Tokina 11-16 dx i , dx ii or Canon ef-s 10-22?

perryyap

perryyap

Suspended / Banned
Messages
45
Name
Perry
Edit My Images
No
Hi guys.. I am having a big headache trying to decide which lens I should get.. For a moment there I was sure that the dx i was for me until I read more reviews about the dx ii. But from what I understand, the main difference in the dxi and ii is that the newer version has a autofocus motor for Nikon cameras. So I'd wanted to know if it's any useful since I am using a Canon.

Secondly, I was reading up Ken Rockwell's review of the dxi and dxii. He suggests canon users to go for the Ef-s 10-22. Any thoughts???

My primary use for the lens is to take indoor group shots, landscape and architecture.

Thanks in advance!
P
 
I like things to match, so I'd be going for the canon - but that is more due to my OCD than anything else!
 
Another one for you to consider. The Tokina 12-24mm f/4 - built like a tank and works a treat!

I've got one and absolutely love it. I wanted to buy the 11-16 but I was in New York wanting to shot wide angle and B&H didn't have any in stock so i ended up buying the 12-24. Haven't regretted it for 1 minute. I've recently bought a Canon 5D MkII and it works on this too from about 17mm.

From what I've read, quality wise it betters the Canon & Sigma UWA's and is only bettered by its 11-16 brother, however it has a 'better range', assuming you don't want 11mm, that is. Most of my favourite photos have been taken with my Tokina and take it from a pixel peeper, it can take a lovely image. I have 3 of my own photos on my walls at home, printed at 50 inches x 25 inches, all taken with this lens and they look stunning. Also, don't worry about f/2.8 as you don't really need that for landscape photography. Most of my best shots are between f/11 and f/22.
 
Easy.

Canon 10-22.
 
Not that easy


I
Bought the 11-16 and have been very impressed with it

It's not one of those use it every day lenses but is tack sharp

I doubt you'll regret getting one
 
wack61 said:
Not that easy


I
Bought the 11-16 and have been very impressed with it

It's not one of those use it every day lenses but is tack sharp

I doubt you'll regret getting one
Click to expand...

I own the 11-16 and the 10-22. The horrendous flare from the 11-16 seemed a pretty good reason to regret getting it.
 
i will get 11-16, Due to the F2.8 and sharpness.... it's the greatest DX superwide angle lens, get it !
 
kimhc said:
i will get 11-16, Due to the F2.8 and sharpness.... it's the greatest DX superwide angle lens, get it !
Click to expand...

Why would you want f/2.8 on a UWA?

Anyway, clear cut for crop UWA on Canon. It starts with a capital C and ends in 2...
 
odd jim said:
Why would you want f/2.8 on a UWA?

Anyway, clear cut for crop UWA on Canon. It starts with a capital C and ends in 2...
Click to expand...

Shooting a wedding in dark church or hall or aurora for example? A better performance at f/5.6 at the very least?
 
perryyap said:
Thanks everyone... I've decided to get the tokina!
Click to expand...

Hi just wondering which version of the Tokina 11-16 you went for.
I am after the Tokina 1 or 2 myself for Canon but not sure if its worth the extra money for not a lot more really, for Canon users.
If anyone else has tried both of these, or regretted but either one over the other version, please let me know.

Thanks.
 
You gonna love tokina lens. build quality and optical performance is superb
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top