tif vs jpeg for storage of images?

Good question Lawless. I'm looking forward to the answer to this one. Although I'm going to bed right now, I'm knackered and need the sleep.
 
Tif because its lossless so no degredation of the image when opened and resaved.
 
Neither... RAW
 
i tend to store mine in the format they come off the camera in...which is mostly RAW.

I suppose it comes down to how much space you have to store your pictures in...RAW I think will take up the most room, then TIF and then JPEG :shrug:

that's probably no help, so I too will be waiting to see what other people say!
 
RAW for me too although I usually keep jpg files for a while. If I open images and work on them, I will save as a tif. If I convert from RAW, and don't do any more PP then I only save the RAW. Convert to jpg for printing and delete jpgs.
 
Raw - untouched. DNG for masters and then TIF for processed. Copies of all on external hard drive too.

Anthony.
 
I might start shooting in RAW

It's normally just as JPEG (normal)
 
Interesting question and wonder if I can add, does archiving the raw files with Winrar for example cause any loss/problems on reopening ?
 
I'm not familiar with saving using winrar. I'm not sure if RAR compression is lossless, if it isn't then there probably is some loss of information. Most RAW files are lossless compressed anyway. If you want to save a bit of space convert to dng. This seems to save some space. Apparently the main saving seems to be with the embedded jpeg in dng.
 
Tif-and saved twice to 2 separate hard drives.
 
RAW, PSD (Photoshop) for my processed pics, then jpg for web-use (all saved onto 3 different drives)
 
JPEG, Level 10 :eek::)

RAW processed to TIF, edited, saved to JPG. RAWs and TIFs deleted.

99.99% of the time I'll only ever edit a shot once, so there's no need to store it in an uncompressed format.

Backed up onto two RAID arrays and an external drive.
 
RAW files and Tif for converted images I've worked on.
 
WeddingHack said:
JPEG, Level 10 :eek::)

RAW processed to TIF, edited, saved to JPG. RAWs and TIFs deleted.

99.99% of the time I'll only ever edit a shot once, so there's no need to store it in an uncompressed format.

Backed up onto two RAID arrays and an external drive.
Click to expand...

Eek! RAW deleted too. I could never bring myself to that even if I've got a jpg of the processed image :E
 
DNG with the original RAW copied straight from the card to an external drive.
 
Original RAW, processed PSD (unsharpened), Hi Res TIFF sharpened and low res JPG sharpened.
 
groovyf said:
Eek! RAW deleted too. I could never bring myself to that even if I've got a jpg of the processed image :E
Click to expand...

I used to keep the RAWs as well, but after a few years I realised that I had never once been back to a RAW, professionaly or personally. So I started deleting them after a six month delay, these days they go straight away.
 
frank said:
Interesting question and wonder if I can add, does archiving the raw files with Winrar for example cause any loss/problems on reopening ?
Click to expand...

WinRAR won't cause any problem's as long as you archive with no compression, or you archive with compression but make sure you store recovery records with them too (Theres an option in WinRAR).

I would generally not bother with compression and just use WinRAR in archive mode, which uses no compression. I'd hate to find a huge rar file had become corrupted causing me to loose all the RAW's in it :eek:
 
kfridge said:
i tend to store mine in the format they come off the camera in...which is mostly RAW.

I suppose it comes down to how much space you have to store your pictures in...RAW I think will take up the most room, then TIF and then JPEG :shrug:

that's probably no help, so I too will be waiting to see what other people say!
Click to expand...

Tiif uses more room than Raw. At least that is the case with my Nikon's Raw (Nef)
 
Just a point of interest, a couple of years ago a few top Australian wedding photographers and print labs got together to run a blind test on the merits of TIF vs JPG.

The same images were printed at various sizes up to 30x20 from TIFs, JPGs (lvl 12), JPGs (lvl 10), and lvl 10 JPGS that had been saved 10 times. The photographers and lab techs examined all the prints without knowing what format they had been saved in.

They unanimously decided that it was impossible to tell the difference at any print size between any of the prints - except for the multiple save JPG, and then it was marginal.

After that they all decided to save their images as lvl 10 JPGs, and after reading the report so did I.

Duncan
 
photoshop saves all edits in a version set anyway, so I just use jpg.

And my laptop is backed up by Windows Home Server every day :)
 
Level 12 Jpeg for me I keep the RAW only if I think I will fiddle with it some more"later"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top