It makes me laugh.

It hurts, but the truth often does. The fact is, photography as a hobby is no longer the reserve of those with deep pockets, and specialist knowledge. Anyone can do it, and do it well. All you need is creativity. Ironically, that's the very commodity that's in short supply in the amateur world.

Also. the very thing that attracts most amateurs, particularly the camera club types IS the gear.. take their toys away and they may as well jack it in totally.

"yeah but what about Bird/Sport/Wildlife photography?" comments in 3....2......1......


:)

The only thing phones lack is truly good long lenses, and that's the only thing I can't imagine a smart phone ever being able to do well. However.... for everything else, the reality is you could probably do it on your phone.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top