Eseffpe
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 53
- Edit My Images
- No
argh! i cant choose between the 400d or the sony a200 !
im just going to write the pros and cons of each camera so you can see where my trouble lies!
400d reasons to buy
-less noise than the a200 (apparently this is fractional only)
-DOF preview
-larger choice of accessories and lenses
a200 reasons to buy
-image stablisation (i do a lot of macro work so this could be extremely useful)
-spec is slightly better with regard to screen size etc than the 400d
-the lens that comes with this camera is apparently very well made, however the 400d comes with a budget "ish" lens which a lot of people seem to think needs upgrading eventually?
My main trouble here is choosing between giving up the more smooth shots that the 400d will produce or giving up the image stablisation from the a200. if the 400d has image stablisation there would be no contest, and i havent got the budget for extra lenses for the 400d to compensate for this.
Anyone any advice on which way to go ? will the apparently slight extra noise be visible on the a200? im not all that bothered about the accessories range, as the sony can use minolta and sigma and these are both very good manufacturers and cheaper than canon accessories anyway!
thanks !
**ETA - I cant find anywhere that tells me how small to wide the aperture is on the a200?? i think the 400d is somewhere between 2.1 and 90.3 (or something along those lines) this is important too as again with macro work DOF is essential. anyone know where i can find out?**
**ETA AGAIN!- can the 400d or a200 take coloured IR shots does anyone know? also...the a200 takes double the shots before the batteries die! - another plus!**
im just going to write the pros and cons of each camera so you can see where my trouble lies!
400d reasons to buy
-less noise than the a200 (apparently this is fractional only)
-DOF preview
-larger choice of accessories and lenses
a200 reasons to buy
-image stablisation (i do a lot of macro work so this could be extremely useful)
-spec is slightly better with regard to screen size etc than the 400d
-the lens that comes with this camera is apparently very well made, however the 400d comes with a budget "ish" lens which a lot of people seem to think needs upgrading eventually?
My main trouble here is choosing between giving up the more smooth shots that the 400d will produce or giving up the image stablisation from the a200. if the 400d has image stablisation there would be no contest, and i havent got the budget for extra lenses for the 400d to compensate for this.
Anyone any advice on which way to go ? will the apparently slight extra noise be visible on the a200? im not all that bothered about the accessories range, as the sony can use minolta and sigma and these are both very good manufacturers and cheaper than canon accessories anyway!
thanks !
**ETA - I cant find anywhere that tells me how small to wide the aperture is on the a200?? i think the 400d is somewhere between 2.1 and 90.3 (or something along those lines) this is important too as again with macro work DOF is essential. anyone know where i can find out?**
**ETA AGAIN!- can the 400d or a200 take coloured IR shots does anyone know? also...the a200 takes double the shots before the batteries die! - another plus!**
this is the second part of the dilema - however canon have an ebay refurb store this is where i was considering getting my 400d - another reason why im more drawn to the a200 - less risky...