- Messages
- 15,804
- Name
- Neil
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Perhaps they send them straight there, ensuring there will be some when they arrive themselves.So they're not prepared to wait for heaven for their virgins?
Perhaps they send them straight there, ensuring there will be some when they arrive themselves.So they're not prepared to wait for heaven for their virgins?
Or just a holiday. I heard Syria like all good holidays costs an arm and a leg as it's such a blast
Yes, and youngsters who go there are first sent to the careers office and asked "What would you like to be when you blow up".
don't know how it works in England but you can be prosecuted if you are over 12 in Scotland
You misunderstood.
It's not that they can't be prosecuted, just that I doubt there's much chance of it.
They would stand more chance of being prosecuted if they went fishing without a licence than they would do for joining Isis......and then all the do-gooders and children charities will jump on board and scream "poor children" and "it's not their fault!"
It's notCommon sense is an oxymoron.
I wouldn't want those traitors back here. They are a big PR coup for ISIS so they won't be leaving any time soon if they are already there. The Scottish woman who went a while back, Aqsa Mahmood, has been described as a disgrace by her family and a disgrace to Scotland, so I don't see why these girls should be given any leniency.
You misunderstood.
It's not that they can't be prosecuted, just that I doubt there's much chance of it.
It's not
TrueWell it ain't common or sensible.
there would be an outcry if they were not.
There'll be an outcry if they are as well. The authorities in the UK won't win either way.
Males who have gone out to join ISIL and then returned have been prosecuted on terrorism offences, at least one convicted and jailed.
I don't see why the girls should be treated any differently to be honest
You may not see why not. But then you wont be making the decision.
gender is not a get out of jail free cardYou may not see why not. But then you wont be making the decision.
Males who have gone out to join ISIL and then returned have been prosecuted on terrorism offences, at least one convicted and jailed.
I don't see why the girls should be treated any differently to be honest
gender is not a get out of jail free card
gender is not a get out of jail free card
true but travelling to syria being raped by a number of islamic headcases and then returning, is very different to travilling to syria being trained in the use of fire arms and the manufacture of IED and then returning.
all the girls would be guilty of would be contact with a banned organisation , in which case leniency may be a more sensible option for the reasons sarah states above
There's also the safety aspect to the girls. They come back and denounce ISIS what do you think ISIS will do to those girls years down the line or to us.
it cant be worse that what they already intend to do to us ... and hopefully years down the line we'll have resolved the issue by dropping a s*** load of high explosive on their heads and despatching them to paradise
Different people are different.What I don't get is how two families have made a public heartwarming appeal. Yet the third girls family is quiet.
I just don't get that.
it cant be worse that what they already intend to do to us ... and hopefully years down the line we'll have resolved the issue by dropping a s*** load of high explosive on their heads and despatching them to paradise
Is no-one allowed to state a fact (the first part of my post), and express an opinion (the second part), without running it by you first Bernie?
Did I miss that memo?
Absolutely, 100% every part of me screams out to agree with that.
However, if they do return / are returned I can see certain circumstances where rightly or wrongly, there may be more political value in NOT prosecuting or at least going lightly on them.
As females, their treatment by ISIL is likely to be very different to that of males who have gone out to join - most probably a million miles away from whatever rose-tinted, idealistic vision they were expecting and it's quite possible that they'll rapidly become disillusioned. In fact, they may bitterly regret the decision they made.
In those circumstances, if they were to come back to the UK, I can't think of a better way to deter other youngsters from following the same path than welcoming them back and allowing them to speak out about how terrible it was, how they made a huge mistake and urging others against doing the same.
Of course, the chances of them being allowed to return of their own free will in those circumstances is pretty remote.
But who is to say they wouldn't pose a threat to anyone in the UK if they did come back here. I certainly wouldn't trust them.don't get me wrong if they haven't done anything wrong then they wouldn't be prosecuted, but if they have I would expect them to be.
But who is to say they wouldn't pose a threat to anyone in the UK if they did come back here. I certainly wouldn't trust them.
As a parent there is no other way to get in contact and appeal. The other parents aren't involved in a media circus either. The media is actually rather well behaved.Different people are different.
Worried family with a daughter possibly in danger chooses to avoid the media circus rather than subject themselves to it? I get that completely.